Journals / Hacettepe Journal of Mathematics and Statistics / 2017 / Cilt: 46 - Sayı: 3

Modi ed tests for comparison of group means under heteroskedasticity and non-normality caused by outlier(s)

Pages
493–510
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Results of simulationsclearly indicate that Generalized F-test modied with Huber'sM-estimators achieves the nominal type 1 error rate and provide higherpower than alternative methods.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:There are several approximate tests proposed such as Welch's F-test(W), the Parametric Bootstrap Test (PB) and Generalized F-test (GF)for comparing several group means under heteroskedasticity.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Thesetests are powerful and have nominal type 1 error rates but they are notperforming satisfactorily under non-normality caused by outlier(s).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Results of simulationsclearly indicate that Generalized F-test modied with Huber'sM-estimators achieves the nominal type 1 error rate and provide higherpower than alternative methods.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

There are several approximate tests proposed such as Welch's F-test(W), the Parametric Bootstrap Test (PB) and Generalized F-test (GF)for comparing several group means under heteroskedasticity. Thesetests are powerful and have nominal type 1 error rates but they are notperforming satisfactorily under non-normality caused by outlier(s). Tohandle this problem, we investigate tests that are powerful and providenominal type 1 error rates by using robust estimators both forlocation and scale parameters. The performance of the modied testsare examined with Monte-Carlo simulation studies. Results of simulationsclearly indicate that Generalized F-test modied with Huber'sM-estimators achieves the nominal type 1 error rate and provide higherpower than alternative methods.

🔖

Cite This Article

YAZICI, B., ÇAVUŞOĞLU, M., SEZER, A. (2022). Modi ed tests for comparison of group means under heteroskedasticity and non-normality caused by outlier(s). Hacettepe Journal of Mathematics and Statistics, Cilt: 46 - Sayı: 3, 493–510. https://ajindex.com/articles/529933

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (18)

  1. Yazici, B., Sezer, A., Ozkip, E. Generalized p-value test to compare several population means for unequal variances, Joint Statistical Meetings Proceedings, San Diego, USA, 2012.
  2. Yazici, B., Sezer, A., Ozkip, E. A simulation study to compare several population means under heteroskedasticity, Abstract Book of 5th International Conference of the ERCIM Working Group on Computing and Statistics, Oviedo, SPAIN, 2012. [43] Wu, L.L. Robust M-estimation of location and regression, Sociological Methodology 15, 316-388, 1985.
  3. Wilcox, R.R. Introduction to Robust Estimation and Hypothesis Testing, Elsevier, 2012.
  4. Wilcox, R.R. Simulation results on solutions to the multivariate Behrens-Fisher problem via trimmed means, The Statistician 44 2, 213-225, 1995.
  5. Welch, B.L. On the comparison of several group means values, Biometrika 38, 330-336, 1951.
  6. Weerahandi, S. Generalized Inference in Repeated Measures: Exact Methods in MANOVA and Mixed Models, Wiley, 2004.
  7. Weerahandi, S. Exact Statistical Methods for Data Analysis, Springer, 1995.
  8. Weerahandi, S. ANOVA under unequal error variances, Biometrics 51, 589-599, 1994.
  9. Weerahandi, S. Testing variance components in mixed models with generalized p-values, Journal of the American Statistical Association 86, 151-153, 1991.
  10. Tsui, K. and Weerahandi, S. Generalized p-values in signi cance testing of hypotheses in the presence of nuisance parameters, Journal of the American Statistical Association 84, 602-607, 1989.
  11. Tiku, M. and Akkaya, A. Robust Estimation and Hypothesis Testing, New Age International, 2004.
  12. Tan, W.Y. and Tabatabai, M.A. Some robust ANOVA procedures under heteroskedasticity and non-normality, Communications in Statistics 14 4, 1007-1026, 1985.
  13. So, Y.C. and Sen, P.K. M-estimators based repeated signi cance tests for one-way ANOVA with adaptation to multiple comparisons, Communications in Statistics 1 2, 101-119, 1982.
  14. Schrader, R.M. Robust analysis of variance, Communications in Statistics 6 9, 879-894, 1977.
  15. Sadooghi-Alvandi, S.M., Jafari, A.A., Mardani-Ford, H.A. One-way ANOVA with unequal variances, Communications in Statistics 41, 4200-4221, 2012.
  16. Rousseeuw, P. and Croux, C. Alternatives to the median absolute deviation, Journal of American Statistical Association 88 424, 1273-1283, 1993.
  17. Reed, J.F. and Stark, D.B. Robust analysis of variance: a simulation study, Journal of Applied Statistics 22 1, 87-104, 1995.
  18. Ozkip, E., Yazici, B., Sezer, A. Comparison of tests for the ANOVA with unequal variance, Joint Statis