SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 39 - Sayı: 4

CONCEPTS, INSTITUTIONS AND POLICIES IN THE KNOWLEDGE ECONOMY: A GAME THEORETIC APPROACH

BİLGİ EKONOMİSİNDE KAVRAMLAR, KURUMLAR VE POLİTİKALAR: OYUN TEORİSİ TEMELLİ BİR YAKLAŞIM

Erkan GÜRPINAR
Pages
663–676
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The article shows that these developments have important effects on both knowledge workers and new modes of production, and argue that increase in the importance of knowledge workers is directly related to the institutional environment.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This article examines the relationship between actors and institutions in the knowledge economy using game theory.
📊
Key Findings & Data:By this way, both coordination and conflict between universities, firms, individual entrepreneurs, knowledge workers and scientists that form the knowledge economy, and cooperation regarding new forms of knowledge production are analyzed.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The article shows that these developments have important effects on both knowledge workers and new modes of production, and argue that increase in the importance of knowledge workers is directly related to the institutional environment.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:veri · bilgi · örtük bilgi

Abstract

This article examines the relationship between actors and institutions in the knowledge economy using game theory. By this way, both coordination and conflict between universities, firms, individual entrepreneurs, knowledge workers and scientists that form the knowledge economy, and cooperation regarding new forms of knowledge production are analyzed. Today, discussions regarding the knowledge economy include large-scale codification of information, and technologies based on intellectual property rights (big data, AI, internet of things etc.). In this context, the difference between data and information and the effects of this demarcation on the organization of production are crucial for understanding new forms of production. The article shows that these developments have important effects on both knowledge workers and new modes of production, and argue that increase in the importance of knowledge workers is directly related to the institutional environment.

Özet

Bu makalede bilgi ekonomisini oluşturan aktörler ve kurumlar arasındaki ilişkiler oyun teorisi kullanılarak incelenmektedir. Böylelikle hem bilgi ekonomisini oluşturan üniversiteler, firmalar, bireysel girişimciler, bilgi işçileri ve bilim insanları arasındaki koordinasyon ve çıkar çatışmaları analiz edilmekte hem de yeni bilgi üretimi biçimlerine ilişkin eşgüdüm ve iş birliği sorunları incelenmektedir. Günümüzde, bilgi ekonomisine ilişkin tartışmalar bilginin büyük ölçekli kodifikasyonu ve fikri mülkiyetine dayalı teknolojileri (büyük veri, YZ, nesnelerin interneti vb.) içermektedir. Bu bağlamda veri-bilgi arasındaki fark ve bu farkın üretim organizasyonu üzerindeki etkileri yeni üretim biçimlerinin anlaşılması için önemlidir. Makale, bu gelişmelerin hem bilgi işçileri hem de yeni üretim biçimleri açısından önemli etkileri olacağını ve bilgi işçilerinin öneminin artmasının kurumsal yapı ile doğrudan ilişkili olduğunu göstermektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

GÜRPINAR, E. (2022). CONCEPTS, INSTITUTIONS AND POLICIES IN THE KNOWLEDGE ECONOMY: A GAME THEORETIC APPROACH. Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 39 - Sayı: 4, 663–676. https://ajindex.com/articles/532860

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (23)

  1. Akçomak, S., E. Erdil, T. Pamukçu (2016),
  2. Bilim, Teknoloji ve Yenilik, İstanbul: İstanbul Bilgi Üniversitesi Yayınları.
  3. Alchian, A., H. Demsetz (1972), “Production, Information Costs, and Economic Organization”, American Economic Review, 62(5), 777-795.
  4. Antonelli, C. (2005), “Models of Knowledge and Systems of Governance”, Journal of Institutional Economics, 1(1), 51-73.
  5. Arrow, K. (1962), “Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention”, in NBER The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity: Economic and Social Factors, 609-626.
  6. Reprinted in Lamberton, D. M. (ed.) (1971) The Economics of Information and Knowledge, Harmondsworth: Penguin, 141-159.
  7. Benkler, Y. (2002), “Coase’s Penguin, or, Linux and the Nature of the Firm”, Yale Law Journal, 112, 3. Benkler, Y. (2006),
  8. The Wealth of Networks, New Haven: Yale University Press.
  9. Boldrin, M., D. Levine (2008), Against Intellectual Monopoly, http://www.dklevine.com/general/intellectual/against.htm
  10. Bowles, S. (2006),
  11. Microeconomics, New York: Russell Sage Foundation. Braverman, H. (1974),
  12. Labor and Monopoly Capital, New York: Monthly Review Press.
  13. Chang, H-J. (2001), “Intellectual Property Rights and Economic Development: Historical Lessons and Emerging Issues”, Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 2(2), 287-309.
  14. Chang, H-J. (2002)
  15. Kicking Away the Ladder, London: Anthem. Coase, R. (1937), “The Nature of the Firm”, Economics, 4(16), 386-405.
  16. Coriat, B., F. Orsi (2002), “Establishing a New Intellectual Property Rights Regime in the United State: Origins, Content and Problem”, Research Policy, 31, 1491-1507.
  17. Coriat, B., O. Weinstein (2011), “Patent Regimes and the Commodification of Knowledge”, LEM Working Paper Series, 2011/17. Cowan, R., P. David, D. Foray (2000), “The Explicit Economics of Knowledge Codification and Tacitness”, Industrial and Corporate Change, 9(2), 211-253.
  18. Dasgupta, P., P. David (1994), “Toward a New Economics of Science”, Research Policy, 23(5), 487-521.
  19. David, P. (1993), “Intellectual Property Institutions and the Panda's Thumb: Patents, Copyrights, and Trade Secrets in Economic Theory and History”, in Global Dimension of Intellectual Property Rights in Science and Technology. Demsetz, H. (1967), “Toward a Theory of Property Rights”, American Economic Review, 57(2), 347-359.
  20. Demsetz, H. (1969), “Information and Efficiency: Another Viewpoint”, Journal of Law and Economics, 12, 1-22.
  21. Edquist, C. (1997),
  22. Systems of innovation, Linda: Pinter Publishers.
  23. Elkin-Koren N., E.