Journals / Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 36 - Sayı: 4

EFFECT OF SOME MACROECONOMIC VARIABLES ON RISK PERCEPTION: THE TURKISH CASE

Pages
117–147
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Also according to cointegration coefficient there is positive relationship between Foreign Exchange and CDS spread but we couldn’t support statistically significant relationship between Current Account and CDS spread.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Recently Turkish economy is classified ‘fragile five’ with Brazil, India, Indonesia and South Africa because of some structural deficiencies and imbalances in its macroeconomic variables.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This study examines the determinants of CDS spread by using time series analysis for the period of 2011-2017 monthly data.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Also according to cointegration coefficient there is positive relationship between Foreign Exchange and CDS spread but we couldn’t support statistically significant relationship between Current Account and CDS spread.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:2011-2017 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Kredi Temerrüt Takası · Cari Açık · Döviz Kuru

Abstract

Recently Turkish economy is classified ‘fragile five’ with Brazil, India, Indonesia and South Africa because of some structural deficiencies and imbalances in its macroeconomic variables. Turkey’s fragility can be observed or measured from some economic indicators and one of them is Credit Default Swap (CDS) spread. It represents default probability of Turkish economy and it’s affected by many macroeconomic indicators. This study examines the determinants of CDS spread by using time series analysis for the period of 2011-2017 monthly data. On that note the relationships between the variables were tested with Johansen cointegration test to determine relationship in the long run . After determining long term relationship between the variables, the VECM (Vector Error Correction) model in cointegration framework was estimated in order to determine short term relationship. Lastly Granger test under VECM was applied in order to establish the uni or bi-directional causality between variables. In this frame we conclude that there is granger causality which directed from Current Account to Foreign Exchange and Foreign Exchange to CDS spread like a knock on effect. Also according to cointegration coefficient there is positive relationship between Foreign Exchange and CDS spread but we couldn’t support statistically significant relationship between Current Account and CDS spread.

Özet

Türkiye ekonomisi bazı yapısal yetersizlikler ve makroekonomik değişkenlerindeki bazı dengesizlikler nedeniyle yükselen piyasa ekonomileri içinde Brezilya, Endonezya, G. Afrika ve Hindistan ile birlikte kırılgan beşli olarak da adlandırılan ekonomilerden biri olarak gösterilmektedir. Söz konusu kırılganlığı birtakım ekonomik değişkenler üzerinden gözlemleyebilmek yada ölçebilmek mümkündür. Bu değişkenlerden birisi olan Kredi Temerrüt Takası (CDS) Türkiye’nin borçlarını ödeyememe ihtimalini yansıtmakta ve diğer makro değişkenlerden etkilenmektedir. Bu çalışma 2011-2017 dönemi aylık verilerini zaman serisi analiz yöntemleriyle kullanarak CDS üzerindeki belirleyiciliğini inceleyecektir. Bu bağlamda değişkeneler arasındaki uzun dönemli ilişkiler Johansen eş bütünleşme testi ile araştırılmıştır. Değişkenler arasında uzun dönemli ilişki belirlendikten sonra eşbütünleşme çerçevesinde VECM modeli ile kısa dönemli dinamikler incelenmiştir. Son olarak değişkenler arasında tek yada çift yönlü nedensellik ilişkisi olup olmadığı VECM nedensellik testi ile araştırılmıştır. Bu çerçevede tıpkı bir zincirin halkaları gibi cari açık değişkeninden kur değişkenine ve kur değişkeninde CDS değişkenine Granger nedensellik ilişkisi tespit edilmiştir. Ayrıca eşbütünleşme katsayıları, döviz kuru değişkeni ile CDS değişkeni arasında pozitif ilişkiye işaret ederken, cari açık değişkeni ile CDS değişkeni arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir ilişki tespit edilememiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

YILMAZ, A., ÜNLÜ, A. (2022). EFFECT OF SOME MACROECONOMIC VARIABLES ON RISK PERCEPTION: THE TURKISH CASE. Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 36 - Sayı: 4, 117–147. https://ajindex.com/articles/532979

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Ahking, F. (2001), Model Mis-Specification And Johansen’s Co-Integration Analysis: An Application To The US Money Demand, Journal of Macroeconomics 24 (2002) 51–66.
  2. Aizenman, J., Binici, M., Hutchison, M., M. (2014), "The Transmission of Federal Reserve Tapering News to Emerging Financial Markets," NBER Working Papers 19980, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc. Anton S., G. (2011), The Local Determinants Of Emerging Market Sovereign Cds Spreads In The Context Of The Debt Crisis. An Explanatory Study, Analele Stintifice Universitatii "Alexandru Ioan Cuza" din Iasi - Stiinte Economice, 2011, vol. 58, 41-52.
  3. Akal, M. (2014), Explaining Turkey's Intermediate Goods Imports Demand And Estimating Elasticities: Industrial Countries, Journal of Economic Cooperation, October-2014, 1-19.
  4. Annaert, J., Ceuster, M., Van Roy, P., Vespro, C., 2013. What Determines Euro Area Bank CDS Spreads? Journal of International Money and Finance 32, 444–461.
  5. Attradius Economic Research (2015), US Interest Rate Rise: Emerging Markets At Risk, file:///C:/Users/ADU-5/Downloads/Atradius_Economic_ResearchUS_interest_rate_EMs_at_risk_ERN121501 en.pdf, Atradius Economic Research - December 2015.
  6. Baltacı, N. Akyol, H. (2016), Examination of the Macroeconomic Variables affecting Credit Default Swaps, Journal of Economics Bibliography, Vol. 3 December 2016 Issue 4. Başarır, Ç., Erçakar, M., E. (2016), An Analysis of the Relationship Between Crude Oil Prices, Current Account Deficit and Exchange Rate, International Journal of Economics and Finance, Vol. 8, No:11, ISSN: 1916-971X. Baum, C., F. (2013),
  7. VAR, SVAR and VECM models, Applied Econometrics, http://fmwww.bc.edu/EC-C/S2013/823/EC823.S2013.nn10.slides.pdf
  8. Bhansali, V., Gingrich, R., Longstaff, F. (2008), Systemic Credit Risk: What Is The Market Telling Us? Financial Analysts Journal 64, 16–24.
  9. Binh, T. P. (2013),
  10. Unit Root Tests, Cointegration, Ecm, Vecm, And Causality Models, Topics In Time Series Econometrics. BIS, (2016), International Banking and Financial Market Developments, Bank of International Settlement Quarterly Review, December 2016.
  11. Breitenfellner, B., Wagner, N. (2012), Explaining Aggregate Credit Default Swap Spreads, International Review of Financial Analysis 22 (2012) 18–29.
  12. Brooks, C. (2008), Introductory Econometrics for Finance, Cambridge University Press, http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511841644.
  13. Brüggemann, R. (2002), On the Small Sample Properties of Weak Exogeneity Tests in Cointegrated VAR Models, http://ed