Journals / Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 36 - Sayı: 3

IS THE STOCK MARKET A BAROMETER OF THE ECONOMY? THE CAUSALITY RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ECONOMIC ACTIVITY AND STOCK PRICES IN TURKEY

BORSA EKONOMİNİN BAROMETRESİ MİDİR? TÜRKİYE’DE EKONOMİK AKTİVİTE İLE HİSSE SENEDİ FİYATLARI ARASINDAKİ NEDENSELLİK İLİŞKİSİ

Pages
89–106
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This is a result supporting the view that the stock market is a barometer of the economy.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The relationship between the economy and the stock market has long been an important subject of economic research.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In the study, the causality relationship between economic activity and stock prices in Turkey is investigated using quartely data for the period 2000-2016.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This is a result supporting the view that the stock market is a barometer of the economy.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2000-2016 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Ekonomik aktivite · borsa · hisse senedi fiyatları

Abstract

The relationship between the economy and the stock market has long been an important subject of economic research. The observed relationship between the fluctuations in stock prices and economic activity has led to a widespread view that the stock market is a barometer of the economy. This view is tested in this study. In the study, the causality relationship between economic activity and stock prices in Turkey is investigated using quartely data for the period 2000-2016. Toda-Yamamoto causality test is used in the empirical analysis. The results of the causality tests show that there is unidirectional causality running from stock prices to economic activity in Turkey. This is a result supporting the view that the stock market is a barometer of the economy.

Özet

Ekonomi ile borsa arasındaki ilişki uzun zamandır önemli bir ekonomik araştırma konusu olmuştur. Hisse senedi fiyatları ile ekonomik aktivitedeki dalgalanmalar arasında gözlenen ilişki, borsanın ekonominin barometresi olduğu şeklinde yaygın bir görüşün ortaya çıkmasına yol açmıştır. Bu çalışmada bu görüş test edilmiştir. Çalışmada Türkiye’deki ekonomik aktivite ile hisse senedi fiyatları arasındaki nedensellik ilişkisi, üç aylık veriler kullanılarak, 2000-2016 dönemi için araştırılmıştır. Ampirik analizde Toda-Yamamoto nedensellik testi kullanılmıştır. Nedensellik testlerinin sonuçları, Türkiye’de hisse senedi fiyatlarından ekonomik aktiviteye doğru tek yönlü nedensellik olduğunu göstermektedir. Bu, borsanın ekonominin barometresi olduğu görüşünü destekleyen bir sonuçtur.

🔖

Cite This Article

KARACA, O. (2022). IS THE STOCK MARKET A BAROMETER OF THE ECONOMY? THE CAUSALITY RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ECONOMIC ACTIVITY AND STOCK PRICES IN TURKEY. Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 36 - Sayı: 3, 89–106. https://ajindex.com/articles/532998

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Abdullah, D.A., S.C. Hayworth (1993), “Macroeconometrics of Stock Price Fluctuations”, Quarterly Journal of Business and Economics, 32(1), 50-67.
  2. Adrangi, B., A. Chatrath, K. Raffiee (1999), “Inflation, Output and Stock Prices: Evidence from Two Major Emerging Markets”, Journal of Economics and Finance, 23(3), 266-278.
  3. Ando, A., F. Modigliani (1963), “The ‘Life-Cycle’ Hypothesis of Saving: Aggregate Implications and Tests”, The American Economic Review, 53(1), 55-84.
  4. Barro, R.J. (1990), “The Stock Market and Investment”, The Review of Financial Studies, 3(1), 115-131.
  5. Bram, J., S. Ludvigson (1998), “Does Consumer Confidence Forecast Household Expenditure? A Sentiment Index Horse Race”, Economic Policy Review, 4(2), 59-78.
  6. Carroll, C.D., J.C. Fuhrer, D.W. Wilcox (1994), “Does Consumer Sentiment Forecast Household Spending? If So, Why?”, The American Economic Review, 84(5), 1397-1408.
  7. Chen, N., R. Roll, S.A. Ross (1986), “Economic Forces and the Stock Market”, The Journal of Business, 59(3), 383-403.
  8. Dickey, D.A., W.A. Fuller (1979), “Distributions of the Estimators for Autoregressive Time Series with a Unit Root”, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 74(366), 427-431.
  9. Dickey, D.A., W.A. Fuller (1981), “Likelihood Ratio Statistics for Autoregressive Time Series with a Unit Root”, Econometrica, 49(4), 1057-1072.
  10. Duca, G. (2007), “The Relationship between the Stock Market and the Economy: Experience from International Financial Markets”, Bank of Valletta Review, 36, 1-12.
  11. Elmas, B., İ. Göçer, H. Aksu (2011), “İMKB Performansı-Ekonomik Büyüme Oranı Arasındaki İlişki: 1998:Ç1-2010:Ç3 Dönemi”, Kocaeli Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 22, 152-167.
  12. Fama, E.F. (1981), “Stock Returns, Real Activity, Inflation and Money”, The American Economic Review, 71(4), 545-565.
  13. Fama, E.F. (1990), “Stock Returns, Expected Returns and Real Activity”, The Journal of Finance, 45(4), 1089-1108.
  14. Fischer, S., R.C. Merton (1984), Macroeconomics and Finance: The Role of the Stock Market, National Bureau of Economic Research, Working Paper, No 1291. Galbraith, J.K. (1955), The Great Crash 1929, Boston: Houghton Mifflin. Gallinger, G.W. (1994), “Causality Tests of the Real Stock Return-Real Activity Hypothesis”, The Journal of Financial Research, 17(2), 271-288.
  15. Granger, C.W.J. (1969), “Investigating Causal Relations by Econometric Models: Cross Spectral Methods”, Econometrica, 37(3), 424-438.
  16. Granger, C.W.J., P. Newbold (1974), “Spurious Regressions in Econometr