SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 38 - Sayı: 1

DETERMINING THE CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK OF THE FACTORS CONSTITUTING ENTREPRENEURSHIP ECOSYSTEMS BY BIBLIOMETRIC ANALYSIS

GİRİŞİMCİLİK EKOSİSTEMLERİNİ MEYDANA GETİREN FAKTÖRLERE AİT KAVRAMSAL ÇERÇEVENİN BİBLİYOMETRiK ANALİZ İLE TESPİTİ

Hakan DUMAN
Serkan KÜNÜ
Pages
33–57
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The literature sources examined in this study point to the fact that SMEs and self-employed and innovative and ambitious entrepreneurs need to be separated from each other in order to create and develop an entrepreneurship ecosystem.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Increases in employment are welcomed by all segments of society, especially policy-makers, and are engaged in various efforts to support entrepreneurship as a remedy for unemployment.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this study, 154 journal articles published in English in the basic collection of Web of Science were examined with bibliometric methods and a conceptual framework was formed on the entrepreneurial ecosystem and its components through the most effective articles.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The literature sources examined in this study point to the fact that SMEs and self-employed and innovative and ambitious entrepreneurs need to be separated from each other in order to create and develop an entrepreneurship ecosystem.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Girişimcilik · girişimcilik ekosistemi · inovasyon

Abstract

Increases in employment are welcomed by all segments of society, especially policy-makers, and are engaged in various efforts to support entrepreneurship as a remedy for unemployment. One of the new approaches to promoting entrepreneurship in a region is the entrepreneurial ecosystem approach. In this study, 154 journal articles published in English in the basic collection of Web of Science were examined with bibliometric methods and a conceptual framework was formed on the entrepreneurial ecosystem and its components through the most effective articles. The literature sources examined in this study point to the fact that SMEs and self-employed and innovative and ambitious entrepreneurs need to be separated from each other in order to create and develop an entrepreneurship ecosystem.

Özet

İstihdamdaki artışlar, başta politika yapıcılar olmak üzere, toplumun her kesimi tarafından memnuniyetle karşılanmakta ve işsizliğe bir çare olarak girişimciliğin desteklenmesi amacıyla çeşitli çabalar içerisine girilmektedirler. Bir bölgede girişimciliğin desteklenmesi ile ilgili yeni yaklaşımlardan bir tanesi de “girişimcilik ekosistemi” yaklaşımıdır. Bu çalışmada Web of Science temel koleksiyonunda bulunan, İngilizce yayınlanmış 154 dergi makalesi, bibliyometrik yöntemle incelenmiş ve en etkili bulunan makaleler üzerinden girişimcilik ekosistemi ve bileşenleri üzerinde sentez bir kavramsal çerçeve oluşturulmuştur. Bu çalışmada incelenen literatür kaynakları, bir girişimcilik ekosistemi yaratmak ve geliştirmek için öncelikle KOBI ve serbest meslek sahipleri ile inovatif ve hırslı girişimcilerin birbirlerinden ayrılması gerektiğine, politikalarda elitist bir ayrımcılık uygulanarak hırslı ve yenilikçi girişimcilere ağırlık verilmesine işaret etmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

DUMAN, H., KÜNÜ, S. (2022). DETERMINING THE CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK OF THE FACTORS CONSTITUTING ENTREPRENEURSHIP ECOSYSTEMS BY BIBLIOMETRIC ANALYSIS. Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 38 - Sayı: 1, 33–57. https://ajindex.com/articles/532913

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Acs, Z. J., Autio, E., Szerb, L. (2014), “National systems of entrepreneurship: Measurement issues and policy implications”, Research Policy, 43(3), 476-494.
  2. Al, U., Tonta, Y. (2004), “Atıf analizi: Hacettepe Üniversitesi Kütüphanecilik Bölümü tezlerinde atıf yapılan kaynaklar”, Bilgi Dünyası, 5(1), 19-47.
  3. Aria, M., Cuccurullo, C. (2017), “Bibliometrix: An r-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis”, Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959-975.
  4. Audretsch, D. B., Belitski, M. (2017), “Entrepreneurial ecosystems in cities: Establishing the framework conditions”, The Journal of Technology Transfer, 42(5), 1030-1051.
  5. Aulet, B., Murray, F. (2013), A tale of two entrepreneurs: Understanding differences in the types of entrepreneurship in the economy (Report), Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation. Autio, E., Kenney, M., Mustar, P., Siegel, D., Wright, M. (2014), “Entrepreneurial innovation: The importance of context”, Research Policy, 43(7), 1097-1108.
  6. Bahrami, H., Evans: (1995), “Flexible re-cycling and high-technology entrepreneurship”, California Management Review, 37(3), 62-89.
  7. Bischoff, K., Volkmann, C. K., Audretsch, D. B. (2018), “Stakeholder collaboration in entrepreneurship education: An analysis of the entrepreneurial ecosystems of european higher educational institutions”, Journal Of Technology Transfer, 43(1), 20-46.
  8. Boutillier, S., Carré, D., Levratto, N. (2016), Entrepreneurial ecosystems, e-book: Wiley-ISTE. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edsebk&AN=1202063&lang=tr&site=eds-live&authtype=ip,uid (15/10/2017)
  9. Carayannis, E. G., Provance, M., Grigoroudis, E. (2016), “Entrepreneurship ecosystems: an agent-based simulation approach”, JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER, 41(3), 631-653.
  10. Cohen, B. (2006), “Sustainable valley entrepreneurial ecosystems”, Business Strategy and the Environment, 15(1), 1-14.
  11. Feld, B. (2012), Startup communities: Building an entrepreneurial ecosystem in your city, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons. Feldman, M., Lowe, N. (2015), “Triangulating regional economies: Realizing the promise of digital data”, Research Policy, 44(9, SI), 1785-1793
  12. Feldman, M. P. (2014), “The character of innovative places: Entrepreneurial strategy, economic development, and prosperity”, Small Business Economics, 43(1), 9-20.
  13. Foster, G., Shimizu, C., Ciesinski, S., Davila, A., Hassan: Z., Jia, N., Morris, R. (2013), Entrepreneurial ecosystems around the globe and company growth dynamics: Report summary for the annual meeting of the new cham