Journals / Hacettepe Üniversitesi Hemşirelik Fakültesi Dergisi / 2017 / Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 1

Randomized Controlled Trials

Randomize Kontrollü Deneyler

Pages
73–92
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This review includes the mistakes made in these stages and the precaution to be taken.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This review aims to explain the basic concepts and approaches related to randomized controlled trials, which is an important type of research with the development of viewpoint of evidence -based care.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The success and quality of randomized controlled trials hinge upon observing the actual effect of the applied intervention on the emergence of the measured result.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This review includes the mistakes made in these stages and the precaution to be taken.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Dış geçerlik · iç geçerlik · nedensellik

Abstract

This review aims to explain the basic concepts and approaches related to randomized controlled trials, which is an important type of research with the development of viewpoint of evidence -based care. The success and quality of randomized controlled trials hinge upon observing the actual effect of the applied intervention on the emergence of the measured result. Establishing this cause-effect relation can be possible if randomized controlled trials are conducted within a protocol, use random assignment, avoid biase, ensure internal and external validity, use blind techniques and appropriate statistical evaluations. This review includes the mistakes made in these stages and the precaution to be taken.

Özet

Bu derleme kanıta dayalı uygulama bakış açısının gelişmesiyle birlikte önemli bir araştırma türü haline gelen Randomize Kontrollü Deneylerle ilgili temel kavram ve yaklaşımların açıklanması amacıyla yapılmıştır. Randomize Kontrollü Deneylerin başarısı ve kalitesi ölçülen sonucun ortaya çıkmasında uygulanan müdahalenin gerçek etkisinin gösterilmesine bağlıdır. Bu neden-sonuç bağlantısının kurulması Randomize Kontrollü Deneylerin bir protokol çerçevesinde yürütülmesi, random atamanın yapılması, yanlılıkların önlenmesi, iç ve dış geçerliliğin sağlanması, körleme tekniklerinin kullanılması ve uygun istatistiksel değerlendirmenin yapılmasıyla olasıdır. Bu derleme bu aşamalara ilişkin yapılan hataları ve alınabilecek önlemlere ilişkin yaklaşımları içermektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

AKIN, B., KOÇOĞLU, D. (2022). Randomized Controlled Trials. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Hemşirelik Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 1, 73–92. https://ajindex.com/articles/532782

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. Ciliska D, Cand N, Brian H. Evidence-based nursing, USA: Wiley; 2013. p.15-48 2. Persson J, Sahlin NE. A philosophical account of interventions and causal representation in nursing research. International Journal Of Nursing Studies 2009; 46(4): 547-56. 3. Cochrane Consumer Network. Levels of evidence. 2016. URL:http://consumers.cochrane.org/levelsevidence: 10.12.2016 4. Shah HM, Chung KC. Archie Cochrane and his vision for evidence-based medicine. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009; 124(3): 982–8. 5. Johnson MH. The early history of evidence-based reproductive medicine.Reprod Biomed Online 2013;26(3):201-9. 6. Peterson MH, Barnason S, Donnelly B, Hıll K, Mıley H, Rıggs L Whiteman K. Choosing the best evidence to guide clinical practice: Application of AACN levels of evidence. Critical Care Nurse 2014; 34(2):58-68. 7. Nichol AD, Bailey M, Cooper DJ. Challenging issues in randomised controlled trials. Injury 2010;41: 20–3 8. Higgins JPT, Green S. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 5.1.0. England: The Cochrane Collaboration; 2011. 9. Flecha OD, Douglas de Oliveira DW, Marques LS, Gonçalves PF. A commentary on randomized clinical trials: How to produce them with a good level of evidence. Perspect Clin Res 2016;7:75-80. 10. Forbes A. Clinical intervention research in nursing. International Journal of Nursing Studies 2009; 46: 557–68 11. Richards DA, Hamers JP. RCTs in complex nursing interventions and laboratory experimental studies. International Journal of Nursing Studies 2009;(46): 588–92 12. Borglin G, Richards DA. Bias in experimental nursing research: Strategies to improve the qualityand explanatory power of nursing science. International Journal of Nursing Studies 2010;47:123–8 13. Fridlund B, Jönsson AC, Andersson EK, Bala SV, Dahlman GB, Forsberg, A, et al. Essentials of nursing care in randomized controlled trials of nurse-led interventionsin somatic care: A Systematic Review. Open Journal of Nursing 2014; 4: 181-97. 14. Mantzoukas S. The research evidence published in high impact nursing journals between 2000 and 2006: A quantitative content analysis. International Journal of Nursing Studies. 2009;46; 479–89 15. Baldi I, Del Lago E, De Bardi S, Sartor G, Soriani,N, Zanotti, R. Trends in RCT nursing research over 20 years: mind the gap British Journal of Nursing 2014;23(16), 895-99. 16. Blackwood B. Methodological issues in evaluating complex healthcare interventions Journal of Advanced Nursing 2006; 54(5): 612–2. 17. Thompson