Journals / Gıda / 2013 / Cilt: 38 - Sayı: 3

Türkiye’nin farklı coğrafik bölgelerinden toplanan propolis örneklerinin Aspergillus versicolor ve Penicillium aurantiogriseum’e karşı antifungal aktiviteleri

Antifungal activity of propolis samples collected from different geographical regions of Turkey against two food-related molds, Aspergillus versicolor and Penicillium aurantiogriseum

Journal
Gıda
Pages
135–142
Publication Date
2022-10-17
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results indicated that a higher EEP concentration was necessary for the inhibitory effect on mycelial growth of P. auantiogriseum comparing with A. versicolor.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this study was to investigate antifungal activities of 10 propolis samples collected from various geographical regions of Turkey against 2 important food-related mycotoxin producer molds, Aspergillus versicolor and Penicillium aurantiogriseum.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Antifungal activities of EEP samples were tested at 3 different concentrations of 1%, 5% and 10% (v/v) by determination percentage of mycelial growth inhibition of the mold strains on Potato Dextrose Agar.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results indicated that a higher EEP concentration was necessary for the inhibitory effect on mycelial growth of P. auantiogriseum comparing with A. versicolor.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate antifungal activities of 10 propolis samples collected from various geographical regions of Turkey against 2 important food-related mycotoxin producer molds, Aspergillus versicolor and Penicillium aurantiogriseum. Chemical compositions of ethyl alcohol extracts of the propolis (EEP) samples were determined by gas chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry. Antifungal activities of EEP samples were tested at 3 different concentrations of 1%, 5% and 10% (v/v) by determination percentage of mycelial growth inhibition of the mold strains on Potato Dextrose Agar. Main organic components of EEP samples were flavonoids, aromatic alcohols, aromatic acid esters, aliphatic acid esters, aromatic acids, alcohols and aromatic hydrocarbons. All EEP samples at 10% concentration showed 100% inhibition on mycelial growth of both mold strains. Antifungal activities of EEP samples against the mold strains were variable at 1% and 5% concentrations. The results indicated that a higher EEP concentration was necessary for the inhibitory effect on mycelial growth of P. auantiogriseum comparing with A. versicolor. Percentage of flavonoids in the effective propolis samples was considerably higher than the others. These results indicated that propolis samples had a marked antifungal action against both mold strains depending on EEP concentration and chemical composition.

Özet

Bu çalıflmanın amacı, Türkiye’nin çeflitli coğrafik bölgelerinden toplanan 10 propolis örneğinin mikotoksin üreticisi olan, gıda kaynaklı iki küf (Aspergillus versicolor ve Penicillium aurantiogriseum) sufluna karflı antifungal aktivitelerini arafltırmaktır. Propolis örneklerinin etil alkol ekstraktlarının (EEP) kimyasal kompozisyonları kütle spektorometresine birlefltirilmifl gaz kromatografisi ile belirlenmifltir. EEP örneklerinin antifungal aktiviteleri %1, %5 ve %10 olacak flekilde üç farklı konsantrasyonda test edilmifltir. EEP örneklerinin antifungal aktiviteleri, incelenen küf suflunun Patates Dekstroz Agar besiyeri yüzeyindeki misel gelifliminde meydana gelen inhibisyonun yüzdesi fleklinde belirlenmifltir. EEP örneklerinin ana bileflenleri flavonoitler, aromatik alkoller, aromatik asit esterler, alifatik asit esterler, aromatik asitler, alkoller ve aromatik hidrokarbonlar olarak tespit edilmifltir. EEP örneklerinin tümü %10 konsantrasyonda her iki küf suflunun misel geliflimi üzerinde %100 inhibisyon sağlamıfltır. EEP örneklerinin iki küf suflu üzerindeki antifungal etkisi %1 ve %5 konsantrasyonlarında değiflkenlik göstermifltir. Arafltırma sonuçları, P. aurantiogriseum suflunun misel geliflimi üzerinde inhibisyon etkisi yaratması için A. versicolor’a kıyasla daha yüksek bir EEP konsantrasyonuna gereksinim olduğuna iflaret etmektedir. Küf suflları üzerinde etkin olan propolis örneklerinin flavonoit yüzdesi diğer bileflenlerin yüzdesinden oldukça daha yüksektir. Bu sonuçlar, propolis örneklerinin EEP konsantrasyonuna ve kimyasal kompozisyonuna bağlı olarak iki küf suflu üzerinde de belirgin kuvvette bir antifungal etki yarattığına iflaret etmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

