SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Göztepe Tıp Dergisi / 2005 / Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 2

Unilateral noncomminican uterus didelphus

Tek taraflı nonkomminikan uterus didelfis

Esra Bahar GÜR
Sefa KURT
Şivekar TINAR
Esin ÇELİK
Pages
118–119
Publication Date
2022-10-17
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Even though there are several treatment modalities in literature, we decided on hemihisterectomy by laparotomy.As a result, in differential diagnosis of unilateral pelvic, mullerian anomalies must also be considered and USG and MRG may be of important in investigation of such cases.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The incidence of congenital mullerian anomalies is as high as 3.2 % in population.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The patient 24 years old was referred to our hospital with a pelvik mass of 5 cm. diameter.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Even though there are several treatment modalities in literature, we decided on hemihisterectomy by laparotomy.As a result, in differential diagnosis of unilateral pelvic, mullerian anomalies must also be considered and USG and MRG may be of important in investigation of such cases.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The incidence of congenital mullerian anomalies is as high as 3.2 % in population. Uterus didelphus is one of most frequent anomalies among mullerian anomalies.We present a case of uterus didelphus with a blind vaginal pouch. The patient 24 years old was referred to our hospital with a pelvik mass of 5 cm. diameter. She had congenital unilateral renal agenezia and a history of cesarean section 2 years ago. After US and MRI, the diagnosis was uterus didelphus. Even though there are several treatment modalities in literature, we decided on hemihisterectomy by laparotomy.As a result, in differential diagnosis of unilateral pelvic, mullerian anomalies must also be considered and USG and MRG may be of important in investigation of such cases.

🔖

Cite This Article

GÜR, E. B., KURT, S., TINAR, Ş., ÇELİK, E. (2022). Unilateral noncomminican uterus didelphus. Göztepe Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 2, 118–119. https://ajindex.com/articles/526443

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Simon C, Martinez L, Pardo F, et al: Müllerian defects in women with normal reoroduetive outcome.Fertil.Steril 56:1192-1193, 1991
  2. Rev. Chil. Obstet. Ginecol 56(0:3-8, 1991
  3. J. Am, Assoc Gynecol. Laparosc 9(3):376-379, 2002
  4. Amara DP, Nezhat F, Giudice L, et al: Laparoscopik management of a noncomminicating uterine horn in a patient with an acute abdomen. Surg Larasc Endosc 7:56-59, 1997
  5. Nezhat F, Nezhat CR, Bess O, et al: Laparoscopik amputationof an noncomminicating rudimentery horn after a hysterocopic diagnosis:a case study. Surg Laparosc Endosc 4:155-156, 1994
  6. Buttram VC, Gibbons WE: Müllerian anomalies a proposed classification (an analsis of 144 cases). Fertil Steril 32:40-46, 1979
  7. Silber CG, Magnes KL, Farber M: Dublication of the with a noncomminicating functioning uterine horn. Mt. Sinai J Med 57:374-377, 1990
  8. Doyce MB: Magnetic resonance imaging in müllerian fusion defects. J Reprod Med 37:33-38, 1992.