SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi / 2022 / Cilt: 40 - Sayı: 2

THE ROLE OF TOXIC LEADERSHIP IN THE EFFECT OF SOCIAL LOAFING ON GOSSIPING

SOSYAL KAYTARMANIN DEDİKODUYA ETKİSİNDE TOKSİK LİDERLİĞİN ROLÜ

İnan KAYNAK
Berat ÇİÇEK
Pages
288–315
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to the results, it was concluded that social loafing positively affects gossiping and toxic leadership behavior, besides it was seen that toxic leadership affects gossiping positively.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, the variables such as social loafing, gossiping and toxic leadership, which could have serious consequences for organizations, are discussed and their interactions with each other are examined.
📊
Key Findings & Data:For this purpose, a survey was conducted with 191 people and the data obtained were analyzed by adopting partial least squares based structural equation modeling.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to the results, it was concluded that social loafing positively affects gossiping and toxic leadership behavior, besides it was seen that toxic leadership affects gossiping positively.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Sosyal Kaytarma · Toksik Liderlik · İşyeri Dedikodusu

Abstract

In this study, the variables such as social loafing, gossiping and toxic leadership, which could have serious consequences for organizations, are discussed and their interactions with each other are examined. For this purpose, a survey was conducted with 191 people and the data obtained were analyzed by adopting partial least squares based structural equation modeling. According to the results, it was concluded that social loafing positively affects gossiping and toxic leadership behavior, besides it was seen that toxic leadership affects gossiping positively. In addition, another result of the study reveals that toxic leadership mediates the relationship between social loafing and gossiping. Finally, it was concluded that tenure moderates the relationship between social loafing and gossiping.

Özet

Bu çalışmada örgütler için ciddi sonuçları olan sosyal kaytarma, dedikodu ve toksik liderlik kavramları ele alınmış ve birbiri ile olan etkileşimleri incelenmiştir. Çalışma kapsamında 191 kişi ile anket çalışması yapılarak sonuçlar kısmi en küçük kareler (Partial Least Squares-PLS) temelli yapısal eşitlik modellemesi yoluyla analize tabi tutulmuştur. Analiz sonuçlarına göre, sosyal kaytarmanın dedikoduyu ve toksik liderlik davranışını pozitif yönde etkilediği ve toksik liderliğinde dedikoduyu pozitif yönde etkilediği sonuçlarına ulaşılmıştır. Ayrıca, toksik liderliğin sosyal kaytarma ile dedikodu arasındaki ilişkide tam aracılık rolü tespit edilen diğer bir sonuçtur. Son olarak çalışma süresinin sosyal kaytarma ile dedikodu arasındaki ilişkiyi düzenlediği sonucuna ulaşılmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

KAYNAK, İ., ÇİÇEK, B. (2022). THE ROLE OF TOXIC LEADERSHIP IN THE EFFECT OF SOCIAL LOAFING ON GOSSIPING. Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 40 - Sayı: 2, 288–315. https://ajindex.com/articles/532840

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Aboramadan, M., Turkmenoglu, M. A., Dahleez, K. A., & Cicek, B. (2021). Narcissistic leadership and behavioral cynicism in the hotel industry: The role of employee silence and negative workplace gossiping. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 33(2), 428-447.
  2. Agarwal, S., Decarlo, T. E., & Vyas, S. B. (1999). Leadership behavior and organizational commitment: A comparative study of american and indian salespersons. Journal Of International Business Studies, 30(4), 727-743.
  3. Akca, İ., & Tuzcuoğlu, F. (2020). A model proposal for the impact of toxic leadership on the counterproductive work behaviours and intention to leave. Journal of Life Economics, 7(3), 257-268.
  4. Akgündüz, Y., & Eryılmaz, G. (2018). Does turnover intention mediate the effects of job insecurity and co-worker support on social loafing? International Journal of Hospitality Management, 68, 41-49.
  5. Akduru, H. E. & Semerciöz, F. (2017). Kamu kurumlarında örgütsel dedikodu ve işyeri yalnızlığına dair bir araştırma. Uluslararası Yönetim İktisat ve İşletme Dergisi, ICMEB17 Özel Sayısı, 106-119.
  6. Alnuaimi, O. A., Robert, L. P., & Maruping, L. M. (2010). Team size, dispersion, and social loafing in technology-supported teams: A perspective on the theory of moral disengagement. Journal Of Management Information Systems, 27(1), 203-230.
  7. Appelbaum, S.H., & Girard D.R. (2007). Toxins in The Workplace: Affect on Organizations and Employees. Emerald Group Publishing Limited. Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411-423.
  8. Appelbaum, S. H., Iaconi, G. D., & Matousek, A. (2007). Positive and negative deviant workplace behaviors: Causes, impacts, and solutions. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 7(5), 586-598.
  9. Arar, T., Arar, E. S., & Öneren, M. (2020). Daha iyi bir iş yaşamı: Örgütsel toksisite faktörlerinin ahp ile belirlenmesi. Yönetim Bilimleri Dergisi, 18(35), 57-76.
  10. Arabacı, İ. B., Sünkür, M., & Şimşek, F. Z. (2012). Öğretmenlerin dedikodu ve söylenti mekanizmasına ilişkin görüşleri: Nitel bir çalışma. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi, 2(2), 171-190.
  11. Ashforth, B., & Humphrey, R. H. (1995). Emotion in the workplace: A reappraisal. Human Relations, 48(2), 97-125. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872679504800201
  12. Aquino, K., & Thau, S. (2009). Workplace victimization: Aggression from the target’s perspective. Annual Review of Psycholo