Journals / Gıda / 2011 / Cilt: 36 - Sayı: 4

Konveksiyonal kurutmada domates dilimlerinin kurutma karakteristikleri ve efektif nem yayılım değeri

Effective moisture diffusivity and drying characteristics of tomato slices during convectional drying

Journal
Gıda
Pages
201–208
Publication Date
2022-10-17
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The activation energy was found as 24.92 kJ/ mole.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The drying characteristics of the tomato slices were investigated at 65, 70, 75 and 80 °C.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The tomato samples were dried up to 2-3 % wet basis (w.b).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The activation energy was found as 24.92 kJ/ mole.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The drying characteristics of the tomato slices were investigated at 65, 70, 75 and 80 °C. The tomato samples were dried up to 2-3 % wet basis (w.b). The experimental data of the tomato samples were fitted to the six models; Page’s, Henderson & Pabis, Logaritmic, Wang & Sing, Midilli and Polynommial model. SSE, R2 and RMSE % values were used to determine the suitability of these models for describing the drying curves of tomato slices. Polynommial model gave better results compared to others. Effective moisture diffusivity values (Deff) were found between 5.86.10-9 and 2.505.10-8 m2/s for tomato slices and increasing drying temperature causes an increase in Deff values. The activation energy was found as 24.92 kJ/ mole.

Özet

Bu çalışmada, domates dilimlerinin 65, 70, 75 ve 80 °C’deki kurutma karakteristikleri araştırmılmıştır. Domates numuneleri % 2-3 nem içeri¤ine kadar kurutulmuştur. Domates numunelerinin kurutma verileri, Page, Henderson & Pabis, Logaritmik, Wang & Sing, Midilli ve Polinom modelleri kullanılarak verilerin modellere uygunluğu denenmifltir. Domates dilimlerinin kurutma eğrilerinin modellere uygunluğunun belirlenmesinde SSE, R2 ve % RMSE de¤erleri kullanılmıştır. Polinom modelinin matematiksel eflitlikler içerisinde en uygun model olduğu belirlenmiştir. Domates dilimlerinin efektif nem yayılım değerlerinin (Deff) 5.86.10-9– 2.505.10-8 m2/s arasında değiştigi ve artan kurutma sıcaklıgının Deff değerlerinde artışa neden olduğu belirlenmiştir. Domates dilimlerinin aktivasyon enerjileri 24.92 kJ/ mol olarak bulunmuştur.

🔖

Cite This Article

GAMLI, F. Ö. (2022). Konveksiyonal kurutmada domates dilimlerinin kurutma karakteristikleri ve efektif nem yayılım değeri. Gıda, Cilt: 36 - Sayı: 4, 201–208. https://ajindex.com/articles/525382

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. FAO 2005. FaoStat Database. http:// faostat. fao.org. Guil-Guerrero JL, Rebolloso-Fuentes MM. 2009. Nutrient composition and antioxidant activity of eight tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) varieties. J Food Compos Anal, 22, 123-129
  2. Abjdayil B, Banat F, Jumah R, Al-Asheh S, Hammad SAC. 2004. Comparative study of rheological characteristics of tomato paste and tomato powder solutions. Int J Food Prop, 7 (3), 483-497.
  3. Akanbi CT, Oludemi FO. 2004. Effect of processing and packaging on the lycopene content of tomato products. Int J Food Prop, 7 (1):139-152. Cemeroglu B. 2004. Fruit and Vegetable Processing Thecnology. 2nd Edition.
  4. Food Technology Publishing, Ankara, 408- 409. Masters K. 1985. Spray Drying Handbook. 4th Edition.
  5. John Wiley and Sons, New York. Doymaz I. 2007. Air-drying characteristics of tomatoes. J Food Eng, 78, 1291-1297.
  6. St. George SD, Cenkowski S, Muir WE. 2004. A rewiev of drying technologies for the preservation of nutritional compounds in waxy skinned fruit. North Central ASAE/CSAE Conference, Manitoba- Canada, 24-25.
  7. Zanoni B, Peri C, Nani R, Lavelli V. 1999. Oxidative heat damage of tomato halves as affected by drying. Food Res Int, 31, 395-401.
  8. Gaware TJ, Sutar N, Throat BN. 2010. Drying of tomato using different methods: comparison of dehydration and rehydration kinetics. Drying Technol, 28, 651-658.
  9. Doymaz I, Akgun NA. 2009. Study of thin-layer drying of grape wastes. Chem Eng Commun, 196 (890), 890-900.
  10. Doymaz I, Gorel O, Akgün NA. 2004. Drying characteristics of the solid by-product of olive oil extraction. Biosystem Eng, 88, 213-219.
  11. Wang CY, Singh RP. 1978. A single layer drying equation for rough rice. ASAE paper n. 3001 Midilli A, Kucut H, Yapar Z. 2002. A new model for single layer drying. Drying Technol, 7, 1503-1513.
  12. Vega-Galvez A, Miranda M, Diaz LP, Lopez L, Rodriguez K, Di Scala K. 2010. Effective moisture diffusivity determination and mathematical modelling of the drying curves of the olive-waste cake. Bioresour Technol, 101:7265-7270.
  13. Yagcioglu A, Degirmencioglu A, Cagatay F. 1999. Drying characteristic of laurel leaves under different conditions. Proceeding of the 7th international congress on agricultural mechanization and energy. Faculty of Agriculture Cukurova University, Adana, 565-569.
  14. Touil A, Chemkhi S, Zageouba F. 2010. Modelling of the drying kinetics of Opuntia ficus indica fruits and cladodes. Int J Food Eng, 6 (2): 1-15.
  15. Phanpanich M, Mani S. 2009. Drying characteristics of pine forest residues. Bioresour Te