SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Göztepe Tıp Dergisi / 2003 / Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 1

Diagnostic value of ultrasonography and color doppler ultrasonography in discriminating benign and malign adnexial masses

Selim ve habis adneksiyal kitlelerin ayırımında ultrasonografi ve renkli doppler ultrasonografinin tanısal değeri

Fahrettin KANADIKIRIK
Kayataş Semra ESER
Erkan COŞKUN
M. Murat NAKİ
Pages
40–43
Publication Date
2022-10-17
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

With the use of these tests we determined the sensitivity, spesificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of each tests.With the threshold values, in Sassone ultrasonographic scoring system 9 for PI in colour Doppler examination

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:To determine the dignostic value of ultrasonography and color doppler ultrasonography in discriminating benign and malign adnexinl masses.To discriminate the benign and malign masses; ultrasonography and color doppler ultrasonography were perhormed to 61 patients who were hospitalized in SSK Göztepe Maternity hospital in between 1.4.2000-15.3.2001 and who had taken the operation indıcation.
📊
Key Findings & Data:To determine the dignostic value of ultrasonography and color doppler ultrasonography in discriminating benign and malign adnexinl masses.To discriminate the benign and malign masses; ultrasonography and color doppler ultrasonography were perhormed to 61 patients who were hospitalized in SSK Göztepe Maternity hospital in between 1.4.2000-15.3.2001 and who had taken the operation indıcation.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:With the use of these tests we determined the sensitivity, spesificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of each tests.With the threshold values, in Sassone ultrasonographic scoring system 9 for PI in colour Doppler examination
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2000 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

To determine the dignostic value of ultrasonography and color doppler ultrasonography in discriminating benign and malign adnexinl masses.To discriminate the benign and malign masses; ultrasonography and color doppler ultrasonography were perhormed to 61 patients who were hospitalized in SSK Göztepe Maternity hospital in between 1.4.2000-15.3.2001 and who had taken the operation indıcation. With the use of these tests we determined the sensitivity, spesificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of each tests.With the threshold values, in Sassone ultrasonographic scoring system 9 for PI in colour Doppler examination

Özet

Selim ve habis adneksiyal kitlelerin ayırımında ultrasonografi ve renkli doppler ultrasonografinin tanısal değerinin belirlenmesi.1.4.200-15.3.2001 tarihleri arasında SSK Göztepe Eğitim Hastanesi Kadın Hastalıkları ve Doğum Kliniğine pelvik kitle ön tanısı ile yatan ve operasyon endikasyonu verilen 61 hastaya selim-habis ayırımı için ultrasonografi, ve renkli doppler ultrasonografi yapıldı. Bu testlerin kullanımı ile her bir testin duyarlılık, özgüllük, pozitif öngörü değeri (PPD) ve negatif öngörü değeri (NPD) oranları belirlendi.Sasone ultrasonografik skorlama sistemine göre eşik değer 9 ve renkli doppler incelemede PI (pulsatılite indeks) için eşik değer

🔖

Cite This Article

KANADIKIRIK, F., ESER, K. S., COŞKUN, E., NAKİ, M. M. (2022). Diagnostic value of ultrasonography and color doppler ultrasonography in discriminating benign and malign adnexial masses. Göztepe Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 1, 40–43. https://ajindex.com/articles/526472

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Atasü T, Şahmay: Adneksiyal kitlelerin değerlendirilmesi. Jinekoloji, Universal Dil Hizmetleri ve Yayıncılık A.Ş: İstanbul; 37, 1996
  2. Morrow CPi Malignan and borderline epithelial tumors of ovary. Clinical features staging, diagnosis, intraoperative assesment and review of management in Gyneocologic Oncology, Coppleson M. 2nd edition, V:2 New York, Churchill Livingstone, p.889-92, 1992
  3. Sassone AM, Timor Tritsch JE, Artner A, Westhaff C: Trans-vaginal sonographic characterization of ovarian disease: evulation ofnew scoring system to predict ovarian malignancy. Obstet Gyneocol 78:70-6,1991
  4. Muirc, Watehause J, Moock Tet al: Cancer incidence in five continents LARCL yon, France 88:892-3,1987
  5. Parrozzini F, Franceschi S, La Vecchia C, et al: The epidemiology of ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol; 43:9-23, 1991
  6. Cramer DW, Welc WR: Determinants of ovarian cancer risk.I. Reproductive experiences and family history. J Natl Cancer Inst 71:711-4,1983
  7. Parker SL, Tong T, Bolden S, Wingo PA: Cancer statistics. 65:5-27, 1996
  8. Fleischer AC, Rodgers WH, Rao BK, et al: Assement of ovarian tumors vascularity wit transvaginal color doppler sonography. J Ultrasound Med. 10:563-8,1991
  9. Brown DL, Frater MC, Loing FC, Waitakin ED, Muto MG: Ovarian masses:Can benign and malign lesions differentiated with color and pulsed doppler USG. Radiology 190:33-6, 1992
  10. Kawai M, Kano T, Kikkawa F, Maeda O, Oguchi H: Transvaginal doppler ultrasound with color flow in the diagnosis of ovarian cancer. Obstet Gyneocol 79:163-7, 1992
  11. Bromley B, Goodman H, Benacerraf BR: Comparision between sonographic morphology and doppler waveform for the diagnosis ofovarian malignancy. Obstet Gyneocol 83:434-7, 1994
  12. Timmermon D, Bourne TH, Tailor A: Comparison of methods for preoperative discrimination between malignant and benign adnex-al masses. AM J Obstet Gyncol 1987:57-65, 1999
  13. Kurjak A, Zalud I, Alfırec Z: Evaluation of adnexal masses with transvaginal color ultrasound. J Ultrasound Med 10:295-7,1991
  14. Hamper UM, Sheth S, Abbor FM, et al: Transvaginal color doppler sonography of adneksial masses: Differences in blood flow impedance in benign and malign lesions. AJR 160:1225-8, 1993
  15. Bourne TH, Cambell S, Reynolds KM, et al: Serening for early familial ovarian cancer with transvaginal ultrasonography and color doppler. Br Med J 306:1205-9, 1993.