SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 38 - Sayı: 3

THE EFFECT OF ILLIQUIDITY PREMIUM ON STOCK RETURNS: EVIDENCE FROM BORSA ISTANBUL

PAY GETİRİLERİNDE LİKİDİTE AZLIK PRİMİ ETKİSİ: BORSA İSTANBUL UYGULAMASI

Semra BANK
Elif KAHRAMAN
Pages
465–486
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In other words, the findings show that there is no relationship between investor decisions and illiquidity premium.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this study is to investigate the existence of illiquidity premium in the Borsa Istanbul (BIST).
📊
Key Findings & Data:Within the scope of this objective, the illiquidity premium is investigated using zero return measure developed by Lesmond et al. (1999) and ILLIQ criterion introduced by Amihud (2002) with regression analysis over Liquidity Adjusted Capital Asset Pricing Model (LCAPM) for the period of January 2002-September 2018.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In other words, the findings show that there is no relationship between investor decisions and illiquidity premium.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:2002 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Likidite · Likidite Azlık Primi · LFVFM

Abstract

The aim of this study is to investigate the existence of illiquidity premium in the Borsa Istanbul (BIST). Within the scope of this objective, the illiquidity premium is investigated using zero return measure developed by Lesmond et al. (1999) and ILLIQ criterion introduced by Amihud (2002) with regression analysis over Liquidity Adjusted Capital Asset Pricing Model (LCAPM) for the period of January 2002-September 2018. The results of the analysis obtained from 20 portfolios based on illiquidity indicators revealed that the illiquidity risk premium did not have a significant effect on the expected rate of return in the BIST in the related time period. In other words, the findings show that there is no relationship between investor decisions and illiquidity premium.

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı, likidite azlık priminin mevcudiyetinin Borsa İstanbul (BIST) Pay Piyasası’nda araştırılmasıdır. Bu amaç kapsamında, likidite azlık primi, Ocak 2002-Eylül 2018 dönem aralığında, sıfır getirili ölçüt ve likidite azlık ölçütü (ILLIQ) aracılığıyla, Acharya ve Pedersen (2005) Likidite Ayarlı Finansal Varlık Fiyatlandırma Modeli (LFVFM) üzerinden regresyon analizi ile test edilmiştir. Likidite azlık göstergelerine göre oluşturulan 20 adet portföyden elde edilen analiz sonuçları BIST Pay Piyasası’nda ilgili dönem aralığında likidite azlık priminin beklenen getiri oranı üzerinde anlamlı bir etkiye sahip olmadığını ortaya koymuştur. Diğer bir ifadeyle, elde edilen bulgular, yatırımcı kararları ile likidite azlık primi arasında bir ilişki olmadığı yönündedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

BANK, S., KAHRAMAN, E. (2022). THE EFFECT OF ILLIQUIDITY PREMIUM ON STOCK RETURNS: EVIDENCE FROM BORSA ISTANBUL. Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 38 - Sayı: 3, 465–486. https://ajindex.com/articles/532940

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Acharya, Viral V. ve Pedersen, Lasse Heje (2005), “Asset Pricing with Liquidity Risk”, Journal of Financial Economics, 77(2), 375-410.
  2. Akar, Cüneyt (2015), “Türkiye Hisse Senedi Piyasasında Likidite Ölçülerinin Karşılaştırılması ve Likidite Volatilitesi Hisse Senedi Getiri Arasındaki İlişki”, Yönetim ve Ekonomi, 22(1), 31-48.
  3. Akbaş, Ferhat vd. (2011), The Volatility of Liquidity and Expected Stock Returns, Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi, Texas A&M University. Amihud, Yakov ve Mendelson, Haim (1986), “Asset Pricing and the Bid-Ask Spread”, Journal of Financial Economics, 17(2), 223-249.
  4. Amihud, Yakov (2002), “Illiquidity and Stock Returns: Cross-Section and Time-Series Effects”, Journal of Financial Markets, 5(1), 31-56.
  5. Atılgan, Yiğit vd. (2016), “Liquidity and Equity Returns in Borsa Istanbul”, Applied Economics, 48(52), 5075-5092.
  6. Ben-Rephael, Azi vd. (2015), “The Diminishing Liquidity Premium”, Journal of Financial and Quantitive Analysis, 50(1-2), 197-229.
  7. Brennan, Michael J. ve Subrahmanyam, Avanidhar (1996), “Market Microstructure and Asset Pricing: On the Compensation for Illiquidity in Stock Returns”, Journal of Financial Economics, 49(3), 345-373.
  8. Chan, Howard W. ve Faff, Robert W. (2005), “Asset Pricing and the Illiquidity Premium”, Financial Review, 40(4), 429-458.
  9. Chen, Jiaqi ve Mohammed, Sherif (2016), “Illiquidity Premium and Expected Stock Returns in the UK: A New Approach”, Physica A, 458, 52-66.
  10. Chordia, Tarun vd. (2001), “Trading Activity and Expected Stock Returns”, Journal of Financial Economics, 59(1), 3-32.
  11. Constantinides, George M. (1986), “Capital Market Equilibrium with Transaction Costs”, The Journal of Political Economy, 94(4), 842-862.
  12. Corwin, Shane A. Ve Schultz, Paul (2012), “A Simple Way to Estimate Bid-Ask Spreads from Daily High and Low Prices”, The Journal of Finance, 67(2), 719-760.
  13. Çalgıcı, Seda (2015), Likiditeye Göre Ayarlanmış Finansal Varlık Fiyatlama Modeli ve Borsa İstanbul’da Test Edilmesi, Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, İstanbul Üniversitesi,
  14. Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü. Datar, Vinay T. vd (1998), “Liquidity and Stock Returns: An Alternative Test”, Journal of Financial Markets, 1(2), 203-219.
  15. Eleswarapu, Venkat R. ve Reinganum, Marc R. (1993), “The Seasonal Behavior of the Liquidity Premium in Asset Pricing”, Journal of Financial Economics, 34(3), 373-386.
  16. Emrah, Nermin (2015), Impact of Liquidity on Stock Returns Listed in Borsa Istanbul, Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Bilkent Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Ünive