Journals / GORM:Gynecology Obstetrics & Reproductive Medicine / 2021 / Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 3

The Relationship Between First-Trimester Aneuploidy Markers and Birth Weight

Pages
207–212
Publication Date
2022-10-17
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Low maternal serum pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A levels and decreased nuchal translucency measurements were associated with the small for gestational age newborn (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:OBJECTIVE: We aimed to determine the relationship between the first-trimester aneuploidy screeningma and the predicted weight at birth: Small for gestational age and large for gestational age.
📊
Key Findings & Data:STUDY DESIGN: 594 low-risk pregnant women with a singleton pregnancy, who underwent firsttrimester aneuploidy screening by measuring nuchal translucency, maternal serum free beta-human chorionic gonadotropin, and pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A were included in the study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Low maternal serum pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A levels and decreased nuchal translucency measurements were associated with the small for gestational age newborn (p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to determine the relationship between the first-trimester aneuploidy screeningma and the predicted weight at birth: Small for gestational age and large for gestational age. STUDY DESIGN: 594 low-risk pregnant women with a singleton pregnancy, who underwent firsttrimester aneuploidy screening by measuring nuchal translucency, maternal serum free beta-human chorionic gonadotropin, and pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A were included in the study. Those weighing above the 3rd percentile and below the 10th percentile were defined as small for gestational age, and those over the 90th percentile were defined as large for gestational age. RESULTS: A total of 594 pregnant women were enrolled. The mean maternal age of the studied group was 28.8±5.5 years. Low maternal serum pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A levels and decreased nuchal translucency measurements were associated with the small for gestational age newborn (p

🔖

Cite This Article

BIYIK, I., SOYSAL, C., INCE, O., TASCI, Y., KESKIN, N., ERTEN, O., SARI, H. (2022). The Relationship Between First-Trimester Aneuploidy Markers and Birth Weight. GORM:Gynecology Obstetrics & Reproductive Medicine, Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 3, 207–212. https://ajindex.com/articles/525846

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Montanari L, Alfei A, Albonico G, Moratti R, Arossa A, Beneventi F, et al. The impact of first-trimester serum free beta-human chorionic gonadotropin and pregnancy-associated plasma protein A on the diagnosis of fetal growth restriction and small for gestational age infant. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2009;25(1):130-5. Doi: 10.1159/000207554
  2. Plasencia W, González Dávila E, Tetilla V, Padrón Pérez E, García Hernández JA, González González NL. First-trimester screening for large-for-gestational-age infants. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2012;39(4):389-95. Doi:10. 1002/uog.9060
  3. Poon LC, Karagiannis G, Staboulidou I, Shafiei A, Nicolaides KH. Reference range of birth weight with gestation and first-trimester prediction of small-for-gestation neonates. Prenat Diagn. 2011;31(1):58-65. Doi: 10.1002/ pd.2520. 4. de Bie HM, Oostrom KJ, Delemarre-van de Waal HA. Brain development, intelligence and cognitive outcome in children born small for gestational age. Horm Res Paediatr. 2010;73(1):6-14. Doi: 10.1159/000271911
  4. Pallotto EK, Kilbride HW. Perinatal outcome and later implications of intrauterine growth restriction. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2006;49(2):257-69. Doi: 10.1097/00003081- 200606000-00008
  5. Bérard J, Dufour P, Vinatier D, Subtil D, Vanderstichèle S, Monnier JC, et al. Fetal macrosomia: risk factors and outcome. A study of the outcome concerning 100 cases >4500 g. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1998;77(1): 51-9. Doi: 10.1016/s0301-2115(97)00242-x
  6. Walsh JM, McAuliffe FM. Prediction and prevention of the macrosomic fetus. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2012;162(2):125-30. Doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2012.03.005
  7. Canini S, Prefumo F, Pastorino D, Crocetti L, Afflitto CG, Venturini PL, De Biasio P. Association between birth weight and first-trimester free beta-human chorionic gonadotropin and pregnancy-associated plasma protein A. Fertil Steril. 2008;89(1):174-8. Doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert. 2007.02.024
  8. Zhong Y, Tuuli M, Odibo AO. First-trimester assessment of placenta function and the prediction of preeclampsia and intrauterine growth restriction. Prenat Diagn. 2010; 30(4):293-308. Doi: 10.1002/pd.2475
  9. Boucoiran I, Djemli A, Taillefer C, Rypens F, Delvin E, Audibert F. First-trimester prediction of birth weight. Am J Perinatol. 2013;30(8):665-72. Doi: 10.1055/s-0032-133 1023
  10. Hackmon R, Librach C, Burwick R, Rodrigues N, Farine D, Berger H. Do early fetal measurements and nuchal translucency correlate with term birth weight? J Obstet Gynaecol