MUMCU, A. Ş., SALİH, B., TÜYLÜ, A. Ö., SORKUN, K., TEMİZ, A. (2022). Türkiye’nin farklı coğrafik bölgelerinden toplanan propolis örneklerinin Aspergillus versicolor ve Penicillium aurantiogriseum’e karşı antifungal aktiviteleri. Gıda, Cilt: 38 - Sayı: 3, 135–142. https://ajindex.com/articles/525338

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Sweeney MJ, Dobson ADW. 1998.
  2. Mycotoxin production by Aspergillus, Fusarium and Penicillium species. Int J Food Microbiol, 43: 141-158. Fleet G. 1992. Spoilage yeasts. Crit Rev Biotechnol, 12: 1-14.
  3. Fuglsang C, Johnson G, Christgau S. 1995. Antimicrobial enzymes: Applications and future potential in food industry. Trends Food Sci Technol, 6 (2): 390-399.
  4. Brul E, Coote P. 1997. Novel antifungal strategies of potential use to the food industry. Food Chem Toxicol, 35 (4): 720-726.
  5. Varanda E, Monti R, Tavares DC. 1999. Inhibitory effect of propolis and bee venom on the mutagenicity of some direct- and indirect-acting mutagens. J Carcinog, 19 (4): 403-419. Ghisalberti EL. 1979. Propolis: A Review. Bee World, 60: 59-84. Crane E. 1990. Bees and Beekeeping: Science, Practice and World Resources. Cornstock Publishing, Ithaca, NY., USA, 614 p. Sorkun K, Suer B, Salih B. 2001. Determination of chemical composition of Turkish propolis. Z Naturforsch, 56: 666-668.
  6. Greenaway W, Scaybrook T, Whatley FR. 1990. The composition and plant origin of propolis. Mycologia, 72 (2): 107-118. Burdock GA. 1998. Review of the biological properties and toxicity of bee propolis (propolis). Food Chem Toxicol, 36: 347-363.
  7. Cafarchia C, De Laurentis N, Milillo MA, Losacco V, Puccini V. 1999. Antifungal activity of Apulia region propolis. Parassitologia, 4 (12): 5870-5880. Wohrl S. 2003. Patch testing in children, adults, and the elderly: influence of propolis on age and sex. J Dermatol, 46 (2): 119-123., 18 (1): 6-9.
  8. Tan-No K, Nakajima T, Shoji T, Nakagawasai O, Niijima F, Ishikawa M, Endo Y, Sato T, Satoh S, Tadano T. 2006. Anti-inflammatory effect of propolis through inhibition of nitric oxide production on carrageenin-induced mouse paw edema. Biol Pharm Bull, 29 (1): 96-99. Lindenfelser LA. 1967. Antimicrobial activity of propolis. Am Bee J, 107 (3): 90-92, 130-131.
  9. Grange JM, Davey RW. 1990. Antibacterial properties of propolis (bee glue). J Roy Soc Med, 83: 159-160.
  10. Dobrowolski JW, Vohora SB, Sharma K, Shah SA, Naqvi SAH, Dandiya PC. 1991. Antibacterial, antifungal,antiamoebic, anti inflammatory and antipyretic studies on propolis bee products. J Ethnopharmacol, 35: 77-82.
  11. Kujumgiev A, Bankova V, Ignatova A, Popov S. 1993. Antibacterial activity of propolis, some of its components and their analogs. Pharmazie, 48: 785-786. Marcucci MC. 1995. Propolis: chemical composition, biological properties and therapeutic activity. Apidologie, 26: 83–99.
  12. Kujumgiev A, Tsvetkova I, Serkedjieva Y,