Journals / Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 37 - Sayı: 2

THE CORRELATION BETWEEN CORRUPTION AND SOCIOECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT: AN APPLICATION FOR OECD COUNTRIES

YOLSUZLUK VE SOSYO EKONOMİK GELİŞME İLİŞKİSİ: OECD ÜLKELERİ İÇİN BİR UYGULAMA

Pages
325–339
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The 2013 data for the thirty-four countries were tested using discriminant analysis in the study.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Corruption is an ancient phenomenon that weakens all functions of the government, directly affects its monetary and fiscal policies, and causes permanent social and economic problems by disrupting human capital.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Corruption can cause structural problems (e.g., unemployment, unfair distribution of income) to deepen, slow economic growth, weaken human development and lead to insecurity and social unrest.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The 2013 data for the thirty-four countries were tested using discriminant analysis in the study.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2013 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Yolsuzluk · Ekonomik Gelişme · Beşeri Sermaye

Abstract

Corruption is an ancient phenomenon that weakens all functions of the government, directly affects its monetary and fiscal policies, and causes permanent social and economic problems by disrupting human capital. Corruption can cause structural problems (e.g., unemployment, unfair distribution of income) to deepen, slow economic growth, weaken human development and lead to insecurity and social unrest. Statistical analysis of this concept, which is of great economic significance, was an important source of motivation for the present study. The current study aimed to categorize the nations based on corruption levels and to identify the discriminating economic variables effective in this categorization. Thus, various economic variables that affect the level of corruption in OECD countries, including Turkey, were evaluated. The 2013 data for the thirty-four countries were tested using discriminant analysis in the study.

Özet

Yolsuzluk, devletin tüm işlevlerini zayıflatan, para ve maliye politikalarını doğrudan etkileyen ve beşeri sermayeye zarar vererek kalıcı sosyal ve ekonomik problemlere yol açan eski bir olgudur. Yolsuzluk, ülkelerde var olan yapısal problemlerin (işsizlik, adaletsiz gelir dağılımı gibi) derinleşmesine, ekonomik gelişmenin yavaşlamasına neden olabilmekte, insani gelişmeyi zayıflatarak, güvensizlik ortamı ve toplumsal huzursuzluklara yol açmaktadır. Bu çalışmada ülkelerin yolsuzluk düzeylerine göre gruplandırılması ve bu gruplandırmada etkili olan ayırt edici ekonomik değişkenlerin tespit edilmesi amaçlanmıştır. Bu bağlamda ülkemizin de üyesi olduğu OECD ülkeleri için yolsuzluk düzeyini etkileyen çeşitli ekonomik değişkenler değerlendirilmiştir. Araştırma kapsamında otuz dört ülkeye ilişkin derlenen 2013 yılı verileri diskriminant analizi kullanılarak test edilmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

MURAT, D., İNAM, B., GÜZEL, S. (2022). THE CORRELATION BETWEEN CORRUPTION AND SOCIOECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT: AN APPLICATION FOR OECD COUNTRIES. Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 37 - Sayı: 2, 325–339. https://ajindex.com/articles/532961

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Ahmad, E., M.A. Ullah, M.I. Arfeen (2012), “Does Corruption Affect Economic Growth?”, Latin American Journal of Economics, 49(2), 277-305.
  2. Akçay, S. (2006), “Corruption and Human Development”, Cato Journal, 26(1), 29-48.
  3. Alesina, A., S. 0zler, N. Roubini, P. Swagel (1992), Political Instability and Economic Growth, NBER Working Paper Series, No. 4173. Ariely, G., E.M. Uslaner (2017), “Corruption, Fairness and Inequality”, International Political Science Review, 38(3), 349-362.
  4. Bakırtaş, D. (2012), “Yolsuzluğun Vergi Gelirleri Üzerindeki Etkisi: Türkiye Örneği”, Yönetim ve Ekonomi, 19(2), 88-98.
  5. Bardhan, P. (2006), “The Economist’s Approach to the Problem of Corruption”, World Development, 34(2), 341–348.
  6. Barreto, R.A. (2001),
  7. Endogenous Corruption, Inequality And Growth: Econometric Evidence, Adelaide University, Working Paper 01-2. http://www.economics.adelaide.edu.au/research/papers/doc/wp2001-02.pdf, D.A.: 17.08.2017
  8. Bouzid, B.N. (2016), Dynamic Relationship Between Corruption And Youth Unemployment. Empirical Evidences From A System Gmm Approach, Policy Reseach Working Paper 7842, http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/916781475156227542/Dynamic-Relationship-Between-Corruption-and-Youth-Unemployment-Empirical-Evidences-From-a-System-GMM-Approach, D.A.: 17.08.2017.
  9. Eicher, T., C.G., Penalosa, T. Ypersele (2009), “Education, Corruption and the Distribution of Income”, Journal of Economic Growth, 14(3), 205-231.
  10. Fernandez, M.G., C.G. Velasco (2014), “Shadow Economy, Corruption and Public Debt in Spain”, Journal of Policy Modeling, 36, 1101-1117.
  11. Gupta, S., H. Davoodi, R.A. Terme (1998), Does Corruption Affect Income Inequality and Poverty?, IMF Working Paper, WP/98/76. https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/wp/wp9876.pdf, D.A.: 09.08.2017.
  12. Gupta, S., H. Davoodi, E. Tiongso (2000), Corruption and Provision of Health Care and Education Services, IMF Working Paper, WP/00/116. IMF (2016),
  13. IMF Staff Discussion Note, Corruption: Costs and Mitigating Strategies, SDN/16/05. Ivanyna, M., A. Moumouras, P. Rangazas (2015),
  14. Corruption, Public Debt and Economic Growth. https://msu.edu/~ivanynam/research/corr_debt/Ivanyna_Mourmouras_Rangazas_Corruption_Public_Debt_2015.pdf, D.A.: 09.08.2017.
  15. Johnson, D.E. (1998), Applied Multivariate Methods for Data Analysis, Duxbury: California. Johnson, R.A., D.W. Wichern (1998), Applied Multivariate Statistical Analysis (4th ed), New Jersey: Prentice-Hall Inc. Karagöz, K., M. Karagöz (2010), “Yolsuzluk, Ekonomik Büyüme ve Kamu Har