SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi / 2016 / Cilt: 34 - Sayı: 4

AN INQUIRY ON THE LIKELY EFFECTS OF CORRUPTION ON THE FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENTS IN TURKEY

TÜRKİYE’DE YOLSUZLUĞUN DOĞRUDAN YABANCI YATIRIMLAR ÜZERİNDEKİ OLASI ETKİLERİ ÜZERİNE BİR ARAŞTIRMA

Mehmet Onur YURDAKUL
Umur TOSUN
Pages
71–96
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results indicate that the Turkish foreign direct investment inflows have both market and efficiency seeking patterns and corruption is a critical factor for the foreign direct investment inflows.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:There is no consensus in the literature about the direction of the impact of corruption on foreign direct investments.
📊
Key Findings & Data:For this purpose, the determinants of foreign direct investments inflows to Turkey from 19 countries over the period of 2002-2012 are examined by means of panel analysis through refining the “Gravity Model” by adding control variables and corruption indicators.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results indicate that the Turkish foreign direct investment inflows have both market and efficiency seeking patterns and corruption is a critical factor for the foreign direct investment inflows.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:2002-2012 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Çekim · yolsuzluk · doğrudan yabancı yatırım

Abstract

There is no consensus in the literature about the direction of the impact of corruption on foreign direct investments. The aim of this paper is to explore the likely effects of corruption on the foreign direct investments in Turkey. For this purpose, the determinants of foreign direct investments inflows to Turkey from 19 countries over the period of 2002-2012 are examined by means of panel analysis through refining the “Gravity Model” by adding control variables and corruption indicators. The results indicate that the Turkish foreign direct investment inflows have both market and efficiency seeking patterns and corruption is a critical factor for the foreign direct investment inflows.

Özet

Yolsuzluğun doğrudan yabancı yatırımlar üzerindeki etkisinin yönü konusunda literatürde bir görüş birliği bulunmamaktadır. Çalışmanın amacı Türkiye'de yolsuzluğun doğrudan yabancı yatırımlar üzerindeki muhtemel etkilerinin araştırılmasıdır. Bu amaçla, panel analiz yöntemi kullanmak suretiyle 2002-2012 arasında 19 ülkeden Türkiye’ye yapılan doğrudan yabancı yatırımların nedenleri “Çekim Modeli”ne, kontrol değişkenleri ve yolsuzluk göstergeleri eklenmek suretiyle incelenmiştir. Çalışma sonuçları Türkiye'ye gelen doğrudan yabancı yatırımların pazar ve etkinlik arama niteliği bulunduğuna ve yolsuzluğun doğrudan yabancı yatırımlar için belirleyici bir faktör olduğuna işaret etmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

YURDAKUL, M. O., TOSUN, U. (2022). AN INQUIRY ON THE LIKELY EFFECTS OF CORRUPTION ON THE FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENTS IN TURKEY. Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 34 - Sayı: 4, 71–96. https://ajindex.com/articles/533029

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Abed, G.T., H.R. Davoodi, (2000).
  2. Corruption, Structural Reforms and Economic Performance in the Transition Economies. IMF Working Paper, WP/00/132. Abotsi, A.K., T. Iyavarakul, (2015), “Tolerable Level of Corruption for Foreign Direct Investment in Africa”, Contemporary Economics, 9(3), 249–270.
  3. Aidt, S.T. (2003), “Economic Analysis of Corruption: A Survey”, The Economic Journal, 113(491), 632–652.
  4. Akan, Y., İ.Arslan (2007), “The Effect of Corruption on Foreign Direct Investment, the case of Turkey”, Lex ET Scientia International Journal, XIV, 200–206.
  5. Al Sadig, A. (2009), “The Effects of Corruption on FDI Inflows”, CATO Journal, 29(2), 267–294.
  6. Alesina, A., B. Weder (1999), Do Corrupt Governments Receive Less Foreign Aid?, National Bureau of Economic Research, Working Paper, No 7108, May. Asteriou, D. (2006), Applied Econometrics: A Modern Approach Using e-Views and Microfit, New York: Palgrave McMillan. Baldemir, E., Ö. İşçi, H. Görgülü (2005), MIMIC Model ve Yolsuzluk Üzerine Türkiye Uygulaması, VII. Ulusal Ekonometri ve İstatistik Sempozyumu, 26–27 Mayıs 2005,
  7. İstanbul Universitesi. Bardhan, P. (1997), “Corruption and Development: A Review of Issues”, Journal of Economic Literature, 35(3), 1320–1346.
  8. Bellos, S., T. Subasat (2013), “Corruption and Foreign Direct Investment: A panel Gravity Model Approach”, Bulletin of Economic Research, 64(4), 565–574.
  9. Bhagwati, J.N. (1982), “Directly Unproductive Profit Seeking (DUP) Activities”, Journal of Political Economy, 90, 988–1002.
  10. Campos, J. E., D. Lien, S. Pradhan (1999), “The Impact of Corruption on Investment: Predictability Matters”, World Development, 27(6), 1059–1076.
  11. Central Bank of Turkey (2015). Balance of Payments Statistics. Retrieved from http://www.tcmb.gov.tr/wps/wcm/connect/TCMB+EN/TCMB+EN/Main+Menu/STATISTICS/Balance+of+Payments+and+Related+Statistics/Balance+of+Payments+Statisticss/Data, E.T.: 24.12.2015.
  12. Coase, R.H. (1979), “Payola in Radio and Television Broadcasting”, Journal of Law and Economics, 22(2), 269–328.
  13. Conference Board (2015), Total Economy Database. Retrieved from https://www.conference-board.org/data/economydatabase/index.cfm?id=27762, E.T.: 25.11.2015.
  14. Dabla-Norris, E., J. Honda, A. Lahreche, G. Verdier (2010), FDI Flows to low-Income Countries: Global Drivers and Growth Implications, IMF Working Papers No 10/132. Dougherty, C. (2011), Introduction to Econometrics (4th ed.), New York: Oxford University Press.
  15. Dreher, A., M. Gassebner (2013), “Greasing the Wheels? The Impact o