Journals / Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 36 - Sayı: 1

THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ENERGY CONSUMPTION AND ECONOMIC GROWTH: THE CASE OF LOW AND MIDDLE INCOME COUNTRIES

ENERJİ TÜKETİMİ İLE EKONOMİK BÜYÜME ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİ: DÜŞÜK VE ORTA GELİRLİ ÜLKELER ÖRNEĞİ

Pages
1–15
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Empirical results indicate that the hypothesis of neutrality is mostly valid for the countries included in the low and middle income groups.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, the relationship between energy consumption and economic growth for low and middle income groups has been examined for the period 1971-2013.
📊
Key Findings & Data:For this purpose, the relationship between the variables is examined using Kónya panel causality test.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Empirical results indicate that the hypothesis of neutrality is mostly valid for the countries included in the low and middle income groups.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2013 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Ekonomik büyüme · enerji tüketimi · panel nedensellik testi

Abstract

In this study, the relationship between energy consumption and economic growth for low and middle income groups has been examined for the period 1971-2013. For this purpose, the relationship between the variables is examined using Kónya panel causality test. Empirical results indicate that the hypothesis of neutrality is mostly valid for the countries included in the low and middle income groups. Moreover, the feedback hypothesis is valid only for Kenya. As a result, it can be said that the direction of the causality relationship between energy consumption and economic growth with country and time dimension.

Özet

Bu çalışmada enerji tüketimi ve ekonomik büyüme arasındaki ilişki düşük ve orta gelir grubu ülkeler için 1971-2013 dönemi verileri kullanılarak incelenmiştir. Bu amaçla değişkenler arasındaki ilişki Kónya panel nedensellik testi kullanılarak incelenmiştir. Ampirik sonuçlara göre düşük ve orta gelir grubuna dâhil ülkelerde çoğunlukla tarafsızlık hipotezinin geçerli olduğu görülmektedir. Geribildirim hipotezinin ise yalnızca Kenya için geçerli olduğu çalışmadan elde edilen bir başka sonuçtur. Sonuç olarak ekonomik büyüme ile enerji tüketimi arasındaki nedensellik ilişkisinin yönü için zaman ve ülke boyutuna göre farklılaşmalar olduğunu söylemek mümkündür.

🔖

Cite This Article

AYDIN, M. (2022). THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ENERGY CONSUMPTION AND ECONOMIC GROWTH: THE CASE OF LOW AND MIDDLE INCOME COUNTRIES. Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 36 - Sayı: 1, 1–15. https://ajindex.com/articles/533002

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Al-Iriani, M.A. (2006), “Energy-GDP Relationship Revisited: an Example from GCC Countries using Panel Causality”, Energy Policy, 34 (17), 3342–3350.
  2. Apergis, N., J.E. Payne (2009), “Energy Consumption and Economic Growth in Central America: Evidence from a Panel Cointegration and Error Correction Model”, Energy Economics, 31, 211–216.
  3. Asafu-Adjaye, J. (2000), “The Relationship Between Energy Consumption, Energy Prices and Economic Growth: Time Series Evidence from Asian Developing Countries”, Energy Economics, 22, 615–625.
  4. Aydın, M. (2016), “Asimetrik Panel Nedensellik Testi: Gelişmekte Olan Ülkelerin Borsaları Üzerine Bir Uygulama”, Sakarya Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi. Belke, A., F. Dobnik, C. Dreger (2011), “Energy Consumption and Economic Growth: New Insights into the Cointegration Relationship”, Energy Econ., 30, 782–789.
  5. Coers, R., M. Sanders (2013), “The Energy-GDP Nexus; Addressing an Old Question with New Methods”, Energy Econ., 36, 708–715.
  6. Costantini, V., C. Martini (2010), “The Causality Between energy Consumption and Economic Growth: A Multi-Sectoral Analysis Using Non-Stationary Cointegrated Panel Data”, Energy Econ. 32(3), 591–603.
  7. Doğan, E. (2014), “Energy Consumption and Economic Growth: Evidence from Low-Income Countries in Sub-Saharan Africa”, International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 4(2), 154. Esseghir, A., L.H. Khouni (2014), “Economic Growth, Energy Consumption and Sustainable Development: The Case of the Union for the Mediterranean Countries”, Energy, 71, 214–225.
  8. Fuinhas, J.A., A.C. Marques (2012), “Energy Consumption and Economic Growth Nexus in Portugal, Italy, Greece, Spain, and Turkey: an ARDL bounds test approach (1965–2009)”, Energy Econ., 34, 511–517.
  9. Huang, B., M. Hwang, C. Yang (2008), “Causal relationship between energy consumption and GDP growth Revisited: A Dynamic Panel Data Approach”, Ecol. Econ., 67, 41–54.
  10. Kahsai, M.S., C. Nondo, P.V. Schaeffer, T.G. Gebremedhin (2012), “Income Level and the Energy Consumption-GDP Nexus: Evidence from Sub-Saharan Africa”, Energy Econ. 34(3), 739–746.
  11. Kasman, A., Y.S. Duman (2015), “CO2 Emissions, Economic Growth, Energy Consumption, Trade and Urbanization in New EU Member and Candidate Countries: A Panel Data Analysis”, Econ. Model., 44, 97–103. Kónya, L. (2006), “Exports and Growth: Granger Causality Analysis on OECD Countries with a Panel Data Approach”, Economic Modelling, (23), 978-992.
  12. Lee, C.C., C.P. Chang (2007), “Energy