SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Genel Tıp Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 3

New Generation Mobile Phone Frequencies and Biological Effects

Yeni Nesil Cep Telefonu Frekansları ve Biyolojik Etkileri

Yusuf Küçükbağrıaçık
Elçin Özgür Büyükatalay
Pages
309–312
Publication Date
2022-10-17
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In this review, scientific publications on the health effects of previous generations and new generation mobile phone technologies were examined.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:There is no definitive information about the health and biological effects of wireless technologies that surround us with an increasing amount every day.
📊
Key Findings & Data:These technologies, which work with electromagnetic fields in the 3 kHz - 300 GHz frequency band covering Radio Frequency (RF) and microwave (MW) fields, have been in existence for nearly 40 years.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this review, scientific publications on the health effects of previous generations and new generation mobile phone technologies were examined.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Radyo frekansı · Cep telefonu · COVID-19

Abstract

There is no definitive information about the health and biological effects of wireless technologies that surround us with an increasing amount every day. These technologies, which work with electromagnetic fields in the 3 kHz - 300 GHz frequency band covering Radio Frequency (RF) and microwave (MW) fields, have been in existence for nearly 40 years. It is seen that the technologies used today use higher frequency and energy compared to the first generation (G) technologies. In the new generation 5G and 6G technologies, higher frequency and energy millimeter waves (MMW) and terahertz frequency waves will be used. Benefiting from the increasing speed of information sharing with the development of these technologies, some groups have blamed mobilephone and base station radiation exposure in the spread of the Corona virüs (COVID-19) pandemic, the most important health problem of recent days. In this review, scientific publications on the health effects of previous generations and new generation mobile phone technologies were examined.

Özet

Her geçen gün artan miktarda etrafımızı saran kablosuz teknolojilerin sağlık ve biyolojik etkileri ile ilgili henüz kesin bir bilgi bulunmamaktadır. Radyo Frekans (RF) ve mikrodalga (MW) alanları kapsayan 3 kHz - 300 GHz frekans bandında yer alan elektromanyetik alanlar ile çalışan bu teknolojiler 40 yıla yakın süredir varlığını sürdürmektedir. Günümüzde kullanılan teknolojilerde Birinci nesil (G) teknolojilerine kıyasla daha yüksek frekans ve enerji kullandığı görülmektedir. Yeni nesil 5G ve 6G teknolojilerinde daha yüksek frekanslı ve enerjili milimetre dalgalar (MMW) ve terahertz frekanslı dalgalar kullanılacaktır. Bu teknolojilerin gelişimiyle artan bilgi paylaşım hızından yararlanan bazı gruplar, son günlerin en önemli sağlık problemi olan Korona virüs (COVID-19) pandemisinin yayılmasında cep telefonu ve baz istasyonu radyasyonu maruziyetini sorumlu tutmuştur. Bu derlemede önceki nesiller ve yeni nesil cep telefonu teknolojilerinin sağlık etkilerine ilişkin bilimsel yayınlar incelemiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Küçükbağrıaçık, Y., Büyükatalay, E. Ö. (2022). New Generation Mobile Phone Frequencies and Biological Effects. Genel Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 3, 309–312. https://ajindex.com/articles/524631

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Guidelines for limiting exposure to time-varying electric, magnetic, and electromagnetic fields (up to 300 GHz). International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection. Health Phys 1998;74(4):494-522. Li D. 5G and intelligence medicine-how the next generation of wireless technology will reconstruct healthcare? Precision clinical medicine. 2019;2(4):205-208. Exposure to high frequency electromagnetic fields, biological effects and health consequences (100 kHz to 300 GHz). Germany: ICNIRP; International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection; 2009a.
  2. Morgan LL, Miller AB, Sasco A, Davis DL. Mobile phone radiation causes brain tumors and should be classified as a probable human carcinogen (2A) (Review). International Journal of Oncology 2015;46(5):1865-1871.
  3. Sahin D, Ozgur E, Guler G, et al. The 2100MHz radiofrequency radiation of a 3G-mobile phone and the DNA oxidative damage in brain. Journal of Chemical Neuroanatomy 2016;75:94-98.
  4. Esmekaya MA, Aytekin E, Ozgur E, et al. Mutagenic and morphologic impacts of 1.8GHz radiofrequency radiation on human peripheral blood lymphocytes (hPBLs) and possible protective role of pre-treatment with Ginkgo biloba (EGb 761). Science of The Total Environment 2011;410-411:59-64.
  5. Jiang D-P, Li J-h, Zhang J, et al. Long-term electromagnetic pulse exposure induces Abeta deposition and cognitive dysfunction through oxidative stress and overexpression of APP and BACE1. Brain Research 2016;1642:10-19.
  6. Kim JH, Yu D-H, Huh YH, et al. Long-term exposure to 835 MHz RF-EMF induces hyperactivity, autophagy and demyelination in the cortical neurons of mice. Scientific Reports 2017;7(1):41129. Altun G, Deniz ÖG, Yurt KK, Davis D, Kaplan S. Effects of mobile phone exposure on metabolomics in the male and female reproductive systems. Environ Res 2018;167:700-707.
  7. Falzone N, Huyser C, Becker P, Leszczynski D, Franken DR. The effect of pulsed 900-MHz GSM mobile phone radiation on the acrosome reaction, head morphometry and zona binding of human spermatozoa. Int J Androl 2011;34(1):20-26.
  8. Kazemi E, Mortazavi SM, Ali-Ghanbari A, et al. Effect of 900 MHz Electromagnetic Radiation on the Induction of ROS in Human Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells. J Biomed Phys Eng 2015;5(3):105-114.
  9. Ohtani S, Ushiyama A, Maeda M, et al. The effects of radio-frequency electromagnetic fields on T cell function during development. J Radiat Res 2015;56(3):467-474.
  10. Gruber MJ, Palmquist E, Nordin S. Characteristics of perceived electromagnetic hypersens