Journals / Hacettepe Journal of Mathematics and Statistics / 2017 / Cilt: 46 - Sayı: 3

Evaluation of life quality by integrated method of AHP and TOPSIS based on interval type-2 fuzzy sets

Pages
511–523
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Furthermore, the rankings were obtained by using AHP and TOPSIS methods under crisp/ fuzzy environment to show performance of the proposed method.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, we present an integrated method of Analytical Hierarchy Process based on interval type-2 fuzzy sets (IT2FAHP) and Techniquefor Order Performance by Similarity to Ideal Solution based on on interval type-2 fuzzy sets (IT2FTOPSIS).
📊
Key Findings & Data:The applicability of the proposedintegrated method was performed on a case study of evaluation of life quality for 28 European Union Countries and other six countries, Iceland,Macedonia, Montenegro, Serbia, Turkey and Kosovo, in terms of 30 subjective criteria.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Furthermore, the rankings were obtained by using AHP and TOPSIS methods under crisp/ fuzzy environment to show performance of the proposed method.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Multi criteria decision making · AHP · TOPSIS

Abstract

In this study, we present an integrated method of Analytical Hierarchy Process based on interval type-2 fuzzy sets (IT2FAHP) and Techniquefor Order Performance by Similarity to Ideal Solution based on on interval type-2 fuzzy sets (IT2FTOPSIS). The applicability of the proposedintegrated method was performed on a case study of evaluation of life quality for 28 European Union Countries and other six countries, Iceland,Macedonia, Montenegro, Serbia, Turkey and Kosovo, in terms of 30 subjective criteria. The weights of the criteria were computed by IT2FAHP and the ranking of life quality for considered countries was constituted by IT2FTOPSIS. Furthermore, the rankings were obtained by using AHP and TOPSIS methods under crisp/ fuzzy environment to show performance of the proposed method.

🔖

Cite This Article

PEHLİVAN, N. Y., ŞAHİN, A. (2022). Evaluation of life quality by integrated method of AHP and TOPSIS based on interval type-2 fuzzy sets. Hacettepe Journal of Mathematics and Statistics, Cilt: 46 - Sayı: 3, 511–523. https://ajindex.com/articles/529984

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Abdullah, L. and Najib, L. A new type-2 fuzzy set of linguistic variables for the fuzzy analytic hierarchy process. Expert Systems with Applications 41 (7), 3297-3305, 2014.
  2. Ashtiani, B., et al. Extension of fuzzy TOPSIS method based on interval-valued fuzzy sets. Applied Soft Computing 9 (2), 457-461, 2009.
  3. Bhutia, P.W. and Phipon, R. Application of AHP and TOPSIS method for supplier selection problem. IOSR Journal of Engineering 2 (10), 43-50, 2012.
  4. Buckley, J.J. Fuzzy hierarchical analysis. Fuzzy sets and systems 17 (3), 233-247, 1985.
  5. Chang, D.-Y. Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP. European journal of operational research 95 (3), 649-655, 1996.
  6. Chen, C.-T. Extensions of the TOPSIS for group decision-making under fuzzy environment. Fuzzy sets and systems 114 (1), 1-9, 2000.
  7. Chen, S.-M. and Lee, L.-W. Fuzzy multiple attributes group decision-making based on the interval type-2 TOPSIS method. Expert systems with applications 37 (4), 2790-2798, 2010.
  8. Chen, T.-Y. A PROMETHEE-based outranking method for multiple criteria decision analysis with interval type-2 fuzzy sets. Soft Computing 18 (5), 923-940, 2014.
  9. Chen, T.-Y. An interval type-2 fuzzy technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solutions using a likelihood-based comparison approach for multiple criteria decision analysis. Computers & Industrial Engineering 85, 57-72, 2015.
  10. Chen, T.-Y. An interval type-2 fuzzy PROMETHEE method using a likelihood-based out- ranking comparison approach. Information Fusion 25, 105-120, 2015.
  11. Chen, T.-Y., Chang, C.-H., and Lu, J.-f.R. The extended QUALIFLEX method for multiple criteria decision analysis based on interval type-2 fuzzy sets and applications to medical decision making. European Journal of Operational Research 226 (3), 615-625, 2013.
  12. Chen, Y.-H., Wang, T.-C., and Wu, C.-Y. Strategic decisions using the fuzzy PROMETHEE for IS outsourcing. Expert Systems with Applications 38 (10), 13216-13222, 2011. Eurofound. [cited 12.01.2016]; Available from: http://www.eurofound.europa.eu/surveys/ european-quality-of-life-surveys-eqls / european-quality-of-life-survey-2012, 2016.
  13. Goumas, M. and Lygerou, V. An extension of the PROMETHEE method for decision mak- ing in fuzzy environment: Ranking of alternative energy exploitation projects. European Journal of Operational Research 123 (3), 606-613, 2000.
  14. Hwang, C.-L. and Yoon, K. Multiple criteria decision making. Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, 1981.
  15. Kahraman, C., et al.