To conclude, (∈ , ∈∨q)-fuzzy indistinguishability relations are defined and some of their properties are studied.
📌 3 Key Takeaways
🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this paper (∈ , ∈∨q)-fuzzy equivalence relations are defined and some of their properties are studied.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The partition of an (∈ , ∈∨q)-fuzzy equivalence relation is studied.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:To conclude, (∈ , ∈∨q)-fuzzy indistinguishability relations are defined and some of their properties are studied.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters
Abstract
In this paper (∈ , ∈∨q)-fuzzy equivalence relations are defined and some of their properties are studied. The partition of an (∈ , ∈∨q)-fuzzy equivalence relation is studied. It is shown that under a semibal- anced mapping the preimage of an (∈ , ∈∨q)-fuzzy equivalence rela- tion is an (∈ , ∈∨q)-fuzzy equivalence relation, whereas the image of an (∈ , ∈∨q)-fuzzy equivalence relation under a balanced mapping is an (∈, ∈∨q)-fuzzy equivalence relation. To conclude, (∈ , ∈∨q)-fuzzy indistinguishability relations are defined and some of their properties are studied.
🔖
Cite This Article
ALİ, M. İ., SHABIR, M., FENG, F. (2022). A note on (∈, ∈∨q)-fuzzy equivalence relations and indistinguishability operators. Hacettepe Journal of Mathematics and Statistics, Cilt: 40 - Sayı: 3, 383–400. https://ajindex.com/articles/530618
Beg, I. and Ashraf, S. Fuzzy dissimilarity and distance function, Fuzzy Inf. Eng. 2, 205-217, 2009. [2]Beg, I. and Ashraf, S. Fuzzy equivalence relations, Kuwait J. Sci. and Eng. 35 (1A), 191-206, 2008. [3]Behounek, L. Extenionality in graded properties of fuzzy relations, Proc. IPMU Eleventh 10th Int. Conf. Vol II, 1604-1611», 2006. [4]Behounek, L., Bodenhofer, U. and.Cintula, P. Relations in fuzzy class theory: Initial steps, Fuzzy.Sets and Systems 159, 1729-1772, 2008. [5]Bhakat, S.K. (∈, ∈∨q)-fuzzy normal, quasinormat and maximal subgroups, Fuzzy Sets and Systems 112, 299-312, 2000. [6]Bhakat, S.K. (∈, ∈∨q)-level subsets, Fuzzy Sets and Systems 103, 529-533, 1999. [7]Bhakat, S.K. and Das, P. (∈, ∈∨q)-fuzzy subgroups, Fuzzy Sets and Systems 80, 359-368, 1996. [8]Bhakat, S.K. and Das, P. Fuzzy subrings and ideals redefined, Fuzzy Sets and Systems 81, 383-393, 1996. [9]Boixader, D. and Recasens, J. Approximate fuzzy preorder and equivalences, Fuzzy IEEE Korea, 20-24, 2009. [10]Chakraborty, M. and Das, S. On fuzzy equivalence 1, Fuzzy Sets and Systems 11, 185-193, 1983. [11]Chakraborty, M. and Das, S. On fuzzy equivalence 2, Fuzzy Sets and Systems 12, 299-307, 1983. [12]Davvaz, B. (∈, ∈∨q)-fuzzy subnearrings and ideals, Soft Comput. 10, 206-211, 2006. [13]Demirci, M. and Recasens, J. Fuzzy groups, fuzzy functions and fuzzy equivalence relations, Fuzzy Sets and Systems 144, 441-458, 2004. [14]Dudek, W. A., Shabir, M. and Ali, M.I. (a,B)-fuzzy ideals of hemirings, Computers and Mathematics with Applications 58, 310-321, 2009. [15]Gottwald, S. Fuzzified fuzzy relation, Proc. 4th IFSA Conf. Vol. Mathematics, Brussels, 82-86, 1991. [16]Gupta, K. C. and Gupta, R. K. Fuzzy equivalence relation redefined, Fuzzy Sets and Systems 79, 227-233, 1996. [17]Gupta, K. C. and Singh, T. P. Fuzzy G-equivalences and G-congruences on a groupoid under semibalanced maps, Fuzzy Sets and Systems 108, 111-116, 1999. [18]Jun, Y. B. and Song, S. Z. Generalized fuzzy interior ideals in semigroups, Information Sciences 176, 3079-3093, 2006. [19]Jacas, J. and Recasens, J. Fuzzified properties of fuzzy relations, Proc. IPMU 10th Int. Conf. 157-161, 2002. [20]Kazanci, O. and Yamak, S. Generalized fuzzy bi-ideals of semigroups, Soft computing 12, 1119-1124, 2008. [21]Kim, K. H. On fuzzy points in semigroups, Inter. J. Math, and Math. Sci. 26(11), 707-712, 2001. [22]Kim, Y. H. and Kim, K. H. The semigroups of fuzzy points, The J. of Fuzzy Mathematics 12, 561-572, 2004. [23]Kuroki, N.