Journals / Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 36 - Sayı: 4

ANALYSIS OF PRICE RIGITIY IN TURKEY BY FAVAR

TÜRKİYE EKONOMİSİ FİYAT KATILIKLARININ FAVAR MODELİ İLE ANALİZİ

Pages
75–94
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Our analysis revealed that share of common components in price setting process in Turkey is inconsistent with high degree of price rigidity.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:New Keynesian economic theory is built on the assumption that prices and wages are sticky.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In order to explain the disgreement between macro and micro data, we developed a FAVAR model (Bernanke, Boivin ve Eliasz, 2005) and computed the common and sector specific components for Turkish economy from 2005:01 to 2014:12.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Our analysis revealed that share of common components in price setting process in Turkey is inconsistent with high degree of price rigidity.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:2005 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Fiyat Katılıkları · FAVAR · Yeni Keynesyen Ekonomi

Abstract

New Keynesian economic theory is built on the assumption that prices and wages are sticky. Despite the aggregate data supporting the sticky prices assumption, micro data indicate that disagregated prices change much faster than conventionally assumed. In order to explain the disgreement between macro and micro data, we developed a FAVAR model (Bernanke, Boivin ve Eliasz, 2005) and computed the common and sector specific components for Turkish economy from 2005:01 to 2014:12. Our analysis revealed that share of common components in price setting process in Turkey is inconsistent with high degree of price rigidity.

Özet

Fiyatların ve ücretlerin katı olduğu varsayımı üzerine inşa edilmiş Yeni Keynesyen iktisat teorisine göre para nötr değildir ve parasal genişleme ekonomide reel sonuçlar üretir. Her ne kadar toplulaştırılmış veriler fiyat katılığı varsayımını desteklese de, mikro veriler incelendiğinde toplulaştırılmamış fiyatların geleneksel olarak varsayılandan çok daha değişken olduğu görülmüştür. Makro ve mikro veriler arasındaki bu uyumsuzluğu açıklamak için, bir FAVAR modeli (Bernanke, Boivin ve Eliasz, 2005) geliştirilmiş ve fiyat değişimlerinde sektöre özgü ve ortak bileşenlerin payı 2005:01-2014:12 ekonomik verileri kullanılarak hesaplanmıştır. Yaptığımız bu analize göre, Türkiye’de fiyatların belirlenmesinde ortak bileşenlerin payı, yüksek bir fiyat katılık derecesine imkan vermeyecek kadar büyüktür.

🔖

Cite This Article

DEMİRÖZ, D. M., KÜÇÜKEFE, B. (2022). ANALYSIS OF PRICE RIGITIY IN TURKEY BY FAVAR. Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 36 - Sayı: 4, 75–94. https://ajindex.com/articles/532992

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Abdioğlu, Z.: (2010).Yeni Keynesyenlerde Fiyat ve Ücret Katılıkları: Türkiye Örneği, Doktora Tezi, Karadeniz Teknik Üniversitesi Alvarez, L.J. ve Dhyne, E., H. (2005). Sticky Prices in the Euro Area: A summary of new Micro Evidence, ECB Working Paper, No: 63. Bai, J., Kunpeng, L., Lu, L. (2014).Estimation and Inference of FAVAR Models, MPRA Paper No. 60960, Erişim adresi Online: http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/60960/
  2. Belke, A., Rees, A. (2014).Globalization and Monetary Policy – A FAVAR analysis for the G7 and the eurozone, The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 29, 306-321.
  3. Bernanke, B., Blinder A. (1992).The Federal Funds Rate and the Channels of Monetary Transmission, American Economic Review, 82, 901-921.
  4. Bernanke, B., Gertler, M., Watson, M. (1997).Systematic Monetary Policy And The Effects Of Oil Price Shocks, Brookings Papers On Economic Activity, 1997:1, 91-142
  5. Bernanke, B., Mihov, I. (1998).The Liquidity Effect And Long-Run Neutrality, Carnegie Rochester Conference Series On Public Policy, 49, 149-194.
  6. Bernanke, B., Boivin, J. (2003).Monetary Policy İn A Data-Rich Environment, Journal Of Monetary Economics, 50:3, 525-546.
  7. Bernanke, B., Boivin, J., Elıasz, P. (2005).Measuring the Effects of Monetary Policy: A Factor-Augmented Vector Autoregressive (FAVAR) Approach., Quarterly Journal of Economics, 120(1), 387-422.
  8. Bils, M., Klenow, P. J. (2004).Some Evidence On The Importance Of Sticky Prices, Journal Of Political Economy, 112(5), 947-985.
  9. Boivin, J., Giannoni, M. P., Mihov, I. (2009).Sticky Prices And Monetary Policy: Evidence From Disaggregated Us Data, American Economic Review, 99:1, 350-384.
  10. Boivin, J., Ng, S. (2005).Understanding And Comparing Factor-Based Forecasts, International Journal Of Central Banking, 1(3), 117-151.
  11. Calvo, G. A. (1983).Staggered Prices İn A Utility-Maximizing Framework, Journal Of Monetary Economics, 12, 383-398.
  12. Fernald, J.G., Spiegel, M.M., Swanson, E.T. (2014).Monetary policy effectiveness in China: Evidence from a FAVAR model, Journal of International Money and Finance, 49(A), 83-103
  13. Fischer, S. (1977)
  14. Long-Term Contracts, Rational Expectations, and the Optimal Mone Supply Rule, Journal of Political Economy, 85(1), 191-205.
  15. Fukawa, K.: (2012). Estimation of an empirical FAVAR model and DSGE model for evaluating effects of government spending in Japan, Doktora tezi, City University of New York Golosov, M., Lucas R.E. (2007).
  16. Menu Costs and Phillips Curves, Journal of Political Economy, 115, 171-199. Gupt