SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi / 2015 / Cilt: 33 - Sayı: 3

-

DENETÇİ BAĞIMSIZLIK RİSKİNİN BELİRLENMESİNDE KANAAT FONKSİYON YAKLAŞIMININ KULLANIMI: BİR UYGULAMA

Alper KARAVARDAR
Pages
75–98
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The aim of this study is to show the analytical representantion to determine auditor independence risk based on Dempster Shafer theory belief functions approach.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Auditor independence, in terms of reflecting the quality of the audit process is an important element of the financial system.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Independent auditor concept, essentially represents a public trust, has a direct impact on the efficiency of capital markets.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The aim of this study is to show the analytical representantion to determine auditor independence risk based on Dempster Shafer theory belief functions approach.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Denetçi bağımsızlığı riski · kanaat fonksiyonları · risk tayini

Abstract

Auditor independence, in terms of reflecting the quality of the audit process is an important element of the financial system. Independent auditor concept, essentially represents a public trust, has a direct impact on the efficiency of capital markets. After the audit scandals in recent years, providing auditors’ independence has become an important topic. Sarbanes Oxley Act (SOX) and other international regulations indicate the increasing importance of this issue. A math-based objective measure of the risk of auditor independence provides a clear evaluation about the reliability of financial information to financial statement users. The aim of this study is to show the analytical representantion to determine auditor independence risk based on Dempster Shafer theory belief functions approach.

Özet

Denetçi bağımsızlığı, denetim sürecinin kalitesini yansıtması bakımından finansal sisteminin önemli bir unsurdur. Bağımsız denetçilik kavramı esasen bir kamu güvenini temsil etmekte olup, sermaye piyasalarının etkinliğine doğrudan etki eder. Son yıllarda yaşanan denetim skandallarının sonrasında, denetçilerin bağımsızlığının temini önemli bir konu başlığı haline gelmiştir. Sarbanes Oxley yasası (SOX) ve benzeri yasal düzenlemeler bu konunun artan önemine işaret etmektedir. Denetçi bağımsızlık riskinin matematik tabanlı objektif bir ölçümü, finansal tablo kullanıcılarına sunulan finansal bilginin güvenilirliliği hakkında, açık bir değerlendirme sağlar. Bu çalışmanın amacı denetçi bağımsızlık riskinin belirlenmesinde Dempster Shafer teorisinin kanaat fonksiyon yaklaşımına dayalı analitik bir gösteriminin sunumudur.

🔖

Cite This Article

KARAVARDAR, A. (2022). -. Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 33 - Sayı: 3, 75–98. https://ajindex.com/articles/533061

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. American Institute of Certified Accountants-AICPA (1997), W. Burke Auditor Independence: An Organizational Psychology Perspective, A Report prepared on behalf of the AICPA for Presentation to the Independence Standards Board of Serving the Public Interest: A New Conceptual Framework for Auditor Independence, New York: AICPA, http://www.aicpa.org/members/div/secps/isb/white.htm American Institute of Certified Accountants-AICPA (2002), Statement on Auditing Standards No. 99: Consideration of Fraud in a Financial Statement Audit, New York: AICPA, http://AICPA.org./ American Institute of Certified Accountants-AICPA (2011), ET Section 101, 2006, ET Section 100-1 Conceptual Framework for AICPA Independence Standards, Code of Professional Conduct, New York: AICPA, http://AICPA.org./
  2. Ashbaugh H., R. LaFond, B.W. Mayhew (2003),"Do Non Audit Services Compromise Auditor Independence? Further Evidence", The Accounting Review, 78(3), 611–39.
  3. Blay A. D., A.G. Marshall (2013), "Auditor Fees and Auditor Independence: Evidence from Going Concern Reporting Decisions", Contemporary Accounting Research, 30(2), 579- 606 Brandon D., A. Crabtree, J. Maher (2004), “Non Audit Fees, Auditor Independence and Bond Ratings”, Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 23(2), 89–103.
  4. Chu A.G.H., D. Xingqiang, G. Jiang (2011), “Buy, Lie, or Die: An Investigation of Chinese ST Firms Voluntary Interim Audit Motive and Auditor Independence”, Journal of Business Ethics, 102(1), 135-153.
  5. Chung H., S. Kallapur (2003), “Client Importance, Non Audit Services and Abnormal Accruals”, The Accounting Review, 78(4), 931–55.
  6. Dart E. (2011), “UK Investors’ Perceptions of Auditor Independence”, The British Accounting Review, 43(1), 173–185.
  7. DeFond M. L., K. Raghunandan, K.R. Subramanyam (2002), “Do Non-Audit Service Fees Impair Auditor Independence? Evidence from Going Concern Audit Opinions”, Journal of Accounting Research, 40(4), 1247–74.
  8. Edwards, A.W.F. (1984), Likelihood: An Account of the Statistical Concept of Likelihood and its Application to Scientific Inferences, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,
  9. Frankel R.M., M.F. Johnson, K.K. Nelson (2002), “The Relation Between Auditors’ Fees for Non Audit Services and Earnings Quality”, The Accounting Review, 77(1), 71–114.
  10. Glazer A., H. Jaenicke (2002), "A Pathology of the Independence Standards Board’s Conceptual Framework Project", Accounting Horizons, 16(4), 329–52.
  11. Goverment Accountability Office-GAO (2000), Revision of The Commission's Auditor