Journals / Hacettepe Journal of Mathematics and Statistics / 2010 / Cilt: 39 - Sayı: 1

An Alternative Agreement Statistics with Linear Weight between Ordinal Categorical Measurements

Pages
97–107
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
🔖

Cite This Article

SEMİZ, M., OCAK, B. (2022). An Alternative Agreement Statistics with Linear Weight between Ordinal Categorical Measurements. Hacettepe Journal of Mathematics and Statistics, Cilt: 39 - Sayı: 1, 97–107. https://ajindex.com/articles/530670

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Agresti, A. Categorical Data Analysis (John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, 1990).
  2. Bland, J. M. and Altman, D. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two meth- ods of clinical measurement, Lancet 8, 307–310, 1986.
  3. Brennan, R. L. and Prediger, D. J. Coefficient kappa: Some uses, misuses and alternatives, Educational and Psychological Measurement 41, 687–699, 1981.
  4. Cicchetti, D. V. and Allison, T. A new procedure for assessing reliability of scoring EEG sleep recordings, American Journal of EEG Technology 11, 101–109, 1971.
  5. Cohen, J. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales, Educational and Psychological Measurement 20, 37–46, 1960.
  6. Cohen, J. Weighted kappa: Nominal scale agreement with provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit, Psychological Bulletin 70, 213–220, 1968.
  7. Dunn, G. (1989). Design and Analysis of Reliability Studies: The Statistical Evaluation of Measurements Errors(Edward Arnold, London, 1989).
  8. Fay, M. P. Measuring agreement between two statistics with applications to age standard- ization, J. R. Statist. Soc. A 169 (1), 81–96, 2006.
  9. Fleiss, J. L. and Cohen, J. The equivalance of weighted kappa and the intraclass correlation coefficient as measures of reliability, Educational and Psychological Measurement 33, 613– 619, 1973. G¨ung¨or, K., Erten, H., Akarslan, Z. Z., C¸ elik, I. and Semiz, M. Approximal carious lesion depth assessment with Insight and Ultraspeed films, Operative Dentistry 30 (1), 58–62, 2005.
  10. Janson, H. and Olsson, U. A measure of agreement for interval or nominal multivariate observations by different sets of judges, Educational and Psychological Measurement 64 (1), 62–70, 2004.
  11. Landis, J. R. and Koch G. G. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data, Biometrics 33, 159–174, 1977.
  12. Lin, L., Hedayat, A. S., Sinha, B. and Yang, M. Statistical methods in assessing agreement: Models, issues, and tools, Journal of the American Statistical Association 97 (457), 257–270, 2002.
  13. Lin, L. I-K. Total deviation index for measuring individual agreement with applications in laboratory performance and bioequivalence, Statistics in Medicine 19, 255–270, 2000.
  14. Maclura, M. and Willet, W. C. Misinterpretation and misuse of kappa statistics, American Journal of Epidemiology 126, 161–169, 1987.
  15. Perreault, W. D. and Leigh, L. E. Reliability of nominal data based on qualitative judgments, Journal of Marketing Research XXVI, 135–148, 1989.
  16. Sim, J. and Wright, C. C. The Kappa statistics in reliability studies: U