Journals / Göztepe Tıp Dergisi / 2006 / Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 2

The relationship between the respiratory complications during intubation and extubation with the preoperative airway evaluation

Entübasyon ve ekstübasyon sırasında görülebilen solunumsal problemler ve preoperatif hava yolu değerlendirmesi ile ilişkileri

Pages
79–85
Publication Date
2022-10-17
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Statistically the ratio of respiratory complications during induction and extubation for the patients with respiratory problems was significantly higher than the patients with no respiratory problems (p< 0.01).In conclusion, the respiratory complications were seen more frequently during extubation.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this study was to evaluate the respiratory problems of the patients who underwent elective general anaesthesia and compare them with the respiratory complications during induction, extubation and recovery periods of anaesthesia.1144 patients who underwent elective general anaesthesia for surgery were included into this study.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Preoperatively, respiratory problems were present in 11.3 % of the patients. 3.7 % of them were Mallampaty class 3-4.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Statistically the ratio of respiratory complications during induction and extubation for the patients with respiratory problems was significantly higher than the patients with no respiratory problems (p< 0.01).In conclusion, the respiratory complications were seen more frequently during extubation.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the respiratory problems of the patients who underwent elective general anaesthesia and compare them with the respiratory complications during induction, extubation and recovery periods of anaesthesia.1144 patients who underwent elective general anaesthesia for surgery were included into this study. Preoperatively, respiratory problems were present in 11.3 % of the patients. 3.7 % of them were Mallampaty class 3-4. Thyromental distance was shorter than 6/6 cm in 1.8 %. The laryngoscopic state was 3-4 in 4.1 %, difficult intubation in 2.1 % and we used other tecniques to intubate 11.5 % of them. Respiratory complications occured in 3.7 % of the patients during induction; 13.1 % during extubation and 6.8 % in the recovery room. The relationships between laryngoscopic state with Mallompaty class and thyromental distance; and also between using some helpful technics for the intubation and difficult tracheal intubation with Mallompaty state, thyromental distance and laryngoscopic state were significantly higher (p< 0.01). Statistically the ratio of respiratory complications during induction and extubation for the patients with respiratory problems was significantly higher than the patients with no respiratory problems (p< 0.01).In conclusion, the respiratory complications were seen more frequently during extubation. Preoperative airway evaluation make us ready for the respiratory complications during induction, extubation and difficult intubation.

Özet

Çalışmanın amacı, genel anestezi uygulanan olguların preoperatif değerlendirme ile hava yolu problemlerini saptamak ve bu saptanan problemlerin indüksiyon, ekstübasyon ve derlenme döneminde karşılaşılan solunumsal problemler ile karşılaştırmaktır.Genel anestezi ile cerrahi operasyon geçiren toplam 1144 elektif olgu çalışmaya dahil edildi. Preoperatif % 11.3 olguda hava yolu problemi saptandı. Olguların % 3.7'inde Mallampati sınıflaması 3-4, % 1.8'inde tiromental mesafe 6/6 cm'den kısa, % 4.1'inde laringoskopik görüntü derecesi 3-4, % 2.1'-inde zor entübasyon saptandı, bunların % 11.5'inde entübasyona yardımcı teknikler kullanıldı. Olguların % 3.7'sinde indüksiyon sırasında, % 13.1'inde ekstübasyon sırasında ve % 6.8'inde uyanma odasında solunumsal problemler görüldü. Olguların laringoskopik görüntü dereceleri ile Mallampati sınıflamaları ve tiromental mesafe uzunlukları arasında; entübasyonda yardımcı tekniklerin kullanılması ve entübasyonda zorluk ile Mallampati sınıflamaları, tiromental mesafe uzunlukları ve laringoskopik görüntü dereceleri arasında istatistiksel olarak ileri düzeyde anlamlı ilişki bulunmaktadır (p< 0.01). Hava yolu problemi olan olgularda indüksiyon ve ekstübasyonda solunumsal problem görülme oranları, hava yolu problemi olmayan olgulardan istatistiksel olarak ileri düzeyde anlamlı yüksektir (p< 0.01).Sonuç olarak, ekstübasyon sırasında daha sık solunumsal problemlere rastlanılmaktadır. Preoperatif hava yolu değerlendirmesi, indüksiyon ve ekstübasyon sırasında görülebilecek solunumsal problemlere ve zor entübasyona karşı hazırlıklı olmamızı sağlıyabilir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖMÜR, D., ÇELİK, M., YÜZER, S., KOLTKA, N., SAĞIROĞLU, A. E., KAŞIKÇI, T., CAN, T., BABA, H., TURAN, N. (2022). The relationship between the respiratory complications during intubation and extubation with the preoperative airway evaluation. Göztepe Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 2, 79–85. https://ajindex.com/articles/526330

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (17)

  1. El-Ganzouri AR, McCarthy RJ, Tuman KJ, et al: Preoperatif airway assessment: predictive value of a multivariate risk index. Anesth Analg 82:1197-204, 1996
  2. Borg PAJ, Stuart C, Dercksen B, et al: Anaesthetic management of the airway in the Netherlands:a postal survey. Eur J Anesth 18:730- 38,2001
  3. Tse JC, R i nun EB, Hussain A: Predicting difficult endotracheal intubation in surgical patients scheduled for general anesthesia:a prospective blind study. Anesth Analg 81:254-58, 1995
  4. Rosenblatt WH, Wagner PJ, Ovassapian A, et al: Practice patterns in managing the difficult airway by anesthesiologists in the United States. Anesth Analg 87:153-7, 1998
  5. Rose DK, Cohen MM, Wigglesworth DF, efal: Critical respiratory events in the postanesthesia care unit: patient, surgical and anesthetic factors. Anesthesiology 81:410-18, 1994
  6. Çaplan RA, Posner KL, Ward RJ, et al: Adverse respiratory events in anesthesia: a closed claims analysis. Anesthesiology 72:828- 33,1990
  7. Asai T, Koga K, Vaughan RS: Respiratory complications associated with tracheal intubation and extubation. Br J Anaesth 80:767-775, 1998
  8. Lewis M, Keramati S, Benumof JL, et al: What is the best way to determine oropharyngeal classification and mandibular space length to predict difficult laryngoscopy? Anesthesiology 81:69-75, 1994
  9. Savva D: Prediction of difficult tracheal intubation. Br J Anaesth 73:149-153, 1994
  10. Frerk CM: Predicting difficult intubation. Anaesthesia 46:1005- 8,1991
  11. Knill RL: Difficult laryngoscopy made easy with a BURP. Can J Anaesth 40:279-82, 1993
  12. Takahata O, Kubota M, Mamiya K, et al: The efficacy of the BURP maneuver during a difficult laryngoscopy. Anesth Analg 84:419-21,1997
  13. Hartley M, Vaughan RS: Problems associated with tracheal extubation. BrJ Anaesth 71:561-68, 1993
  14. Hines R, Barash PG, Watrous G, et al: Complications occuring in the postanesthesia care unit: a survey. Anesth Analg 74:503-9, 1992
  15. Moller JT, Wittrup M, Johansen SH: Hypoxemia in. the postanesthesia care unit: an observer study. Anesthesiology 73:890-95,1990
  16. Warner DO: Preventing postoperative pulmonary complications: the role of the anesthesiologist. Anesthesiology 92:1467-72, 2000
  17. Parr SM, Robinson BJ, Glover PW, et al: Level of consciousness on arrival in the recovery room and the development of early respiratory morbiditity (Abstract). Anaesth IntCare 19:369-372, 1991.