Journals / Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 39 - Sayı: 3

The Relationship Between International Equity Investments and Trade in The Framework of The Risk Hedging Approach

Riskten Korunma Yaklaşımı Çerçevesinde Uluslararası Hisse Senedi Yatırımları ile Ticaret Arasındaki İlişki

Pages
475–489
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Therefore, bilateral export across countries has risk hedging effect on bilateral equity investment.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of the study is to analyze the risk hedging effect of bilateral trade on bilateral equity investment.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The analysis is realized with the financial gravity model for 2001-2018 years.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Therefore, bilateral export across countries has risk hedging effect on bilateral equity investment.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:2001-2018 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The aim of the study is to analyze the risk hedging effect of bilateral trade on bilateral equity investment. The analysis is realized with the financial gravity model for 2001-2018 years. Bilateral equity invetment and bilateral export variables of 65 countries and traditional gravity variables are used in the model. The model is estimated with Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) and Poisson-Pseudo Maximum Likelihood (PPML) estimators in the first stage. Two-Stage Least Squares (2SLS) estimator with Instrumental Variables method is used to control the endogeneity problem between export and bilateral equity investment in the second stage. According to the model results, the increasing export between source and destination country decreases the equity risk for foreign investors and raises bilateral equity investment between them. Therefore, bilateral export across countries has risk hedging effect on bilateral equity investment.

Özet

Çalışmanın amacı ülkeler arasındaki ikili mal ticaretinin ikili hisse senedi yatırımları üzerindeki riskten korunma etkisini analizetmektir. Analiz, finansal çekim modeli ile 2001-2018 yılları için gerçekleştirilmiştir. Modelde 65 ülkenin ikili hisse senedi yatırımları,ikili ihracat ve geleneksel çekim değişkenleri kullanılmıştır. Model ilk aşamada En Küçük Kareler (EKK) ve Poisson-Pseudo En ÇokOlabilirlik (PPML) tahmincileri ile tahminlenmiştir. İkinci aşamada ise ihracat ve ikili hisse senedi yatırımları arasındaki içsellikprobleminin kontrolü için Araç değişkenler yöntemi ile İki Aşamalı EKK (2AEKK) tahmincisi kullanılmıştır. Model sonuçlarına göre,kaynak ve destinasyon ülke arasındaki artan ihracat, yabancı yatırımcı için hisse senedinin riskini azaltmakta ve ikili hisse senediyatırımını artırmaktadır. Dolayısıyla, ülkeler arasındaki ihracat ikili hisse senedi yatırımı üzerinde riskten korunma etkisine sahiptir.

🔖

Cite This Article

USTALAR, S. A. (2022). The Relationship Between International Equity Investments and Trade in The Framework of The Risk Hedging Approach. Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 39 - Sayı: 3, 475–489. https://ajindex.com/articles/532869

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Aggarwal, R., C. Kearney, B. Lucey (2012), “Gravity and Culture in Foreign Portfolio Investment”, Journal of Banking and Finance, 2(36), 525–538.
  2. Anderson, J. E., E. van Wincoop (2003), “Gravity with Gravitas: A Solution to the Border Puzzle”, The American Economic Review, 93(1), 170-192.
  3. Aviat, A., N. Coeurdacier (2007), “The Geography of Trade in Goods and Asset Holdings”, Journal of International Economics, 71(1), 22-51.
  4. Bulow, J., K. Rogoff (1989), “Sovereign Debt: Is to Forgive to Forget?”, American Economic Review, 1(79), 43-50.
  5. Chitu, L. B. Eichengreen, A. J. Mehl (2013), “History, Gravity and International Finance”, Journal of International Money and Finance, 46, 104-129.
  6. Coeurdacier N. (2009), “Do Trade Costs in Goods Market Lead to Home Bias in Equities?”,Journal of International Economics, 1(77), 86-100.
  7. Coeurdacier N., P. Martin (2009), “The Geography of Asset Trade and The Euro: Insiders and Outsiders”, Journal of The Japanese and International Economies, 23(2), 90–113.
  8. Daude, C., M. Fratzscher (2008), “The Pecking Order of Cross-Border Investment”, Journal of International Economics, 74(1), 94-119.
  9. De Santis, R. A. (2010), “The Geography of International Portfolio Flows, International CAPM, and TheRole of Monetary Policy Frameworks”, SSRN Electronic Journal, 6(2), 147-197.
  10. Galtsyan, V., P. R. Lane (2013), “Bilateral Portfolio Dynamics During The Global Financial Crisis”, European Economic Review, 57, 63–74.
  11. Galtsyan, V., P. R. Lane, C. Mehigan, R. Mercado (2016), “The Holders and Issuers of International Portfolio Securities”, Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, 42, 100-108.
  12. Grinblatt, M., M. Keloharju (2001), “How Distance, Language, and Culture Influence Stock Holdings and Trades”, The Journal of Finance, 56(3), 1053-1073.
  13. Hellmanzik, C., M. Schmitz (2017), “Taking Gravity Online: The Role of Virtual Proximity in International Finance”,Journal of International Money and Finance,77, 164-179.
  14. Karolyi, G. A. (2016), “The Gravity of Culture for Finance”, Journal of Corporate Finance, 41(C), 610-625.
  15. Kpodar, K., P. Imam (2016), “Does a Regional Trade Agreement Lessen or Worsen Growth Volatility? An Empirical Investigation: RTAs and Growth Volatility”, Review of International Economics, 24(5). Krugman, P., M. Obstfeld, M. Melitz (2012), International Economics: Theory and Policy, United States of America: Pearson Education, Inc. Lane, P. R., G. M. Mılesi-Feretti (2008), “International Investment Patterns”, The Review of Economics