Journals / Göztepe Tıp Dergisi / 2005 / Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 3

Comparing the results of shoulder examination tests and magnetic resonance imaging of the shoulder

Omuz muayene testleri ile omuz manyetik rezonans görüntüleme sonuçlarının karşılaştırılması

Pages
140–142
Publication Date
2022-10-17
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Specificity and sensitivity figures of O'Brein test are deemed to be high in terms of indicating anterior labral defect, which is difficult to diagnose by examination.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:To identify the sensitivity and specificity between the frequently used shoulder examination tests and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the shoulder.8 blind shoulder examination tests have been performed by the same physician on 117 patients, whose Shoulder MRI is demanded.
📊
Key Findings & Data:On the basis of MRI results, taken as the main diagnosis test, sensitivity and specificity are calculated.Results: 1-Hawkins test has 91 % sensitivity, 85 % specificity; 2-Tump-up and Global ROM has 95 % and 32 %; 3-Yergeson test 28 % and 50 %; 4-Speed test 26 % and 59 %; 5- Lift-off test 70 % and 99 %; 6-M. supraspinatus stress test 82 % and 92 %; 7-M. infraspinatus and m. teres minor stress test 82 % and 76 %; 8-O'Brein test 74 % and 72 % sensitivity and specificity respectively.Hawkins test has high figures of sensitivity and specificity in the diagnosis of shoulder impingement syndrome.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Specificity and sensitivity figures of O'Brein test are deemed to be high in terms of indicating anterior labral defect, which is difficult to diagnose by examination.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

To identify the sensitivity and specificity between the frequently used shoulder examination tests and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the shoulder.8 blind shoulder examination tests have been performed by the same physician on 117 patients, whose Shoulder MRI is demanded. Test results are compared with the MRI reports. On the basis of MRI results, taken as the main diagnosis test, sensitivity and specificity are calculated.Results: 1-Hawkins test has 91 % sensitivity, 85 % specificity; 2-Tump-up and Global ROM has 95 % and 32 %; 3-Yergeson test 28 % and 50 %; 4-Speed test 26 % and 59 %; 5- Lift-off test 70 % and 99 %; 6-M. supraspinatus stress test 82 % and 92 %; 7-M. infraspinatus and m. teres minor stress test 82 % and 76 %; 8-O'Brein test 74 % and 72 % sensitivity and specificity respectively.Hawkins test has high figures of sensitivity and specificity in the diagnosis of shoulder impingement syndrome. MRI is supportive to the Hawkins test in the diagnosis of shoulder impingement syndrome. Adhesive capsulitis is not diagnosed by MRI; the fact that Tump-up and Global ROM test has high sensitivity indicates that MRI support can be provided in cases that are suspicious, however it is far from being diagnostic because of the low specificity figures. With very low figures of sensitivity and specificity, Yergeson and Speed tests have low value in diagnosis. It has been observed that the Lift-off test is a significant tool in m.subscapularis rupture with its high figure of specificity. It has been also observed that m. supraspinatus stress test, m. infraspinatus and m. teres minor stress test are valuable tests with their relatively high specificity and sensitivity. Specificity and sensitivity figures of O'Brein test are deemed to be high in terms of indicating anterior labral defect, which is difficult to diagnose by examination.

