Journals / Hacettepe Journal of Mathematics and Statistics / 2019 / Cilt: 48 - Sayı: 2

ST2, ∆T2, ST3, ∆T3, Tychonoff, compact and ∂-connected objects in the category of proximity spaces

Pages
490–500
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Finally, we investigate the relationships between ∂-connected object and (strongly) connected object in the topological category of proximity space.Mathematics Subject Classification (2010). 54B30, 54D10, 54A05, 54E05, 18B99, 18D15

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Inthispaper,anexplicitcharacterizationoftheseparationproperties ST2,∆T2, ST3,∆T3 and Tychonoff objects are given in the topological category of proximity space.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Moreover, we investigate the relationships among ST2, ∆T2, ST3, ∆T3, the separation properties at a point p, the generalized separation properties Ti, i = 0,1,2, T0, T1, T2 and Tychonoff objects in this category.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Finally, we investigate the relationships between ∂-connected object and (strongly) connected object in the topological category of proximity space.Mathematics Subject Classification (2010). 54B30, 54D10, 54A05, 54E05, 18B99, 18D15
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2010 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Inthispaper,anexplicitcharacterizationoftheseparationproperties ST2,∆T2, ST3,∆T3 and Tychonoff objects are given in the topological category of proximity space. Furthermore, the (strongly) compact object and ∂-connected object are also characterized in the category of proximity space. Moreover, we investigate the relationships among ST2, ∆T2, ST3, ∆T3, the separation properties at a point p, the generalized separation properties Ti, i = 0,1,2, T0, T1, T2 and Tychonoff objects in this category. Finally, we investigate the relationships between ∂-connected object and (strongly) connected object in the topological category of proximity space.Mathematics Subject Classification (2010). 54B30, 54D10, 54A05, 54E05, 18B99, 18D15

🔖

Cite This Article

Kula, M. (2022). ST2, ∆T2, ST3, ∆T3, Tychonoff, compact and ∂-connected objects in the category of proximity spaces. Hacettepe Journal of Mathematics and Statistics, Cilt: 48 - Sayı: 2, 490–500. https://ajindex.com/articles/529790

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (20)

  1. J. Adámek, H. Herrlich and G.E. Strecker, Abstract and Concrete Categories, John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1990
  2. M. Baran, Separation properties, Indian J. Pure Appl. Math. 23 (5), 333-341, 1992
  3. M. Baran, Separation Properties at p for the topological categories of reflexive relation spaces and preordered spaces, Math. Balkanica (N.S.) 6 (2), 193-198, 1992
  4. M. Baran, The notion of closedness in topological categories, Comment. Math. Univ. Carolin. 34 (2), 383-395, 1993
  5. M. Baran, Generalized local separation properties, Indian J. Pure Appl. Math. 25 (6), 615-620, 1994
  6. M. Baran, Separation properties in topological categories, Math. Balkanica (N.S.) 10 (1), 39-48, 1996
  7. M. Baran, A notion of compactness in topological categories, Publ. Math. Debrecen 50 (3-4), 221-234, 1997
  8. M. Baran, T3 and T4-objects in topological categories, Indian J. Pure Appl. Math. 29 (1), 59-69, 1998
  9. M. Baran, Completely regular objects and normal objects in topological categories, Acta Math. Hungar. 80 (3), 211-224, 1998
  10. M. Baran, Closure operators in convergence spaces, Acta Math. Hungar. 87 (1-2), 33-45, 2000
  11. M. Baran, Compactness, perfectness, separation, minimality and closedness with re- spect to closure operators, Appl. Categ. Structures 10 (4), 403-415, 2002
  12. M. Baran, PreT2-objects in topological categories, Appl. Categ. Structures 17 (6), 591-602, 2009, DOI: 10.1007/s10485-008-9161-4
  13. M. Baran and J. Al-Safar, Quotient-reflective and bireflective subcategories of the category of preordered sets, Topology Appl. 158 (15), 2076-2084, 2011, DOI 10.1016/j.topol.2011.06.043
  14. M. Baran and M. Kula, A note on separation and compactness in categories of con- vergence spaces, Proceedings of the International Conference on Applicable General Topology, Ankara, 2001, Appl. Gen. Topol. 4 (1), 1-13, 2003
  15. M. Baran and M. Kula, A note on connectedness, Publ. Math. Debrecen 68 (3-4), 489-501, 2006
  16. N. Bourbaki, General Topology, Addison-Wesley Publ. Co., 1966
  17. D. Dikranjan and E. Giuli, Closure operators I, Proceedings of the 8th international conference on categorical topology, L’Aquila, 1986, Topology Appl. 27 (2), 129-143, 1987
  18. V.A. Efremovich, Infinitesimal spaces (Russian), Doklady Akad. Nauk SSSR (N.S.) 76, 341-343, 1951
  19. L.M. Friedler, Mappings of Proximity Spaces, PH.D. Thesis, University of Alberta, 1972
  20. L.M. Friedler, Quotients of proximity spaces, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 37 (2), 589-5