Journals / Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi / 2016 / Cilt: 34 - Sayı: 4

THE DETERMINATION OF TECHNOLOGICAL INNOVATION LEVEL OF LOGISTICS COMPANIES IN ISTANBUL STOCK EXCHANGE (ISE) MARKET

BORSA İSTANBUL’DA (BIST) İŞLEM GÖREN LOJİSTİK FİRMALARININ TEKNOLOJİK YENİLİK DÜZEYLERİNİN BELİRLENMESİ

Pages
49–70
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The G logistics company is identified as the highest level of technological innovation.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Technological and scientific developments have closely affected business to use innovation as an important tool to compete in a global sense.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The purpose of this study is to determine the importance of the level of technological innovation criteria and to rank logistics companies traded in İstanbul Stock Exchange (BIST) by the level of their technological innovation.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The G logistics company is identified as the highest level of technological innovation.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Lojistik · yenilik · teknolojik yenilik

Abstract

Technological and scientific developments have closely affected business to use innovation as an important tool to compete in a global sense. The purpose of this study is to determine the importance of the level of technological innovation criteria and to rank logistics companies traded in İstanbul Stock Exchange (BIST) by the level of their technological innovation. For this purpose, Fuzzy AHP method is used to weight the criteria and Fuzzy VIKOR is used to rank the logistics companies. As a result of this study, “radical innovation” is identified as the most important main criteria and “automated material transport systems” is identified as the most important sub-criteria in determining the level of technological innovation. The G logistics company is identified as the highest level of technological innovation.

Özet

Teknolojik ve bilimsel alanda yaşanan gelişmeler, işletmelerin küresel anlamda rekabet edebilmeleri, büyümeleri ve üstünlük sağlamaları için yeniliği önemli bir araç haline getirmiştir. Bu çalışmanın amacı, teknolojik yenilik kriterlerinin önem düzeyinin belirlenerek Borsa İstanbul’da (BIST) işlem gören lojistik firmalarını teknolojik yenilik seviyelerine göre sıralamaktır. Bu amaçla kriterlerin ağırlıklandırılmasında Bulanık AHP, firmaların sıralanmasında ise Bulanık VIKOR yöntemleri kullanılmıştır. Çalışma sonucunda, teknolojik yenilik seviyesinin belirlenmesinde “radikal yenilik” en önemli ana kriter ve “otomatik malzeme taşıma sistemleri” de en önemli alt kriter olarak tespit edilmiştir. G lojistik firması ise teknolojik yenilik düzeyi en yüksek firma olarak belirlenmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

AR, İ. M., YILMAZ, E., PEKER, İ. (2022). THE DETERMINATION OF TECHNOLOGICAL INNOVATION LEVEL OF LOGISTICS COMPANIES IN ISTANBUL STOCK EXCHANGE (ISE) MARKET. Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 34 - Sayı: 4, 49–70. https://ajindex.com/articles/533043

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Ar, İ. M., Baki, B., Özdemir, F. (2014), “Kuruluş Yeri Seçiminde Bulanık AHS-VIKOR Yaklaşımının Kullanımı: Otel Sektöründe Bir Uygulama”, Uluslararası İktisadi ve İdari İncelemeler Dergisi, 7(13), 93-114.
  2. Akyıldız, M., O. Tuna (2007), “Lojistik Değer ve Ek Değer: Bir Odak Grup Çalışması”, Ege Akademik Bakış, 7(2), 645-659.
  3. Buckley, J.J. (1985), “Ranking Alternatives Using Fuzzy Numbers”, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 15, 233-247.
  4. Burmaoğlu, S. (2012), Ulusal İnovasyon Göstergeleri ile Ulusal Lojistik Performans Arasındaki İlişki: AB Ülkeleri Üzerine Bir Araştırma, Ege Akademik Bakış, 12(2), 193- 208. Busse, C., W.C. Marcus (2011), “Innovation Management of Logistics Service Providers: Foundations, Review, and Research Agenda”, International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 41(2), 187-218.
  5. Chang, D., (1996), “Applications of the Extend Analysis Method on Fuzzy AHP”, European Journal of Operational Research, 95, 649-655.
  6. Chapman, R.L., C. Soosay, J. Kandampully (2003), “Innovation in Logistic Services and the New Business Model: A Conceptual Framework”, International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 33(7), 630-650.
  7. Chen, C.T. (2000), “Extensions of the TOPSIS for Group Decision Making Under Fuzzy Environment”, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 114, 1-9.
  8. Chen, F.T.S., N. Kumar (2007), “Global Supplier Development Considering Risk Factors Using Fuzzy Extended AHP - Based Approach”, Omega International Journal of Management Science, 35(4), 417-431.
  9. Chen, L.Y., T. Wang (2009), “Optimizing Partners’ Choice in IS/IT Outsourcing Projects: The Strategic Decision of Fuzzy VIKOR”, International Journal of Production Economics, 120, 233-242.
  10. Chu M., J. Shyu, G., Tzeng (2006), “Comparison Among Three Analytical Methods For Knowledge Communities Group-Decision Analysis”, Expert Systems With Applications, 33(4), 1011-1024.
  11. De Martino, M., L. Errichiello, A. Marasco, A. Morvillo (2013),”Logistics Innovation in Seaports: An Inter-Organizational Perspective”, Research in Transportation Business&Management, 8, 123-133.
  12. Evangelista, P. (2012), “Disruptive Innovation Trends in Transport and Logistics”, INNO-GripsWorkshop on Disruptive Innovation, 24th January, Brussels. Flint, D.J., E. Larsson, B. Gammelgaard, J.T. Mentzer (2005), “Logistics Innovation: A Customer Value-Oriented Social Process”, Journal of Business Logistics, 26(1), 113-147.
  13. Germain, R. (1996), “The Role of Context and Structure in Radical and Incremental Logistics Innovation Ado