Özet

Amaç: Sık kullanılan omuz muayene testleri ile omuz manyetik rezonans görüntüleme (MRG) arasındaki duyarlılık ve özgüllüğün tespit edilmesi.Materyal ve metot: Omuz MRG'si istenmiş 117 hastaya aynı doktor tarafından kör olarak 8 omuz muayene testi yapıldı. Test sonuçları MRG raporları ile karşılaştırıldı. MRG sonuçları ana tanı testi olarak alınarak duyarlılık ve özgüllüğü hesaplandı.Sonuçlar: 1-Hawkins testi % 91, % 85; 2-Tump-up ve Global ROM % 95, % 32; 3-Yergeson testi % 28, % 50; 4-Speed testi % 26, % 59; 5- Lift-off testi % 70, % 99; 6-M.Supraspinatus stres testi % 82, % 92; 7-M.Ünfraspinatus ve M.Teres minör stres testi % 82, % 76; 8-O'Brein testi % 74, % 72 sırasıyla duyarlılığa ve özgüllüğe sahipti.Hawkins testi omuz sıkışma sendromu tanısında yüksek duyarlılık ve özgüllük değerlerine sahiptir. Omuz sıkışma sendromu tanısında MRG Hawkins testine destek olur. Adheziv kapsülitin tanısı MRG ile konulmaz; Tump-up ve Global ROM testinin duyarlılığının yüksek olması şüpheli olgularda MRG'nin desteğinin varolabileceğini, ancak düşük özgüllük değerleri yüzünden tanı koydurucu olmaktan uzak olduğunu göstermektedir. Yergeson ve Speed testleri çok düşük duyarlılık ve düşük özgüllük değerleri ile tanıda değerlerinin azlığını göstermektedirler. Lift-off testi: yüksek özgüllük değeri ile m. subscapularis rüptüründe önemli bir test olduğunu göstermektedir. M. supraspinatus stres testi, M. infraspinatus ve M. teres minör stres testi nispeten yüksek özgüllük ve duyarlılık değerleri ile değerli testler oldukları gözlenmiştir. Tanısı muayene ile zor olan anterior labral defekti göstermesi açısından O'Brein testinin özgüllük ve duyarlılık değerleri yüksek bulunmuştur.

🔖

Cite This Article

DEMİRÇAY, E., ŞENER, N., ÜNAY, K., POYANLI, O., AKAN, K. (2022). Comparing the results of shoulder examination tests and magnetic resonance imaging of the shoulder. Göztepe Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 3, 140–142. https://ajindex.com/articles/526401

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Hawkins RJ, Bokor DJ: Clinical evaluation of shoulder problems. In: Rockwood CA, Matsen FA, editors. The shoulder. 2nd ed.Philadelphia: WB Saun- dersCo; 1998, p.164-199
  2. Woodward TW, Best TM: The Painful Shoulder: Part I. Clinical Evaluation. Am Fam Physician 61(10):3079-88, 2000
  3. Calis M, Akgun K, Birtane M, et al: Diagnostic values of clinical diagnostic tests in subacromial impingement syndrome. Ann Rheum Dis 59(l):44-7, 2000
  4. Gren MR, Christensen KP, editors: Magnetic Resonance Imaging Evalu- ation of the Glenoid Labrum in Anterior Shoulder Instability. Proceedings of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons,1993 Annual Meeting; 1993 Feb 20; New Orleans, LA, USA
  5. Guanche CA, Jones DC: Clinical Testing for Tears of the Glenoid Labrum. Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery. Vol 19, No 5 (May-June) 19(5):517-23, 2003
  6. Birtane M, Çalış M, Akgün K: The diagnostic value of magnetic resonance imaging in subacromial impingement syndrome. Yonsei Med J 42(4):418-24, 2001
  7. Calis M, Akgun K, Birtane M, et al: Diagnostic values of clinical diagnostic tests in subacromial impingement syndrome. Ann Rheum Dis 59(l):44-7, 2000
  8. Leroux JL, Thomas E, Bonnel F, et al: Diagnostic value of clinical tests for shoulder impingement syndrome. Rev Rhum Engl Ed 62(6):423-8, 1995
  9. Woodward TW: The Painful Shoulder: Part I. Clinical Evaluation. American Family Physician 61(10):3079-88, 2000
  10. Mimori K, Muneta T, Nakagawa T, et al: A new pain provocation test for superior labral tears of the shoulder. Am J Sports Med 27(2): 137-42, 1999
  11. Liu SH, Henry MH, Nuccion S, et al: Diagnosis of glenoid labral tears. A comparison between magnetic resonance imaging and clinical examinations. Am J Sports Med 24(2): 149-54, 1996
  12. Iannotti JP, Zlatkin MB, Esterhai JL, et al: Magnetic resonance imaging of the shoulder. Sensitivity, specificity, and predictive value. J Bone Joint Surg 73A(l):17-29, 1991
  13. Iannotti JP, Zlatkin MB, Esterhai JL: Magnetic resonance imaging of the shoulder. Sensitivity, specificity, and predictive value. J Bone Joint Surg 73A(l):17-29, 1991
  14. Cantini F, Salvarini C, Olivieri I: Shoulder Ultrasonography in the Diag nosis of Polymyalgia Rheumatica: A Case-Control Study. J Rheumatol 28:1049-55,2001.