Journals / Hacettepe Journal of Mathematics and Statistics / 2019 / Cilt: 48 - Sayı: 1

Two-stage network DEA with convex hull in intermediate products

Pages
312–331
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The main contributions of this paper are fourfold: (1) we propose models for evaluating the overall efficiency measure of decision making units (DMUs) in a two-stage network structure based on the convex hull in intermediate products; (2) we propose a procedure to determine the target unit of each inefficient DMU; (3) we explain how to calculate the divisional efficiency; (4) we demonstrate the feasibility and richness of the obtained solutions in the context of two examples.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In recent Data envelopment analysis (DEA) literature, many researchers have examined systems with a two-stage network structure and its pitfalls.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In these studies, two-stage network systems operations for converting inputs into outputs have been performed in two stages, meanwhile the intermediate products were considered as the outputs from the first stage and as inputs to the second stage.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The main contributions of this paper are fourfold: (1) we propose models for evaluating the overall efficiency measure of decision making units (DMUs) in a two-stage network structure based on the convex hull in intermediate products; (2) we propose a procedure to determine the target unit of each inefficient DMU; (3) we explain how to calculate the divisional efficiency; (4) we demonstrate the feasibility and richness of the obtained solutions in the context of two examples.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Data envelopment analysis (DEA) · Two-stage network · Intermediate products

Abstract

In recent Data envelopment analysis (DEA) literature, many researchers have examined systems with a two-stage network structure and its pitfalls. In these studies, two-stage network systems operations for converting inputs into outputs have been performed in two stages, meanwhile the intermediate products were considered as the outputs from the first stage and as inputs to the second stage. This duality in dealing with intermediate products imposes restrictions on the pricing of these products. In this paper by focusing on the convexity axiom, we define a new production possibility set. The main contributions of this paper are fourfold: (1) we propose models for evaluating the overall efficiency measure of decision making units (DMUs) in a two-stage network structure based on the convex hull in intermediate products; (2) we propose a procedure to determine the target unit of each inefficient DMU; (3) we explain how to calculate the divisional efficiency; (4) we demonstrate the feasibility and richness of the obtained solutions in the context of two examples.

🔖

Cite This Article

MALEKİ, S., EBRAHİMNEJAD, A., MATİN, R. K. (2022). Two-stage network DEA with convex hull in intermediate products. Hacettepe Journal of Mathematics and Statistics, Cilt: 48 - Sayı: 1, 312–331. https://ajindex.com/articles/530110

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Charnes, A. Cooper, W.W. Rhodes, E. Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research 2, 429--444. 1978.
  2. Charnes, A. Cooper, W.W. Golany, B. Halek, R. Klopp, G. Schmitz, E. Thomas, D., Two phase data envelopment analysis approach to policy evaluation and management of army recruiting activities: Trade offs between Joint Services and Army Advertising. Research Report CCS no. 532, Center for Cybernetic Studies, The University of Texas at Austin, Texas. 1986.
  3. Chen, Y. Cook, W.D. Li, N. Zhu, J. Additive efficiency decomposition in two stage DEA. European Journal of Operational Research 96, 1170--1176. 2009a.
  4. Chen, Y. Liang, L. Zhu, J. Equivalence in two-stage DEA approaches. European Journal of Operational Research 193 (2), 600-604. 2009b.
  5. Chen, Y. Cook, W.D. Zhu, J. Deriving the DEA frontier for two-stage processes. European Journal of Operational Research 202, 138--142. 2010.
  6. Chen, Y. Cook, W. D. Kao, C., Zhu, J., Network DEA pitfall: Divisional efficiency and frontier projection under general network structures. European Journal of Operational Research 226, 507-515. 2013.
  7. Cook, W. D. Seiford L. M. Data envelopment analysis (DEA) thirty years on. European Journal of Operational Research 192, 1-17. 2009.
  8. Ebrahimnejad, A., Tavana,M., Hosseinzadeh Lotfi, F., Shahverdi R. and Yousefpour,M., A three-stage data envelopment analysis model with application to banking industry, Mesurement, 49,308-319. 2014a.
  9. Ebrahimnejad E. and Tavana, M., An interactive MOLP method for identifying target units in Output-Oriented DEA models: The NATO enlargement problem, Measurement, 52, 124-134. 2014b.
  10. Ebrahimnejad, A., Bagherzadeh, M. R., Data envelopment analysis approach for discriminating efficient candidates in voting systems by considering the priority of voters, Hacettepe Journal of Mathematics and Statistics, 49 (1), 165-180. 2016.
  11. Hatami-Marbini, A. Ebrahimnejad, A. Lozano, S. Fuzzy efficiency measures in data envelopment analysis using lexicographic multiobjective approach, Computers \& Industrial Engineering, 105, 362--376. 2017.
  12. Kao, C. Hwang, S.-N. Efficiency decomposition in two-stage data envelopment analysis: an application to non-life insurance companies in Taiwan. European Journal of Operational Research185 (1), 418--429. 2008.
  13. Kao, C. Hwang, S.-N. Decomposition of technical and scale efficiencies in two-stage production systems. European Journal of Operational Research 211,515--519. 2011.
  14. Lovell, C.A.K. Walters, L.C. W