Journals / Gıda / 2013 / Cilt: 38 - Sayı: 5

KONSERVE FÜME MEZGİT HAVYARI EZMESİNİN DUYUSAL, KİMYASAL ve MİKROBİYOLOJİK ÖZELLİKLERİ

SENSORY, CHEMICAL and MICROBIOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS of CANNED-SMOKED WHITING ROE PATE

Journal
Gıda
Pages
259–266
Publication Date
2022-10-17
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

When all of the quality properties were taken into account, it was seen that the canned-smoked whiting roe pate might be offered for consumption as an alternative product and it might provide added value to food sector.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study was carried out to determine sensory, chemical and microbiological quality of raw whiting (Gadus merlangus euxinus Nordman, 1840) roe obtained from Middle Black Sea, smoked roes and the roe which were canned after smoked.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Moisture, protein, fat, ash, carbohydrate contents and calorie value of raw roe were 80.88%, 11.70%, 4.50%, 1.09%, 1.82% and 94.62 kcal, respectively.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:When all of the quality properties were taken into account, it was seen that the canned-smoked whiting roe pate might be offered for consumption as an alternative product and it might provide added value to food sector.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This study was carried out to determine sensory, chemical and microbiological quality of raw whiting (Gadus merlangus euxinus Nordman, 1840) roe obtained from Middle Black Sea, smoked roes and the roe which were canned after smoked. Analyses of TVB-N, TBA, pH, total mesophilic aerobic bacteria, total psychrophilic aerobic bacteria, total yeast-mold, total coliform bacteria and also the sensory analyses were done on the roe samples. Additionally, proximate composition values were obtained in both raw material and canned-smoked product. Moisture, protein, fat, ash, carbohydrate contents and calorie value of raw roe were 80.88%, 11.70%, 4.50%, 1.09%, 1.82% and 94.62 kcal, respectively. These values were determined as 61.34%, 8.64%, 12.52%, 1.12%, 16.37% and 212.74 kcal for the canned-smoked roe pate. In the chemical analysis findings, TVB-N and TBA values stayed within the acceptability limit values. It was observed in the microbiological analysis results that, microbial load of the raw material decreased with smoking process. No microbial load was found after the canning process. When all of the quality properties were taken into account, it was seen that the canned-smoked whiting roe pate might be offered for consumption as an alternative product and it might provide added value to food sector.

Özet

Bu çalışma Orta Karadenizde avlanan mezgit balığından elde edilen çiğ havyar, füme havyar ve tütsülendikten sonra konservesi yapılan havyarın duyusal, kimyasal ve mikrobiyolojik kalitelerini belirlemek amacıyla yürütülmüştür. Havyar örneklerine TVB-N, TBA, pH, toplam mezofilik aerobik ve psikrofilik aerobik bakteri, toplam maya-küf, toplam koliform bakteri analizleri ile duyusal analizler uygulanmıştır. Ayrıca ham materyal ile son üründe besin kompozisyonu değerleri elde edilmiştir. Çiğ havyarın nem, protein, yağ, kül, karbonhidrat içeriği ve kalori değeri sırası ile %80.88, %11.70, %4.50, %1.09, %1.82 ve 94.62 kcaldir. Bu değerler konserve füme havyar ezmesi için sırasıyla %61.34, %8.64, %12.52, %1.12, %16.37 ve 212.74 kcal olarak belirlenmiştir. Kimyasal analiz bulgularında TVB-N ve TBA değerleri tüketilebilirlik sınır değerleri arasında kalmıştır. Mikrobiyolojik analiz sonuçlarında çiğ örnekteki mikrobiyal yükün dumanlama işlemi ile azaldığı gözlenmiştir. Konservasyon işleminden sonra ise mikrobiyal yüke rastlanmamıştır. Tüm kalite değişimleri dikkate alındığında konserve füme mezgit havyarı ezmesinin alternatif bir ürün olarak tüketime sunulabileceği ve gıda sektörüne katma değer sağlayabileceği görülmüştür.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇORAPCI, B., KABA, N., ERYAŞAR, K., KARABEK, H. N. (2022). KONSERVE FÜME MEZGİT HAVYARI EZMESİNİN DUYUSAL, KİMYASAL ve MİKROBİYOLOJİK ÖZELLİKLERİ. Gıda, Cilt: 38 - Sayı: 5, 259–266. https://ajindex.com/articles/525344

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (17)

  1. TUIK 2010. Turkish Statistical Institute. Fisheries Statistics. No: 122
  2. Samsun S, Erdem E, Samsun N. 2006. The determination of meat yield and chemical composition of whiting (Gadus merlangus). Firat Univ J Sci Eng, 18 (2):165-170
  3. Elliatt M. 1996. Turkish Domestic and Foreign Markets for Fisheries Products with the Existing Work on the Possibilities of the Future Market. Republic of Turkey Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affair. General Directorate for Agricultural Production and Development, Ankara
  4. Himelbloom BH, Crapo CA. 1998. Microbial Evaluation of Alaska Salmon Caviar. J Food Protec. 61(5): 626-628
  5. Gulyavuz H, Unlusayin M. 1999. Fishing and Processing Technology. Suleyman Demirel University, Egirdir Fishery Faculty, Sahin Press. Isparta. p.366
  6. Vural H, Oztan A. 1996. Practical Guide to Quality Control Laboratory of Meat Products. Hacettepe University Faculty of Engineering Publications. Ankara Pub. No: 36, 35-118
  7. Atasoy E, Erdem U, Cebeci M, Yerli B. 2006. Some Biological Characteristics of the Whiting (Merlangius merlangus) in the Marmara Sea. E.U. J Fisheries and Aquatic Sci, 23 (1/1):33-37
  8. Karakas Y. 2008. Caviar Production from Grey Mullet and Determination of Quality. PhD. Thesis. Suleyman Demirel University Science Institute, Isparta. Turkey. p 30
  9. Inanli AG, Coban OE. Dartay M. 2010. The Chemical and Sensorial Changes in Rainbow Trout Caviar Salted in Different Ratios During Storage. Fish sci, 76:879–883
  10. AOAC 1995. Official Methods of Analysis (16th ed.). Washington, DC: Association of Official Analytical Chemistry
  11. Bligh EG, Dyer WJ. 1959. A Rapid Method for Total Lipid Extraction and Purification. Can J Biochem Physiol, 37: 911-917
  12. Falch E, Overrien I, Solberg C, Slizyte R. 2010. Composition and calories. In: Seafood and Seafood Product Analysis, Part III. Nollet, L. M. L., and Toldrá, F. (Eds.). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, Taylor & Francies Group, pp. 257–288
  13. Varlik C, Ugur M, Gokoglu N, Gun H. 1993. Principles and Methods of Quality Control in Aquaculture. Food Technology Association, Paper no: 17. Ankara. p. 174
  14. Inal T. 1992. Food Hygiene of Foodstuffs of Animal Health Control
  15. Press. Final ofset I.C. Istanbul, p 783
  16. Erkan N, Ozden O. 2008. Quality Assessment of Whole and Gutted Sardine (Sardine pilchardus) Stored in Ice. Int J Food Sci Technol, 42:1297–1304
  17. Vural H, Oztan A. 1996. Practical Guide to Quality Control Laboratory of Meat Products. Hacettepe University Fa