Besides, an illustration of the proposed test was given by using a sample dataset.
📌 3 Key Takeaways
🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, a new testing procedure is proposed to compare two linear regression models based on a computational approach test when the variances are not assumed to be equal.
📊
Key Findings & Data:To assess performance of the proposed test, it was compared with some existing tests in terms of power and type I error rate of the test.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Besides, an illustration of the proposed test was given by using a sample dataset.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Chow Test · Computational Approach Test · Parametric Bootstrap Test
Abstract
In this study, a new testing procedure is proposed to compare two linear regression models based on a computational approach test when the variances are not assumed to be equal. This method is based on restricted maximum likelihood estimators and some simple computational steps. To assess performance of the proposed test, it was compared with some existing tests in terms of power and type I error rate of the test. The simulation study reveals that the proposed test is a better alternative than some existing tests in most considered cases. Besides, an illustration of the proposed test was given by using a sample dataset.
Gökpınar, F., Gökpınar, E., Ebegil, M., Özdemir, Y. A., Yazıcı, M. E. (2022). A computational approach test for comparing two linear regression models with unequal variances. Hacettepe Journal of Mathematics and Statistics, Cilt: 50 - Sayı: 6, 1756–1772. https://ajindex.com/articles/529466
M.M. Ali and J.L. Silver, Tests for equality between sets of coefficients in two linear regressions under heteroscedasticity, J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 80 (391), 730-735, 1985
C.H. Chang, J.J. Lin and N. Pal, Testing the equality of several gamma means: A parametric bootstrap method with applications, Comput. Statist. 26 (1), 55-76, 2011
C.H. Chang and N. Pal, A revisit to the Behren-Fisher Problem: Comparison of five test methods, Comm. Statist. Simulation Comput. 37 (6), 1064-1085, 2008
C.H. Chang, N. Pal, W.K. Lim and J. J. Lin, A note on comparing several Poisson means, Comm. Statist. Simulation Comput. 39 (8), 1605-1627, 2010
G.C. Chow, Tests of equality between sets of coefficients in two linear regressions, Econometrica 28 (3), 591-605, 1960
M.D. Conerly and E.R. Mansfield, An approximate test for comparing heteroscedastic regression models, J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 83 (403), 811-817, 1988
A.C. Davison and D.V. Hinkley, Bootstrap Methods and their Application, Cambridge University Press, 1997
T.J. Diciccio, M.A. Martin and S.E. Stern, Simple and accurate one-sided inference from signed roots of likelihood ratios, Canad. J. Statist. 29 (1), 67-76, 2001
E.Y. Gokpinar and F. Gokpinar, A test based on the computational approach for equality of means under the unequal variance assumption, Hacet. J. Math. Stat. 41(4), 605-613, 2012
E.Y. Gokpinar, E. Polat, F. Gokpinar and S. Gunay, A new computational approach for testing equality of inverse gaussian means under heterogeneity, Hacet. J. Math. Stat. 42 (5), 581-590, 2013
F. Gokpinar and E. Gokpinar, Testing the equality of several Log-normal means based on a computational approach, Comm. Statist. Simulation Comput. 46 (3), 1998-2010, 2017
S.M. Goldfeld and R.E. Quandt, Asymptotic tests for the constancy of regressions in the heteroscedastic case, Econometric Research Program Research Memorandum, Princeton University 229, 1978
S.A. Gupta, Testing the equality between sets of coefficients in two linear regressions when disturbances are unequal, PhD thesis, Purdue University, 1978
H. Haghbin, M.R. Mahmoudi and Z. Shishebor, Large sample inference on the ratio of two independent binomial proportions, J. Math. Ext. 5 (1), 87-95, 2015
D.J. Hand, F. Daly, A.D. Lunn, K.J. McConway and E. Ostrowski, A Handbook of Small Data Sets, Chapman and Hall, 1994
Y. Honda, On tests of equality between sets of coefficients in two linear regres