Journals / Boğaziçi Üniversitesi Eğitim Dergisi / 2014 / Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 1

Gender and Classroom Interaction: Examining A Female and A Male Teacher’s Moves Directed Towards Female and Male Students in Two EFL Classrooms in Turkey

Pages
59–80
Publication Date
2016-02-16
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results of the study are discussed in reference to relevant literature on gender and classroom interaction and the authors draw attention to pedagogical implications.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Öz This article examines a female teacher’s and a male teacher’s interactions with female and male students in English as a Foreign Language (EFL) classrooms.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The lessons were transcribed and analysed using an adaptation of Sinclair and Coulthard’s (1975, 1992) Classroom Discourse Analysis Model.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results of the study are discussed in reference to relevant literature on gender and classroom interaction and the authors draw attention to pedagogical implications.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Anahtar Kelimeler Gender and Classroom Interaction · Teacher-Student Interaction · In/Equality in the Classroom

Özet

Öz This article examines a female teacher’s and a male teacher’s interactions with female and male students in English as a Foreign Language (EFL) classrooms. Lessons in two EFL classrooms in the preparatory school of a state university in Turkey, one classroom with a female teacher and the other with a male teacher, were observed and video-taped for two months. The lessons were transcribed and analysed using an adaptation of Sinclair and Coulthard’s (1975, 1992) Classroom Discourse Analysis Model. The findings of the study showed that in general there was not an equal distribution between teachers’ moves, both academic and nonacademic, directed to female and male students in either classroom. The results of the study are discussed in reference to relevant literature on gender and classroom interaction and the authors draw attention to pedagogical implications.

🔖

Cite This Article

BAĞ, E., MARTI, L., BAYYURT, Y. (2016). Gender and Classroom Interaction: Examining A Female and A Male Teacher’s Moves Directed Towards Female and Male Students in Two EFL Classrooms in Turkey. Boğaziçi Üniversitesi Eğitim Dergisi, Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 1, 59–80. https://ajindex.com/articles/52777

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Alcón, E. (1994). The role of participation and gender in non-native speakers’ classroom interaction. Working Papers on Language, Gender and Sexism, 4 (1), 51–68.
  2. Aukrust, V.G. (2008). Boys’ and girls’ conversational participation across four grade levels in Norwegian classrooms: Taking the floor or being given the floor? Gender and Education, 20 (3), 237–252.
  3. Bacon, S., & M. Finnemann. (1992). Sex differences in self-reported beliefs about foreign- language learning and authentic oral and written input. Language Learning 42 (4), 471– 495. Bağ, E. (2012). Gender representation in EFL textbooks in Turkey: A follow-up to the 2008 study. Paper presented at the 56th Annual Conference of the Comparative and International Education Society, April 22-27, 2012,
  4. San Juan, Puerto Rico. Bağ, E., & Bayyurt, B. (2008). Gender representation in foreign language textbooks in Turkey. Paper presented at the 5th International ELT Research Conference Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University (ÇOMÜ), May 23-25, 2008,
  5. Çanakkale, Turkey. Bayyurt, Y. (1999). Research report: The analysis of the interactional strategies of female and male university students in an EFL setting. Supported by The Commission of Boğaziçi University Scientific Research Projects, Project Number: 99HD601. Bayyurt, Y., & Litosseliti, L. (2006). Gender and language in education. In L. Litosseliti (ed.), Gender and language: Theory and practice, 73 –89. London: Hodder Arnold. Bennett, R.E., Gottesman, R.L., Rock, D.A., & Cerullo, F. (1993). Influence of behavior perceptions and gender on teachers' judgments of students' academic skill. Journal of Educational Psychology 85 (2), 347– 356. Brady, K.L.,& Eisler, R.M. (1999). Sex and gender in the college classroom: A quantitative analysis of faculty-student interactions and perceptions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91 (1), 127 –145. Brandell, G., & Staberg, E. (2008). Mathematics: A female, male or gender-neutral domain? A study of attitudes among students at secondary level. Gender and Education 20 (5), 495–509.
  6. Burnett, P.C. (2002). Teacher praise and feedback and students’ perceptions of the classroom environment. Educational Psychology, 22 (1), 5–16.
  7. Carr, J., & Pauwels, A. (2006). Boys and foreign language learning: Real boys don't do languages. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Chen, E.S. L., &Rao, N. (2011). Gender socialization in Chinese kindergartens: Teachers’ contributions. Sex Roles 64, 103–116.
  8. Chin, C. (2006). Classroom interaction in science: Teacher