SavedAdd your journal

Journals / İSTEM / 2026 / Sayı: 22

New Findings about the Mūsā b. Uqba's Kitāb al-Maghāzī

MÛSÂ b. UKBE'NİN KİTÂBÜ'L-MEĞÂZÎ'Sİ İle İLGİLİ YENİ BULGULAR

Gregor Schoeler(KAHRAMANMARAŞ SÜTÇÜ İMAM ÜNİVERSİTESİ, İLAHİYAT FAKÜLTESİ)
Hüseyin Akgün
Journal
İSTEM
Pages
1–11
Publication Date
2013-12-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Uqba and put forward a new hypothesis about the origins of anonymous news

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, Groger Shoeler put in some important new findings to the article, in line with the old ones, which he had previously written about the Kitāb alMaghāzī of Mūsā b.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Shoeler tried to prove that Ibn Ishaq had used the Maghāzī of Mūsā b.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Uqba and put forward a new hypothesis about the origins of anonymous news
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Mûsâ b. Ukbe · Kitâbü‘l-Meğâzî · İbn İshak

Abstract

In this study, Groger Shoeler put in some important new findings to the article, in line with the old ones, which he had previously written about the Kitāb alMaghāzī of Mūsā b. Uqba. Shoeler tried to prove that Ibn Ishaq had used the Maghāzī of Mūsā b. Uqba as the source for that of himself without referring to him. In addition to that, he tackled with issue of the sources of Mūsā b. Uqba and put forward a new hypothesis about the origins of anonymous news

Özet

Gregor Schoeler bu çalışmasında, daha önce Musa b. Ukbe‘nin Kitâbü‟lmeğâzîsi hakkında yazmış olduğu makalesindeki tespitlerine, yeni bulguları doğrultusunda önemli bazı ilavelerde bulunmuştur. Schoeler, İbn İshak‘ın isim vermeden Musa b. Ukbe‘nin Meğâzî‘sini kendi Meğâzî‘si için kaynak olarak kullandığını ispatlamaya çalışmıştır. Ayrıca o, Musa b. Ukbe‘nin kaynakları konusunu da ele almakta ve anonim haberlerin kökeni hususunda ortaya yeni bir hipotez atmaktadır

🔖

Cite This Article

Schoeler, G., Akgün, H. (2013). New Findings about the Mūsā b. Uqba's Kitāb al-Maghāzī. İSTEM, Sayı: 22, 1–11. https://ajindex.com/articles/52393

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (47)

