Journals / Hand and Microsurgery / 2021 / Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 3

Adult single finger flexor zone 2 total amputation – Single center replantation results

Pages
211–218
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

On the other hand, some studies concluded that as the replantation results do not differ from stump closure, one should not immediately head towards stump closure.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives: Replantation of a single finger amputated at the flexor zone 2 level keeps contradicting because the replanted finger may get in the way of other digits due to stiffness.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: Twenty-one patients with replantation for single finger flexor zone 2 total amputation were enrolled in the study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:On the other hand, some studies concluded that as the replantation results do not differ from stump closure, one should not immediately head towards stump closure.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objectives: Replantation of a single finger amputated at the flexor zone 2 level keeps contradicting because the replanted finger may get in the way of other digits due to stiffness. On the other hand, some studies concluded that as the replantation results do not differ from stump closure, one should not immediately head towards stump closure. Therefore, we aimed to present our functional results of this level of replantation. Methods: Twenty-one patients with replantation for single finger flexor zone 2 total amputation were enrolled in the study. Kirschner wires were used to fix the bone. Only flexor digitorum profundus (FDP) tendon was repaired. Two veins per digital artery were anastomosed. Early motion was allowed from the third postoperative week. The functional results were assessed by Quick-DASH and modified Mayo scores, total active range of motion (TAM), and presence of cold intolerance. Results: The mean follow-up period was 33.9 (range 24-79) months. The mean Quick-DASH score was 18.1±8.6 (range 2.3-38.6). According to the modified Mayo score, three patients had excellent, nine had good, seven had fair, and two had poor results. TAM was found to be excellent in three, good in eleven, fair in five, and poor in two patients. Conclusion: We recommend bone fixation preserving the joints, only FDP tendon repair, vein anastomoses as many as possible, and early motion to achieve successful results in single finger amputations replanted at the flexor zone 2 leve

🔖

Cite This Article

Orman, O., Baydar, M., Sencan, A., Adiguzel, I. F., Ozturk, K. (2022). Adult single finger flexor zone 2 total amputation – Single center replantation results. Hand and Microsurgery, Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 3, 211–218. https://ajindex.com/articles/528883

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (17)

  1. Diwany El-Diwany M, Odobescu A, Bélanger-Dou- et M, Berbiche D, Arsenault J, Bou-Merhi J, et al. Replantation vs revision amputation in single digit zone II amputations. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2015;68:859-63
  2. Sebastin SJ, Chung KC. A systematic review of the outcomes of replantation of distal digital amputa- tion. Plast Reconstr Surg 2011;128:723e37
  3. Yamano Y. Replantation of the amputated distal part of the fingers. J Hand Surg Am 1985;10:211-8
  4. Waikakul S, Sakkarnkosol S, Vanadurongwan V, Un-nanuntana A. Results of 1018 digital replanta- tions in 552 patients. Injury 2000;31:33e40
  5. Maki Y. Digital Replantation. In: Boyd JB, Jones NF (eds.) Operative Microsurgery, 1st ed. McGraw- Hill Education, 2015:685-97
  6. Higgins JP. Replantation. In: Wolfe SW, Hotchkiss RN, Pederson WC, Kozin SH, Cohen MS (eds.) Green’s Operative Hand Surgery, 7th ed. Elsevier, Philadelphia, 2017:1476-85
  7. Buntic RF, Brooks D, Buncke GM. Index Finger Salvage with Replantation and Revascularization: Revisiting Conventional Wisdom. Microsurgery 2008;28:612-6
  8. Jobe MT. Microsurgery. In: Azar FM, Beaty JH, Canale ST (eds.) Campbell’s Operative Ortho- paedics. Vol. 4, 13th ed. Elsevier, Philadelphia, 2017:3225-97
  9. Chang J, Jones N. Twelve simple maneuvers to op- timize digital replantation and revascularization. Tech Hand Up Extrem Surg 2004;8:161e6
  10. Urbaniak JR, Roth JH, Nunley JA, Goldner RD, Koman LA. The results of replantation after am- putation of a single finger. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1985;67:611e9
  11. Fırat C, Aytekin AH, Erbatur S, Geyik Y, Elmas Ö. Our experiences on the replantations of zone 2 level in children. Dicle Medical Journal 2012;39:276-9
  12. Woo SH, Kim YW, Cheon HJ, Nam HJ, Kang DH, Kim JM, et al. Management of complications re- lating to finger amputation and replantation. Hand Clin 2015;31:319-38
  13. Lee BI, Chung HY, Kim WK, Kim SW, Dhong ES. The effects of the number and ratio of repaired ar- teries and veins the survival rate in digital replanta- tion. Ann Plast Surg 2000;44:288–94
  14. Kaplan FT, Raskin KB. Indications and surgical techniques for digit replantation. Bull Hosp Jt Dis 2001;60:179e88
  15. Kleinert HE, Verdan C. Report of the committee on tendon injuries (International Federation of Societies for Surgery of the Hand). J Hand Surg Am 1983;8(5 Part 2):794–8
  16. Chung KC, Alderman AK. Replantation of the up- per extremity: indications and outcomes. J Hand Surg Am 2002;2:78–94
  17. Whitney TM, Lineaweaver WC, Bunc