SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi / 2014 / Cilt: 32 - Sayı: 2

The role of organizational commitment and Job satisfaction in communication satisfaction and productivity relationship: A test of multiple mediation model

İletişim doyumu verimlilik ilişkisinde örgütsel bağlılık ve iş tatmininin rolü: Çoklu aracılı bir model testi

Hilal DEMİREL
M. Gökhan BİTMİŞ
Semra GÜNEY
Pages
57–74
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Data is analyzed by bootstrappingmethod, which is based on 5000 bootstrap samples in 95% confidence interval.The results show that communication satisfaction positively affects productivity.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The purpose of this study is to determine the potential relationship betweencommunication satisfaction and productivity.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Surveymethod is used by collecting data from a sample of 339 specialist and assistantspecialist in public institutions in Ankara.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Data is analyzed by bootstrappingmethod, which is based on 5000 bootstrap samples in 95% confidence interval.The results show that communication satisfaction positively affects productivity.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to determine the potential relationship betweencommunication satisfaction and productivity. Further, we aim to reveal the roleof organizational commitment and job satisfaction in this relationship. Surveymethod is used by collecting data from a sample of 339 specialist and assistantspecialist in public institutions in Ankara. Data is analyzed by bootstrappingmethod, which is based on 5000 bootstrap samples in 95% confidence interval.The results show that communication satisfaction positively affects productivity. Also, organizational commitment and job satisfaction play multiple mediatingroles in the relationship between communication satisfaction and productivity.

Özet

Bu çalış manın amacı iletiş im doyumu ve verimlilik arasındaki olası iliş kininbelirlenmesi ve bu iliş kide örgütsel ba ğlılık ve iş tatmini de ğiş kenlerininrollerinin ortaya çıkarılmasıdır. Ara ş tırmada anket yöntemi kullanılarak,Ankarada faaliyet gösteren kamu kurumlarındaki 339 uzman ve yardımcısındanveri toplanmış tır. Elde edilen veriler önyükleme yöntemi kullanılarak %95 güvenaralığında 5000 önyükleme ile analiz edilmiş tir. Sonuçlar; iletiş im doyumununverimliliği olumlu yönde etkilediğini, örgütsel ba ğlılık ve iş tatminide ğiş kenlerinin iletiş im doyumu-verimlilik iliş kisinde çoklu aracılık rolüoynadıklarını göstermiş tir.

🔖

Cite This Article

DEMİREL, H., BİTMİŞ, M. G., GÜNEY, S. (2022). The role of organizational commitment and Job satisfaction in communication satisfaction and productivity relationship: A test of multiple mediation model. Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 32 - Sayı: 2, 57–74. https://ajindex.com/articles/533084

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Ada, N., İ. Alver, F. Atlı (2008) “Örgütsel İletiş imin Örgütsel Bağlılık Üzerine Etkisi: Manisa Organize Sanayi Bölgesinde Yeralan ve İ malat Sektörü Çalış anları Üzerinde Yapılan Bir Ara ş tırma”, Ege Akademik Bakış, 8(2), 487-518.
  2. Allen, M.W. (1992) “Communication and Organizational Commitment: Perceived Organizational Support as a Mediating Factor”, Communication Quarterly, 40(4), 357-367.
  3. Allen, N.J., J.P. Meyer (1990) “The Measurement and Antecedents of Affective, Continuance and Normative Commitment to the Organization”, Journal of Occupational Psychology, 63(1), 1-18.
  4. Chen, Z.X., A.M. Francesco (2003) “The Relationship Between the Three Components of Commitment and Employee Performance in China”, Journal of Vocational Behavior, 62, 490-510.
  5. Clampitt, P.G., C.W. Downs (1993) “Employee Perceptions of the Relationship Between Communication and Productivity”, Journal of Business Communication, 30(1), 5-28.
  6. Crino, M. D., M.C. White (1981) “Satisfaction in Communication: An Examination of the Downs-Hazen Measure”, Psychological Reports, 49(3), 831-838.
  7. Deconinck, J., J. Johnson, J. Busbin, F. Lockwood (2008) “An Examination of the Validity of the Downs and Hazen Communication Satisfaction Questionnaire”, Marketing Management Journal, 18(2), 145-153.
  8. Downs, A. (1991) “The Relationship Between Communication Satisfaction and Commitment: A Study of Two Australian Organizations”, Unpublished Master’s Thesis, University of Kansas. Downs, C.W., M.D. Hazen (1977) “A Factor Analytic Study of Communication Satisfaction”, Journal of Business Communication, 14(3), 63-73.
  9. Ehlers, L.N. (2003) The Relationship of Communication Satisfaction, Job Satisfaction and Self-Reported Absenteeism, Unpublished Master’s Thesis, Miami University. Ellis, D.S. (1976) The Central Role of Communication in Complex Organizations. in J.L. Owen, P.A. Page, G.I. Zimmerman (eds.), Communication in Organizations, New York: West Publishing Co., 18-34.
  10. Eroğlu, E, G. Özkan (2009) “Örgüt Kültürü ve İletiş im Doyumu ile Bireysel Özellikler Arasındaki İliş kinin De ğerlendirilmesi: Bir Uygulama Örne ği”, Selçuk Üniversitesi İ letiş im Fakültesi Akademik Dergisi, 5(4), 50-61.
  11. Fisher, C.D. (2003) “Why Do Lay People Believe that Satisfaction and Performance are Correlated? Possible Sources of a Commonsense Theory”, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24(6), 753-777.
  12. Goldhaber, G.M., D.T. Porter, M.P. Yates, R. Lesniak (1978) “Organizational Communication”, Human Communication Research, 5(1), 76-9