Journals / Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 37 - Sayı: 1

THE ROLE OF SOCIAL INNOVATION AND SOCIAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP IN THE FUTURE OF SOCIAL WORK PROFESSION

SOSYAL İNOVASYONUN VE SOSYAL GİRİŞİMCİLİĞİN SOSYAL HİZMET MESLEĞİNİN GELECEĞİNDEKİ ROLÜ

Pages
169–187
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Therefore, social innovation and social entrepreneurship should be encouraged as a series of new strategies developed by social workers for social problems.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Social innovation and social entrepreneurship have begun to be referred as two new concepts in social work terminology.
📊
Key Findings & Data:We must go beyond the traditional methods to share new information with those who want to benefit from the theoretical approaches and practices of the profession.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Therefore, social innovation and social entrepreneurship should be encouraged as a series of new strategies developed by social workers for social problems.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Sosyal inovasyon · sosyal girişimcilik · sosyal hizmet mesleği

Abstract

Social innovation and social entrepreneurship have begun to be referred as two new concepts in social work terminology. We must go beyond the traditional methods to share new information with those who want to benefit from the theoretical approaches and practices of the profession. The new transformation and practice processes of social workers working with vulnerable groups can be defined as social innovation. The new methods and techniques used by social workers can be defined as social entrepreneurship. This article aims to discuss the role of social innovation and social entrepreneurship in social welfare services and especially in the practice of the social work profession. Social innovation and social entrepreneurship can present different and promising perspectives on scaling social problems. Therefore, social innovation and social entrepreneurship should be encouraged as a series of new strategies developed by social workers for social problems.

Özet

Sosyal inovasyon ve sosyal girişimcilik, sosyal hizmet terminolojisinde iki yeni kavram olarak anılmaya başlamıştır. Mesleğin kuramsal yaklaşım ve uygulamalarından yararlanmak isteyen kişilerle yeni bilgileri paylaşmak için geleneksel yöntemlerin dışına çıkılması gerekir. Sosyal çalışmacıların incinebilir gruplarla çalışırken geçirdiği dönüşümü ve süreci sosyal inovasyon, kullandığı yeni yöntem ve teknikleri ise sosyal girişimcilik başlığı altında değerlendirmeliyiz. Bu makalenin amacı, sosyal inovasyonun ve sosyal girişimciliğin genelde sosyal refah hizmetlerinde özelde sosyal hizmet mesleğinin uygulamalarında oynayacağı rolü tartışmaya açmaktır. Sosyal inovasyon ve sosyal girişimcilik sosyal sorunları ölçeklendirmede farklı bakış açıları sunabilir. Dolayısıyla sosyal inovasyon ve sosyal girişimcilik; sosyal çalışmacıların toplumsal sorunlara yönelik geliştirdiği bir dizi yeni strateji olarak teşvik edilmelidir.

🔖

Cite This Article

TUNCAY, T., YILDIRIM, B. (2022). THE ROLE OF SOCIAL INNOVATION AND SOCIAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP IN THE FUTURE OF SOCIAL WORK PROFESSION. Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 37 - Sayı: 1, 169–187. https://ajindex.com/articles/532951

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Akbaş, E., T. Tuncay (2005), “Ortak Sorumluluk Zamanı”, Radikal İki, 27/11/2005.
  2. Atkins, P., M. Frederico (2017), “Supporting Implementation of Innovative Social Work Practice: What Factors Really Matter?. British Journal of Social Work, 47(6), 1723-1744.
  3. Austin, J., H. Stevenson, J. Wei‐Skillern (2006), “Social and Commercial Entrepreneurship: Same, Different, or Both?”, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30(1), 1-22.
  4. Bahar, O.S. (2017), “A Promising Partnership: Uncovering the Middle Ground Between Social Innovation and Social Work Response to Dr. Marilyn l. Flynn’s Remarks”, Research on Social Work Practice, 27(2), 131-133.
  5. Baker, S., A. Mehmood (2015), “Social Innovation and the Governance of Sustainable Places”, Local Environment, 20(3), 321-334.
  6. Cajaiba-Santana, G. (2014), “Social Innovation: Moving the Field Forward. A Conceptual Framework”, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 82, 42-51.
  7. Choi, N., S. Majumdar (2014), “Social Entrepreneurship As An Essentially Contested Concept: Opening A New Avenue For Systematic Future Research”, Journal of Business Venturing, 29(3), 363-376.
  8. Defourny, J., M. Nyssens (2010), “Conceptions of Social Enterprise and Social Entrepreneurship in Europe and the United States: Convergences and Divergences”, Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 1(1), 32-53.
  9. Duyan, V. (2010), Sosyal Hizmet: Temelleri, Yaklaşımları, Müdahale Yöntemleri, (Birinci basım), Ankara: Sosyal Hizmet Uzmanları Derneği Genel Merkezi Yayınları.
  10. Ersen, T.B., A. Ekmekçi (2013), "Sosyal Girişimcilik ve Türkiye", Stanford Social İnnovation Review Dergisi, 10.yıl Özel Sayısı, 6-8. https://www.anadoluvakfi.org.tr/upload/publications/pdfs/567eb73599f045.70852149 pdf, E.T.: 21.09.2018.
  11. Flynn, M.L. (2017), “Science, Innovation, and Social Work: Clash or Convergence?”, Research on Social Work Practice, 27(2), 123-128.
  12. Germak, A. (2017), If Steve Jobs Had Been A Social Worker. http://www.socialworker.com/feature-articles/practice/if-steve-jobs-had-been-a-social-worker/, E.T.: 01.02.2017.
  13. Halvorsen, C. J. (2016), “Bridging Social Innovation and Social Work Balancing Science, Values, and Speed”, Research on Social Work Practice, 27(2), 129-130.
  14. Hofstede, G. (2001), Culture’s Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviours, Institutions and Organizastions Across Nations, (2nd ed.), London: Sage. Hofstede, G. (2011), “Dimensionalizing Cultures: The Hofstede Model in Context”. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 2(1), article 8. Mair, J. ve Marti, I. (2006)