SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Göztepe Tıp Dergisi / 2010 / Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 2

Intrauterine device in sigmoid colon as an incidental finding

Sigmoid kolonda rahim içi aracın insiidental tespiti

Taner USTA
Uğur ATEŞ
Bilhan SİDAL
Mustafa ACET
Zehra ÖZTÜRK
Pages
91–92
Publication Date
2022-10-17
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Since perforation and migration had occurred without symptoms in ourpatient, we have tried to highlight the importance of periodiccontrols in even asymptomatic patients because of the potential complications of perforation such as sepsis and intestinalobstruction.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Intrautreine device is a contraception method which has beenused for a long period of time with proved efficacy.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this work we report a 38 year old patient with sigmoid perforation of IUD diagnosed as an incidental finding eight years after initial application.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Since perforation and migration had occurred without symptoms in ourpatient, we have tried to highlight the importance of periodiccontrols in even asymptomatic patients because of the potential complications of perforation such as sepsis and intestinalobstruction.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Intrautreine device is a contraception method which has beenused for a long period of time with proved efficacy. Uterineperforation and IUD migration are rare complications of thismethod. Sigmoid colon is a very rare site for perforation witha few case reports. In this work we report a 38 year old patient with sigmoid perforation of IUD diagnosed as an incidental finding eight years after initial application. Since perforation and migration had occurred without symptoms in ourpatient, we have tried to highlight the importance of periodiccontrols in even asymptomatic patients because of the potential complications of perforation such as sepsis and intestinalobstruction.

🔖

Cite This Article

USTA, T., ATEŞ, U., SİDAL, B., ACET, M., ÖZTÜRK, Z. (2022). Intrauterine device in sigmoid colon as an incidental finding. Göztepe Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 2, 91–92. https://ajindex.com/articles/526167

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Caliskan E, Ozturk N, Dilbaz BO, et al. Analysis of risk factors associated with uterine perforation by intrauterine devices. Europ J Cont racept Reprod Heal th Care 2003;8(3):150-155
  2. Zakin D, Stern WZ, Rosenblatt R. Complete and partial uterine perforation and embedding following insertion of intrauterine devices. I: Classification, complications, mechanism, incidence and missing string. Obstet Gynecol Surv 1981;36(7):335-353
  3. Yalcin V, Demirkesen O, Alici B, et al. An unusual presentation of a foreign body in the urinary bladder: a migrant intrauterine device. Urol Int 1998;61(4):240-242
  4. Disu S, Boret A. Asymptomatic ileal perforation of an intrauterine device. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2004;269(3):230-231
  5. Ebel L, Foneron A, Troncoso L, et al. Intrauterine device migration to the bladder: Report of four cases Actas Urol Esp 2008;32(5):530-532
  6. İnceboz US, Ozcakir HT, Uyar Y, et al. Migration of an intrauterine contraceptive device to the sigmoid colon: a case report. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care 2003;8(4):229-232. 7.Sentilhes L, Lefebvre-Lacoeuille C, Poilblanc M. Incidental finding of an intrauterine device in the sigmoid colon Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care 2008;13(2):212-214
  7. Mederos R, Humaran L, Minervini D. Surgical removal of an intrauterine device perforating the sigmoid colon: a case report Int J Surg 2008;6(6):60-62
  8. Istanbulluoglu MO, Ozcimen EE, Ozturk B, et al. Bladder perforation related to intrauterine device J Chin Med Assoc 2008;71(4):207-9
  9. Hoscan MB, Kosar A, Gumustas U, et al. Intravesical migration of intrauterine device resulting in pregnancy. Int J Urol 2006;13:301-2
  10. Guvel S, Tekin MI, Kilinc F, et al. Bladder stones around a migrated and missed intrauterine contraceptive device. Int J Urol 2001;8:78-9
  11. Ozcelik B, Serin IS, Basbug M, et al. Differential diagnosis of intra-uterine device migrating to bladder using radiographic image of calculus formation and review of literature. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2003;108:94-6
  12. Markovitch O, Klein Z, Gidoni Y, et al. Extrauterine mislocated IUD: is surgical removal mandatory? Contraception 2002;66:105-8.