Journals / Güvenlik Stratejileri Dergisi / 2022 / Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 42

Reading the USA through Strategy Documents: An Analysis on the Change of Hegemonic Security Understanding

ABD’yi Strateji Belgeleri Üzerinden Okumak: Hegemonik Güvenlik Anlayışının Değişimi Üzerine Bir Analiz

Pages
265–293
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This article examines the change in the understanding of hegemonic security within the framework of a combination of the research methods, which consists of historical and content analysis, using the concepts related to the subject.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:It is possible to look for the foundations of the USA’s hegemonic security understanding in the days when the Second World War ended.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In the formation of this perception, in addition to the practices of the USA, the discourses of the US Presidents and the imposing policies of the Soviet period have a share, albeit at different rates.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This article examines the change in the understanding of hegemonic security within the framework of a combination of the research methods, which consists of historical and content analysis, using the concepts related to the subject.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Uluslararası Güvenlik · Ulusal Güvenlik Stratejisi · Amerika Birleşik Devletleri

Abstract

It is possible to look for the foundations of the USA’s hegemonic security understanding in the days when the Second World War ended. In fact, it is undeniable that this situation creates a perception of confusion all over the world, but especially in countries classified as “allies” of the USA. In the formation of this perception, in addition to the practices of the USA, the discourses of the US Presidents and the imposing policies of the Soviet period have a share, albeit at different rates. Although the number of opponents has increased today, the US military power is superior to that of other states, and the technological repercussions of this power still continue to be envied. This article examines the change in the understanding of hegemonic security within the framework of a combination of the research methods, which consists of historical and content analysis, using the concepts related to the subject.

Özet

ABD’nin hegemonik güvenlik anlayışının temellerini İkinci Dünya Savaşı’nın bittiği günlerde aramak mümkündür. Aslında bu durumun tüm dünyada ama özellikle ABD’nin “müttefikleri” olarak sınıflandırılan ülkelerde bir kanıksama algısı yarattığı da yadsınamaz. Bu algının oluşumunda ABD’nin uygulamalarının yanında, ABD Başkanları’nın söylemlerinin ve Sovyet dönemi dayatmacı politikalarının değişik oranlarda da olsa payları bulunmaktadır. Bugün katılmayanların sayısı artmış da olsa, ABD askerî gücü diğer devletlerinkinden üstündür ve bu gücün teknolojik yansımaları halen özenilen olmaya devam etmektedir. Bu makalede hegemonik güvenlik anlayışındaki değişim, konuyla ilişkili kavramlardan da yararlanılarak, tarihsel analiz ve içerik analizini kapsayan bir yöntem kombinasyonu çerçevesinde incelenmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

KÖRPE, Ö. (2022). Reading the USA through Strategy Documents: An Analysis on the Change of Hegemonic Security Understanding. Güvenlik Stratejileri Dergisi, Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 42, 265–293. https://ajindex.com/articles/528226

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (26)

  1. AL-RODHAN, Nayef R.F. Editorial of GCSP Policy Brief No. 15: US Hegemony and Globalization, Geneva Centre for Security Policy, Geneva, Switzerland December 6, 2006.
  2. BAUER, Walther. A Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament and Other Early Christian Literature, Eds. F.Willam Danker, 3rd Edition,
  3. University of Chicago Press,
  4. Chicago, IL, 2001.
  5. EIDENMULLER, Michael. Great Speeches For Better Speaking: Listen and Learn from History’s Most Memorable Speeches, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, 2008.
  6. FUKUYAMA, Francis. The End of History and the Last Man, the Free Press,
  7. New York, NY, 1992.
  8. GADDIS, John Lewis. We Now Know: Rethinking Cold War History, Oxford University Press,
  9. New York, NY, 1997.
  10. GRAMSCI, Antonio. Prison Notebooks Vol.3, Edited by Joseph A. Buttigieg, Colombia University Press,
  11. New York, NY, 2007.
  12. HIGGS, Robert. Opposing the Crusader State: Alternatives to Global Interventionism, The Independent Institute, Oakland, CA, 2007.
  13. KEOHANE, Robert O. After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy, Princeton University Press,
  14. Princeton, NJ, 1984.
  15. NEUMAN, W. Lawrence. Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches, 7th Edition,
  16. Pearson, Essex, 2013.
  17. NYE, Joseph S. Jr. Soft Power: The Means to Success in World Politics, Public Affairs, New York, NY, 2005.
  18. NYE, Joseph S. Jr. The Paradox of American Power: Why The World’s Only Superpower Can’t Go It Alone, Oxford University Press,
  19. Oxford, BK 2002.
  20. VOLGY, Thomas J. KANTHAK, Kristin, FRAIZER, Derrick and INGERSOLL, Robert S., Resistance to Hegemony within the Core, Matthew B. Ridgway Center for International Security Studies, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, 2005.
  21. BARRETT, Michile. “Ideology, Politics, Hegemony: from Gramsci to Laclau and Mouffe”, in Eds. Slavoj ZIZEK, Mapping Ideology, Verso, London, 1994, pp. 235-264.
  22. COX, Robert W. “Gramsci, Hegemony and International Relations. An Essay in Method”, in Eds. Stephen Gill, Gramsci, Historical materialism and International Relations, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1993, pp. 49-66.
  23. STRANGE, Susan. “Toward a Theory of Transnational Empire”, in Eds. Ernst-Otto Czempiel and James N. Rosenau, Global Changes and Theoretical Challenges: Approaches to World Politics for the 1990s,
  24. Lexington Books, Lexington, 1989.
  25. HEISBOURG, François. “American Hegemony? Perceptions of the U.S. Abroad”, Survival, 41/4, 1999, pp. 5-19.
  26. KEOHANE, Robert O. “The United States and the Postwar Order: Empire or Hegemony?”, Journal of Peac