Journals / GORM:Gynecology Obstetrics & Reproductive Medicine / 2021 / Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 3

Neonatal Bacterial Meningitis: Single Reference Center Experience and Review of Current Literature: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Pages
289–293
Publication Date
2022-10-17
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Our incidence rates are in keeping with studies from the developed world.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:OBJECTIVE: Despite improvements in neonatal care, neonatal bacterial meningitis is still an emerging problem worldwide with high rates of mortality.
📊
Key Findings & Data:STUDY DESIGN: In this retrospective cohort study newborns admitted to Hacettepe University Ihsan Dogramaci Children’s Hospital Neonatal Intensive Care Unit during a 5-year-period between April 2014- May 2019 and who underwent atraumatic lumbar puncture were included.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Our incidence rates are in keeping with studies from the developed world.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2014 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Despite improvements in neonatal care, neonatal bacterial meningitis is still an emerging problem worldwide with high rates of mortality. The present study evaluates data on suspected- and culture-proven neonatal bacterial meningitis in the light of a single tertiary reference center experience in Turkey in comparison with the globe. STUDY DESIGN: In this retrospective cohort study newborns admitted to Hacettepe University Ihsan Dogramaci Children’s Hospital Neonatal Intensive Care Unit during a 5-year-period between April 2014- May 2019 and who underwent atraumatic lumbar puncture were included. RESULTS: Two hundred sixty-four patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Most common symptoms in all patients raised suspicion in favor of NBM and resulted in lumbar puncture were fever (34.5%, n=91), respiratory distress (31.1%, n=82), lethargy (31.1%, n=82), and apnea (26.1%, n=69). The incidence of culture-proven NBM among suspected patients was 5.7% (n=15/264); while the incidence is 3.1 per 1000 (15/4574) at all Neonatal Intensive Care Unit admissions. Respiratory distress (60.0%, n=9/15) and apnea (40.0%, n=6/15) were the most common symptoms in patients with NBM; which may be due to the predominance of premature newborns in the NBM group. The most common microorganisms in CSF cultures were coagulase-negative Staphylococci with Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis being most common among all. CONCLUSIONS: The present study underlines high rates of culture-proven neonatal bacterial meningitis among suspected newborns despite improvements in modern health care, which raises attention to careful evaluation of these patients and early administration of properly-selected antibiotics. Our incidence rates are in keeping with studies from the developed world.

🔖

Cite This Article

CELIK, H. T., HAZIROLAN, G., YIGIT, S., YURDAKOK, M., AYKANAT, A. (2022). Neonatal Bacterial Meningitis: Single Reference Center Experience and Review of Current Literature: A Retrospective Cohort Study. GORM:Gynecology Obstetrics & Reproductive Medicine, Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 3, 289–293. https://ajindex.com/articles/525819

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Köksal N. Sepsis ve Menenjit. In: Yurdakök M, editor. Yurdakök Pediyatri Kısım 6: Yenidoğan Hastalıkları. Ankara: Güneş Tıp Kitapevleri; 2018. pp. 242-50
  2. Yurdakök M, Yiğit Ş, Çelik HT. Sepsis. In: Yurdakök M, editor. Yenidoğan Bakımında Hacettepe Uygulamaları. Ankara: Güneş Tıp Kitapevleri; 2019. pp. 66-74
  3. Heath PT, Okike IO, Oeser C. Neonatal Meningitis: Can We Do Better? In: Curtis N, Finn A, Pollard A, editors. Hot topics in infection and immunity in children: Advan - ces in Experimental Medicine and Biology. New York: Springer;2012.pp.11-24
  4. Heath PT, Okike IO. Neonatal bacterial meningitis: an update. Symposium: Infection (and Immunity). 2010;20 (11):526-30
  5. Gaschignard J, Levy C, Romain O, Cohen R, Bingen E, Aujard Y, et al. Neonatal bacterial meningitis: 444 cases in 7 years. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2011;30(3):212-7. Doi: 10.1097/inf.0b013e3181fab1e7
  6. Furyk JS, Swann O, Molyneux E. Systematic review: neonatal meningitis in the developing world. Trop Med Int Health. 2011;16(6):672-9. Doi:10.1111/j.1365-3156. 2011.02750.x
  7. Thaver D, Zaidi AKM. Burden of neonatal infections in developing countries: a review of evidence from community-based studies. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2009;28(1 Suppl): S3-9. Doi:10.1097/INF.0b013e3181958755
  8. Stoll BJ, Hansen NI, Sánchez PJ, Faix RG, Poindexter BB, Van Meurs KP, et al. Early onset neonatal sepsis: the burden of group B Streptococcal and E. coli disease continues. Pediatrics. 2011;127(5):817-26. Doi:10.1542/ peds.2010-2217
  9. Stoll BJ, Hansen N, Fanaroff AA, Wright LL, Carlo WA, Ehrenkranz RA, et al. Late-Onset Sepsis in Very Low Birth Weight Neonates: The Experience of the NICHD Neonatal Research Network. Pediatrics. 2002;110(2 Pt 1):285-91. Doi:10.1542/peds.110.2.285
  10. Satar M, Arısoy AE, Çelik İH. Turkish Neonatal Society guideline on neonatal infections diagnosis and treatment. Turk Pediatri Ars. 2018;53(Suppl 1):S88-S100. Doi: 10.5152/TurkPediatriArs.2018.01809
  11. Kavuncuoğlu S, Gürsoy S, Türel Ö, Aldemir EY, Hoşaf E. Neonatal bacterial meningitis in Turkey: epidemiology, risk factors, and prognosis. J Infect Dev Ctries. 2013;7 (2):73-81. Doi:10.3855/jidc.2652
  12. El-Naggar W, Afifi J, McMillan D, Toye J, Ting J, Yoon EW, et al. Epidemiology of meningitis in Canadian neonatal intensive care units. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2019;38(5): 476-80. Doi:10.1097/INF. 0000000000002247
  13. Ku LC, Boggess KA, Cohen-Wolkowiez M. Bacterial meningitis in the infant. Clin Perinatol. 2015;42(1):29-45,