Journals / GORM:Gynecology Obstetrics & Reproductive Medicine / 2021 / Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 3

Evaluation of the Frequency and Pathological Diagnosis of Vulvar Lesions Is it Associated with Vulvar Pruritus - If So, How Closely?

Pages
273–278
Publication Date
2022-10-17
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In vulvar lesions accompanied by pruritus, making the differential diagnosis according to the severity of pruritus and bringing the possible diagnosis to mind first will speed up the treatment.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:OBJECTIVE: Vulvar lesions are not well known to gynecologists and often cause difficulties in the differential diagnosis.
📊
Key Findings & Data:STUDY DESIGN: The pathological results of the patients who underwent vulvar biopsy between 2015 and 2019 were examined.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In vulvar lesions accompanied by pruritus, making the differential diagnosis according to the severity of pruritus and bringing the possible diagnosis to mind first will speed up the treatment.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2015 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Vulvar lesions are not well known to gynecologists and often cause difficulties in the differential diagnosis. In this study; we aimed to show the frequency of pathologic diagnosis of vulvar lesions and their relationship with vulvar pruritus. STUDY DESIGN: The pathological results of the patients who underwent vulvar biopsy between 2015 and 2019 were examined. The frequency of vulvar lesions was determined and classified under certain headings for gynecologists. The pathological diagnoses were correlated with the severity of pruritus. RESULTS: A total of 220 patients underwent a vulvar biopsy between the dates indicated in the study. The mean age of these patients was 47.9±16.7. The most common concomitant lesion was vulvar pruritus with a rate of 62.7% in cases who were referred to the outpatient clinic and referred for vulvar biopsy. According to biopsy results, the three most common pathological diagnoses were proliferative lesions, infection, and dermatoses. Dermatoses were the most common pathologic diagnosis in patients with severe pruritus. CONCLUSION: Thanks to the clear classification of vulvar lesions for gynecologists; pathological diagnoses will not be overlooked and differential diagnoses will be more effective. In vulvar lesions accompanied by pruritus, making the differential diagnosis according to the severity of pruritus and bringing the possible diagnosis to mind first will speed up the treatment.

🔖

Cite This Article

DEMIR, O., OZALP, M., ARAN, T., OSMANAGAOGLU, M. A. (2022). Evaluation of the Frequency and Pathological Diagnosis of Vulvar Lesions Is it Associated with Vulvar Pruritus - If So, How Closely?. GORM:Gynecology Obstetrics & Reproductive Medicine, Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 3, 273–278. https://ajindex.com/articles/525829

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 93: diagnosis and management of vulvar skin disorders. Obstet Gynecol. 2008; 111(5):1243-53. Reaffirmed 2019. Doi:10.1097/AOG. 0b013e31817578ba
  2. Yeung J, Pauls RN. Anatomy of the vulva and the female sexual response. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2016;43(1):27-44. Doi:10.1016/j.ogc.2015.10.011
  3. Lynch PJ, Moyal-Barracco M, Bogliatto F, Micheletti L, Scurry J. 2006 ISSVD classification of vulvar dermatoses: pathologic subsets and their clinical correlates. J Reprod Med. 2007;52(1):3-9. PMID:17286059
  4. Sand FL, Thomsen SF. Skin diseases of the vulva: eczematous diseases and contact urticaria. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2018;38(3):295-300. Doi:10.1080/01443615.2017.1329283
  5. Sand FL, Thomsen SF. Skin diseases of the vulva: Infectious diseases. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2017;37(7):840-8. Doi:10.1080/01443615.2017.1306696
  6. Hoang MP, Reutter J, Papalas JA, Edwards L, Selim MA. Vulvar inflammatory dermatoses: an update and review. Am J Dermatopathol. 2014;36(9):689-704. Doi:10.1097/ DAD.0000000000000149
  7. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer Statistics, 2017. CA Cancer J Clin. 2017;67(1):7-30. Doi:10.3322/caac. 21387
  8. Schuurman MS, van den Einden LC, Massuger LF, Kiemeney LA, van der Aa MA, de Hullu JA. Trends in incidence and survival of Dutch women with vulvar squamous cell carcinoma. Eur J Cancer. 2013;49(18):3872-80. Doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2013.08.003
  9. Yang EJ, Kong CS, Longacre TA. Vulvar and anal intraepithelial neoplasia: Terminology, diagnosis, and ancillary studies. Adv Anat Pathol. 2017;24(3):136-50. Doi: 10.1097/PAP.0000000000000149
  10. Bleeker MC, Visser PJ, Overbeek LI, van Beurden M, Berkhof J. Lichen Sclerosus: Incidence and risk of vulvar squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2016;25(8):1224-30. Doi:10.1158/1055-9965.EPI16-0019
  11. Thomas RH, Ridley CM, McGibbon DH, Black MM. Anogenital lichen sclerosus in women. J R Soc Med. 1996;89(12):694-8. PMID:9014881
  12. Lewis FM, Velangi SS. An overview of vulvar ulceration. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2005;48(4):824-37. Doi:10.1097/ 01.grf.0000179669.21811.8f
  13. Wilton L, Kollarova M, Heeley E, Shakir S. Relative risk of vaginal candidiasis after use of antibiotics compared with antidepressants in women: postmarketing surveillance data in England. Drug Saf. 2003;26(8):589-97. Doi: 10.2165/00002018-200326080-00005
  14. Donders GG. Lower genital tract infections in diabetic women. Curr Infect Dis Rep. 2002;4(6):536-9. Doi:10. 1007/s11908-002-0042-y. 15. de