  1. Birincil Literatür
  2. Mûsâ b. Ukbe‟nin Rivâyetlerinden Derlemeler ve Seçkiler a)
  3. » Mûsâ b. Ukbe, el-Meğâzî, thk. M. Bakşîş Ebû Mâlik, Agâdir: Câmiatü İbn Zühr/Külliyetü‘l- âdâb, 1994.
  4. » Sachau, Eduard, ―Das Berliner Fragment des Mūsā b. Uqba‖, SB Preussiche Akademie der Wissenschaften, Berlin, 1904, s. 445-70. Diğer Kaynaklar b)
  5. » Abdürrezzâk b. Hemmâm es-San‘ânî, el-Musannef, thk. H. el-A‘zamî, I-X, Beyrut: Meclisü‘l- ————
  6. Görke ve Schoeler, Die ältesten Berichte, s. 121-22, 142 vd., 183-84.
  7. İbn Hişâm, Sîre, I, 235. Bkz. Schoeler, Charakter und Authentie, s. 90 vd., 108-09.
  8. Beyhakî, Delâil, III, 109; Görke ve Schoeler, Die ältesten Berichte, s. 87.
  9. Görke ve Schoeler, Die ältesten Berichte, s. 278-79. ilmî, 1970-72.
  10. » el-Beyhakî, Ebû Bekir Ahmed b. Hüseyin, Delâilü‟n-nübüvve ve ma‟rifeti ahvâli sâhibi‟ş- şerîa, thk. A. Kal‘acî, I-VII, Beyrut: Dârü‘l-kütübi‘l-ilmiyye, 1985.
  11. » el-Buhârî, Ebû Abdullah Muhammed b. İsmail, es-Sahîh, thk. M. Dîb el-Buga, I-VI, Beyrut: Dâru İbn Kesîr, 1990.
  12. » İbn Hacer el-Askalânî, Şihabüddin Ahmed b. Ali, Fethü‟l-bârî fî şerhi Sahîhi‟l-Buhârî, thk. T. A. Sa‘d ve M. M. El-Havârî, Mukaddime + I-XXVIII, Kahire: Mektebetü‘l-külliyeti‘l-Ezheriyye, 1978.
  13. » İbn Hişâm, es-Sîretü‟n-nebeviyye, thk. M. el-Sakâ vd., I-II (1-4), Kahire: Mektebetü bâbi‘l- Halebî, 1955.
  14. » İbn İshâk, bk. İbn Hişâm.
  15. » İbn Sa‘d, Muhammed, Kitabü‟l-tabakâti‟l-kebîr: Biographien Muhammeds, seiner Gefährten und der späteren Träger des Islams bis zum Jahre 230, haz. E. Sachau, C. Brockelmann vd., I-IX, Leiden: Brill, 1905-1940.
  16. » et-Taberî, Muhammed b. Cerîr, Târîhu‟rusul ve‟l-mulûk (Annales), haz. M. J. de Goeje vd., I- III, Leiden: Brill, 1879-1901.
  17. » el-Vâkıdî, Ebû Abdullah Muhammed b. Ömer, Kitâbü‟l-Meğâzî, haz. M. Jones, I-III, Londra: Oxford University Press, 1966.
  18. » ez-Zehebî, Muhammed b. Ahmed, Siyeru a‟lâmi‟n-nübelâ, Şuayb el-Arnaût vd., Beyrut: Mü- essesetü‘r-risâle, 1985.
  19. » ……., Târîhu‟l-İslâm ve vefeyâti‟l-meşâhîri ve‟l-a‟lâm: I. cilt: es-Sîretü‘n-nebeviyye- II. cilt: el- Meğâzî, thk. U. A. Tadmurî, Beyrut: Dârü‘l-kütübi‘l-arabî, 1987.
  20. » ……., Tezkiratü‟l-huffâz, I-IV, Haydarabad, 1955-1958. İkincil Literatür
  21. » Bauer, Thomas, Das Pflanzenbuch des Abū Hanīfa ad-Dīnawarī. lnhalt, Aufbau, Quellen, Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz, 1988.
  22. » Cook, Michael, Muhammad, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1983.
  23. » Patricia Crone, Slaves and horses: The evulation of the Islamic polity, Cambridge, vd.: Cambridge University Press, 1980.
  24. » Görke, Andreas, Das Kitāb al-Amwāl des Abū Ubaid al-Qāsim b. Sallām: Entstehung und Überlieferung eines frühislamischen Rechtswerkes, Princeton: The Darwin Press, Inc., 2003.
  25. » ……., & Gregor Schoeler, Die ältesten Berichte über das Leben Muhammads: Das Korpus Urwa ibn az-Zubair, Princeton: The Darwin Press, Inc., 2008.
  26. » Horovitz, Josef, De Wâqidii libro qui Kitâb al-MaŞâzî inscribitur, Berlin: Mayer et Müller, 1898.
  27. » ……., The earliest biographies of the Prophet and their authors, L. I. Conrad (Hg.), Prince- ton: The Darwin Press, Inc., 2002.
  28. » Jaeger, Werner Wilhelm, Studien zur Entstehungsgeschichte der Metaphysik des Aristota- les, Berlin: Weidmannsche Buchhandlung, 1912.
  29. » Jones, John Marsden B., ―Ibn Ishāq and al-Wāqidī: The dream of Ātika and the raid to Nakh- la in relation to the charge of plagiarism‖, Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies, c.: 22, 1959, s. 41-51.
  30. » Motzki, Harald (ed.), The biography of Muhammad: The issue of the sources, Leiden: Brill, 2000.
  31. » Noth, Albrecht, ―Isfahân-Nihawand: Eine quellenkritische Studie zur frühislamischen Histo- riographie‖, Zeitschrift der Deutschen Morgenländischen Gesellschaft, c.: 118, 1968, s. 274-96.
  32. » Paret, Rudi, ―Die Lücke in der Überlieferung über den Urislam‖, F. Meier (Hg.), Westöstliche Abhandlungen R. Tschudi zum siebzigsten Geburtstag, Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz, 1954, 147- 53.
  33. » Schacht, Joseph, ―On Mūsā b. Uqba‘s Kitāb al-maghāzī‖, Acta Orientalia, c.: 21, 1953, s. 288-300.
  34. » Schoeler, Gregor, Charakter und Authentie der muslimischen Überlieferung über das Leben Mohammeds, Berlin & New York: De Gruyter, 1996.
  35. » ……., The genesis of literature in Islam: From the aural to the read, Sh. Toorawa tarafından gözden geçirilmiş ve tercüme edilmiş baskı, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2009.
  36. » ……., ―Mūsā b. Uqbas Maghāzī‖, H. Motzki (Hg.), The biography of Muhammad: The issue of the sources içerisinde, Leiden: Brill, 2000.
  37. » …….,The oral and the written in early Islam, çev.: U. Vagelpohl, J. Montgomery (ed.), Lon- don: Routledge, 2006.
  38. » Sezgin, Fuat, Geschichte des arabischen Schrifttums (= GAS), I. c., Leiden: Brill, 1967.
  39. » Stauth, Georg, Die Überlieferung des Korankommentars Muğāhid b. Ğabrs, Doktora tezi, Giessen, 1969.
  40. » Wellhausen, Julius, Muhammed in Medina, (Bu, Vâkıdî‘nin Kitâbü‘l-Meğâzî‘sinin kısaltılmış, Almanca çevirisidir.), Berlin: Reimer, 1882.
  41. » ……., Târîhu‟l-İslâm ve vefeyâti‟l-meşâhîri ve‟l-a‟lâm: I. cilt: es-Sîretü‘n-nebeviyye- II. cilt: el- Meğâzî, thk. U. A. Tadmurî, Beyrut: Dârü‘l-kütübi‘l-arabî, 1987.
  42. » ……., Tezkiratü‟l-huffâz, I-IV, Haydarabad, 1955-1958. İkincil Literatür
  43. » ……., & Gregor Schoeler, Die ältesten Berichte über das Leben Muhammads: Das Korpus Urwa ibn az-Zubair, Princeton: The Darwin Press, Inc., 2008.
  44. » ……., The earliest biographies of the Prophet and their authors, L. I. Conrad (Hg.), Prince- ton: The Darwin Press, Inc., 2002.
  45. » ……., The genesis of literature in Islam: From the aural to the read, Sh. Toorawa tarafından gözden geçirilmiş ve tercüme edilmiş baskı, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2009.
  46. » ……., ―Mūsā b. Uqbas Maghāzī‖, H. Motzki (Hg.), The biography of Muhammad: The issue of the sources içerisinde, Leiden: Brill, 2000.
  47. » …….,The oral and the written in early Islam, çev.: U. Vagelpohl, J. Montgomery (ed.), Lon- don: Routledge, 2006.