SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Hacettepe Journal of Mathematics and Statistics / 2018 / Cilt: 47 - Sayı: 2

Two mixed randomized response models under simple and strati ed random sampling with replacement schemes

Fatima BATOOL
Kaneez FATİMA
Zawar HUSSAİN
Pages
403–422
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In order to get the idea of gain in eciency and model stability numerical and graphical eciency comparisons are done for the two models under two mentioned cases.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:We have proposed two mixed randomized response models for surveying sensitive issues.
📊
Key Findings & Data:We proved that the proposed models are unconditionally ecient than [13, 15, 16, 20].
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In order to get the idea of gain in eciency and model stability numerical and graphical eciency comparisons are done for the two models under two mentioned cases.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

We have proposed two mixed randomized response models for surveying sensitive issues. The properties of proposed estimators are derived under the simple and stratied random sampling schemes while considering completely and less than completely truthful reporting cases. We proved that the proposed models are unconditionally ecient than [13, 15, 16, 20]. In order to get the idea of gain in eciency and model stability numerical and graphical eciency comparisons are done for the two models under two mentioned cases.

🔖

Cite This Article

BATOOL, F., FATİMA, K., HUSSAİN, Z. (2022). Two mixed randomized response models under simple and strati ed random sampling with replacement schemes. Hacettepe Journal of Mathematics and Statistics, Cilt: 47 - Sayı: 2, 403–422. https://ajindex.com/articles/529877

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Abdelfatah, S., and Mazloum, R. An improved strati ed randomized response model using two decks of cards, Model Assisted Statistics and Applications, 10 (4), 309-320, 2015.
  2. Al-Menayes, J. Measuring the Spiritual and Behavioral Dimensions of Religiosity in a Mus-lim Sample, Asian Social Science, 12 (2), 158, 2016.
  3. Blair, Graeme, Kosuke Imai, and Yang-Yang Zhou. Design and Analysis of the Randomized Response Technique, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 110 (511), 1304 - 1319, 2015.
  4. Clark, S. J., and Desharnais, R. A. Honest answers to embarrassing questions: Detecting cheating in the randomized response model, Psychological Methods, 3 (2), 160, 1998.
  5. Coutts, E., and Jann, B. Sensitive questions in online surveys: Experimental results for the randomized response technique (RRT) and the unmatched count technique (UCT), Socio-logical Methods and Research, 40 (1), 169-193, 2011.
  6. Greenberg, B. G., Abul-Ela, A. L. A., Simmons, W. R. and Horvitz, D. G. The unrelated question randomized response model: Theoretical framework, Journal of the American Sta-tistical Association, 64 (326), 520-539, 1969.
  7. Holbrook, A. L., and Krosnick, J. A. Measuring Voter Turnout By Using The Randomized Response Technique Evidence Calling Into Question The Method's Validity Public Opinion Quarterly, 74 (2), 328-343, 2010.
  8. Hong, K., Yum, J. and Lee, H. A strati ed randomized response technique Korean Journal of Applied Statistics, 7, 141-147, 1994.
  9. Jin, Z., Zhu, Z., Yu, B. and Gao, Ge. A Monte Carlo Simulation Investigating the Validity and Reliability of Two Stage Cluster Sampling Survey with Sensitive Topics Computer Modelling and New Technologies, 17 (3), 69 - 75, 2013.
  10. Kim, J. M. and Elam, M. E. A two-stage strati ed Warner's randomized response model using optimal allocation Metrika, 61 (1), 1-7, 2005.
  11. Kim, J. M. and Elam, M. E. A strati ed unrelated question randomized response model Statistical Papers, 48 (2), 215-233, 2007.
  12. Kim, J. M. and Warde, W. D. A strati ed Warner's randomized response model Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 120 (1), 155-165, 2004.
  13. Kim, J. M. and Warde, W. D. A mixed randomized response model Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 133 (1), 211-221, 2005.
  14. Locander, W., Sudman, S., and Bradburn, N. An investigation of interview method, threat and response distortion Journal of the American Statistical Association, 71 (354), 269-275, 1976. [Mangat, N. S., Singh, R., and Singh, S. Violation of respondent's privacy in moors