Journals / Hacettepe Journal of Mathematics and Statistics / 2020 / Cilt: 49 - Sayı: 6

An estimation of Phi divergence and its application in testing normality

Pages
2104–2118
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It is shown that each special case of Phi divergence based test is the most powerful in each group of alternatives (depending on symmetry or support).

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this article, a new goodness of fit test for normality is introduced based on Phi divergence.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The test statistic is estimated using spacing and the consistency of the test is proved.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It is shown that each special case of Phi divergence based test is the most powerful in each group of alternatives (depending on symmetry or support).
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Phi divergence measure · Normality test · Spacing

Abstract

In this article, a new goodness of fit test for normality is introduced based on Phi divergence. The test statistic is estimated using spacing and the consistency of the test is proved. Then with replacing some special cases of Phi divergence, the efficiency of each test statistic is analyzed by Monte Carlo simulation against some competitors (based on Phi divergence using kernel density function and also some classical competitors). It is shown that each special case of Phi divergence based test is the most powerful in each group of alternatives (depending on symmetry or support).

🔖

Cite This Article

Tavakoli, M., Noughabi, H. A., Borzadaran, G. R. M. (2022). An estimation of Phi divergence and its application in testing normality. Hacettepe Journal of Mathematics and Statistics, Cilt: 49 - Sayı: 6, 2104–2118. https://ajindex.com/articles/530047

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (19)

  1. I.A. Ahmad and P.E. Lin, A nonparametric estimation of the entropy of the absolutely continuous distribution, IEEE Trans. Inform. Theor. 22, 327-375, 1976
  2. H. Alizadeh Noughabi, A new estimator of Kullback–Leibler information and its application in goodness of fit tests, J. Stat. Comput. Simul. 89 (10), 1914-1934, 2019
  3. H. Alizadeh Noughabi, A new estimator of entropy and its application in testing normality, J. Stat. Comput. Simul. 86, 1151-1162, 2010
  4. H. Alizadeh Noughabi and N.R. Arghami, Monte Carlo comparison of seven normality tests, J. Stat. Comput. Simul. 8, 965-972, 2011a
  5. H. Alizadeh Noughabi and N.R. Arghami, Testing exponentiality based on characterizations of the exponential distribution, J. Stat. Comput. Simul. 81, 1641-1651, 2011b
  6. H. Alizadeh Noughabi and N. Balakrishnan, Tests of goodness of fit based on Phidivergence, J. Appl. Stat. 43 (3), 412-429, 2016
  7. T.W. Anderson and D.A. Darling, A test of goodness of fit, J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 49, 765-769, 1954
  8. I. Arizono and H. Ohta, A test for normality based on Kullback Leibler information, Amer. Statist. 43, 20-23, 1989
  9. V. Balakrishnan and L.D. Sanghvi, Distance between populations on the basis of attribute, Biometrics 24, 859-865, 1968
  10. C.I. Bliss, Statistics in Biology: Statistical methods for research in the natural sciences, McGrawHill Book Company, New York, 1967
  11. B. Choi, Improvement of goodness of fit test for normal distribution, J. Stat. Comput. Simul. 78, 781-788, 2008
  12. J.C. Corea, A new estimator of entropy, Comm. Statist. Theory Methods 24, 2439- 2449, 1995
  13. H. Cramer, On the composition of elementary errors, Scand. Actuar. J. 1, 1374, 1928
  14. E.S. Dudewicz and E.C. Van der Meulen, Entropy-based tests of uniformity, J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 76, 967-974, 1981
  15. A.J. Duncan, Quality Control and Industrial statistics, Homewood (IL), Irwin, 1974
  16. N. Ebrahimi, M. Habibullah and E.S. Soofi, Testing exponentiality based on Kullback- Leibler information, J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B. Stat. Methodol. 54, 739-748, 1992
  17. N. Ebrahimi, K. Pflughoeft and E.S. Soofi, Two measures of sample entropy, Statist. Probab. Lett. 20, 225-234, 1994
  18. M.D. Esteban, M.E. Castellanos, D. Morales and I. Vajda, Monte Carlo comparison of four normality tests using different entropy estimates, Comm. Statist. Simulation Comput. 30, 761-785, 2001
  19. C.M. Jarque and A.K. Bera, A test normality of observations and regression residuals, In