SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Hacettepe Journal of Mathematics and Statistics / 2009 / Cilt: 38 - Sayı: 2

Strong Versions of the Theorems of Weierstrass, Montel and Hurwitz

STRONG VERSIONS OF THE THEOREMS OF WEIERSTRASS, MONTEL AND HURWITZ

Oktay DUMAN
Pages
153–159
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

So, we obtain more powerful results than the classical ones in complex analysis.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this article, using the notion of statistical convergence, we relax the hypotheses of the well-known theorems from classical complex analysis, such as Weierstrass’ Theorem, Montel’s Theorem and Hurwitz’s Theorem.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this article, using the notion of statistical convergence, we relax the hypotheses of the well-known theorems from classical complex analysis, such as Weierstrass’ Theorem, Montel’s Theorem and Hurwitz’s Theorem.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:So, we obtain more powerful results than the classical ones in complex analysis.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Statistical convergence · Weierstrass’ theorem · Montel’s theorem

Abstract

In this article, using the notion of statistical convergence, we relax the hypotheses of the well-known theorems from classical complex analysis, such as Weierstrass’ Theorem, Montel’s Theorem and Hurwitz’s Theorem. So, we obtain more powerful results than the classical ones in complex analysis.

🔖

Cite This Article

DUMAN, O. (2022). Strong Versions of the Theorems of Weierstrass, Montel and Hurwitz. Hacettepe Journal of Mathematics and Statistics, Cilt: 38 - Sayı: 2, 153–159. https://ajindex.com/articles/530688

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Connor, J. S. The statistical and p-Ces´aro convergence of sequences, Analysis 8, 47–63,
  2. Demirci, K. A criterion for A-statistical convergence, Indian J. Pure Appl. Math. 29, 559–, 1998.
  3. Fast, H. Sur la convergence statistique, Colloq. Math. 2, 241–244, 1951.
  4. Freedman, A. R. and Sember, J. J. Densities and summability, Pacific J. Math. 95, 293–305,
  5. Fridy, J. A. On statistical convergence, Analysis 5, 301–313, 1985.
  6. Fridy, J. A. Statistical limit points, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 118, 1187–1192, 1993.
  7. Fridy, J. A. and Orhan, C. Statistical limit superior and limit inferior, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 125, 3625–3631, 1997.
  8. Hardy, G. H. Divergent Series (Oxford Univ. Press, London, 1949).
  9. Kolk, E. Matrix summability of statistically convergent sequences, Analysis 13, 77–83, 1993.
  10. Miller, H. I. A measure theoretical subsequence characterization of statistical convergence, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 347, 1811–1819, 1995.
  11. Mursaleen, M. and Edely, Osama H. H. Generalized statistical convergence, Inform. Sci. 162, –294, 2004.
  12. Narasimhan, R. Complex Analysis in One Variable (Birkh¨auser, Boston, 1985). Sava¸s, E. On strong almost A-summability with respect to a modulus and statistical conver- gence, Indian J. Pure Appl. Math. 23, 217–222, 1992.