SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 38 - Sayı: 3

BEHAVIORAL ECONOMICS AND NUDGE: A STUDY ON HEALTH POLICIES

DAVRANIŞSAL İKTİSAT VE DÜRTME: SAĞLIK POLİTİKALARI ÖZELİNDE BİR İNCELEME

Havva SERİM
Serkan KÜÇÜKŞENEL
Pages
531–559
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Finally, we show that nudging methods such as educational intervention and persuasion, restructuring the environment and creating commitment mechanisms can be used in the prevention of obesity disease.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study shows that basic behavioral economics nudging methods can be used to develop healthy lifestyle behaviors.
📊
Key Findings & Data:For this purpose, first, behavioral economics studies revealing that people are often subject to bounded rationality, bounded self-control or bounded self-interest are examined.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Finally, we show that nudging methods such as educational intervention and persuasion, restructuring the environment and creating commitment mechanisms can be used in the prevention of obesity disease.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:davranışsal iktisat · dürtme · sağlık politikaları

Abstract

This study shows that basic behavioral economics nudging methods can be used to develop healthy lifestyle behaviors. For this purpose, first, behavioral economics studies revealing that people are often subject to bounded rationality, bounded self-control or bounded self-interest are examined. Second, the effects of these biases on health behavior are identified. Finally, we show that nudging methods such as educational intervention and persuasion, restructuring the environment and creating commitment mechanisms can be used in the prevention of obesity disease.

Özet

Bu çalışma, temel davranışsal iktisat dürtme yöntemlerinin sağlıklı yaşam biçimi davranışlarının geliştirilmesi için kullanılabileceğini göstermektedir. Bu amaçla öncelikle insanların sıklıkla sınırlı rasyonalite, sınırlı otokontrol veya sınırlı bencilliğe tabi olduğunu ortaya koyan davranışsal iktisat çalışmaları incelenmiştir. Daha sonra bu tarz rasyonel davranış varsayımından sapmaların sağlık davranışı üzerindeki etkileri belirlenmiştir. Son olarak, eğitsel müdahale ve ikna etme, ortamı yeniden yapılandırma ve taahhüt mekanizmaları oluşturma gibi dürtme yöntemlerinin obezite hastalığının önlenmesinde kullanılabileceği gösterilmiştir

🔖

Cite This Article

SERİM, H., KÜÇÜKŞENEL, S. (2022). BEHAVIORAL ECONOMICS AND NUDGE: A STUDY ON HEALTH POLICIES. Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 38 - Sayı: 3, 531–559. https://ajindex.com/articles/532943

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Adonis, L., Paramanund, J., Basu, D., & Luiz, J. (2017). Framing preventive care messaging and cervical cancer screening in a health-insured population in South Africa: Implications for population-based communication?. Journal of Health Psychology, 22(11), 1365-1375.
  2. Andreoni J. ve Miller, J.H. (2002). Giving according to GARP: An experimental test of the consistency of preferences for altruism. Econometrica, 70:737–753.
  3. Bryan, G., Karlan, D., & Nelson, S. (2010). Commitment devices. Annu. Rev. Econ., 2(1), 671-698.
  4. Cawley, J.H. (2011). The Oxford Handbook of the Social Science of Obesity. New York, United States: Oxford University Press.
  5. Chapman, G. B., Li, M., Colby, H., & Yoon, H. (2010). Opting in vs opting out of influenza vaccination. Jama, 304(1), 43-44.
  6. Christakis, N. A., & Fowler, J. H. (2007). The spread of obesity in a large social network over 32 years. New England Journal of Medicine, 357(4), 370-379.
  7. Cialdini, R. B., Demaine, L. J., Sagarin, B. J., Barrett, D. W., Rhoads, K., & Winter, P. L. (2006). Managing social norms for persuasive impact. Social influence, 1(1), 3-15.
  8. Cislaghi, B., & Heise, L. (2019). Using social norms theory for health promotion in low-income countries. Health Promotion International, 34, 616-623.
  9. Consedine, N. S., Horton, D., Magai, C., & Kukafka, R. (2007). Breast screening in response to gain, loss, and empowerment framed messages among diverse, low-income women. Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved, 18(3), 550-566.
  10. Datta, S. & Mullainathan, S. (2014). Behavioral design: a new approach to development policy. Review of Income and Wealth, 60(1), 7-35.
  11. DellaVigna, S. (2009). Psychology and Economics: Evidence from the Field. Journal of Economic Literature, 47(2), 315-372.
  12. Dhami, S. (2016). The Foundations of Behavioral Economic Analysis. Oxford University Press:
  13. New York. Dolan, P., Hallsworth, M., Halpern, D., King, D., & Vlaev, I. (2010). MINDSPACE: Influencing behaviour for public policy. Institute for Government Report for the Cabinet Office, UK. Downs, J. S., Loewenstein, G., & Wisdom, J. (2009). Strategies for promoting healthier food choices. American Economic Review, 99(2), 159-164.
  14. Elster, J. (2007). Explaining social behavior: More nuts and bolts for the social sciences. Cambridge University Press:
  15. Cambridge. Fehr, E. ve Schmidt, K.M. (1999). A theory of fairness, competition and cooperation. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114(3):817–868.
  16. Fogarty, A. W., Sturrock, N., Premji, K., & Prinsloo, P