SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Gazi University Journal of Science / 2018 / Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 4

The CO Methanation Over The Rh and Ru Promoted NiO-CeO2-ZrO2 Catalysts

Filiz BALIKCI DEREKAYA
Yusuf Serkan KILINÇ
Pages
1064–1077
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Because of thereversed water gas shift reaction activities of the catalysts were decreased after this temperature.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, Rh and Ru promoted NiO-CeO2-ZrO2 catalysts were prepared with different Rhand Ru loadings (3, 4, 5 (wt.%)) by using two different methods.
📊
Key Findings & Data:N2 phsisorption, X-Raydiffraction, scanning electron microscope with energy-dispersive (SEM-EDX) techniques wereused in order to characterize the catalysts.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Because of thereversed water gas shift reaction activities of the catalysts were decreased after this temperature.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In this study, Rh and Ru promoted NiO-CeO2-ZrO2 catalysts were prepared with different Rhand Ru loadings (3, 4, 5 (wt.%)) by using two different methods. N2 phsisorption, X-Raydiffraction, scanning electron microscope with energy-dispersive (SEM-EDX) techniques wereused in order to characterize the catalysts. Catalytic activities of the catalysts were tested for COmethanation. The selective CO methanation catalytic activity tests were made over the mostactive catalysts. The effect of the Rh and Ru loading and preparation method on the COmethanation was discussed. The Ru and Rh have different effect on the surface areas of thecatalysts and identifiable peaks for Rh and Ru not observed from the XRD analysis. Because ofthe low ratio of Rh and Ru in catalysts structures, both Ru and Rh containing catalysts gavesimilar CO methanation activity results. The 50% conversion temperatures of the 3% Ru/NiOCeO2-ZrO2catalysts which were prepared by the co-precipitation and surfactant assisted coprecipitationare 191 C and 185 C, respectively. Selective CO methanation was made over the3% Ru/NiO-CeO2-ZrO2 catalysts. Catalysts gave good activity until 300 C. Because of thereversed water gas shift reaction activities of the catalysts were decreased after this temperature.

🔖

Cite This Article

DEREKAYA, F. B., KILINÇ, Y. S. (2022). The CO Methanation Over The Rh and Ru Promoted NiO-CeO2-ZrO2 Catalysts. Gazi University Journal of Science, Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 4, 1064–1077. https://ajindex.com/articles/521460

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Yaccato, K., Carhart, R., Hagemayer, A., Lesik, A., Strasser, P., Volpe Jr. A.F., Turner, H., Weinberg, H., Graselli, R.K., Brooks, C., “Competitive CO and CO2 methanation over supported noble metal catalysts in high throughput scanning mass spectrometer”, Appl. Catal. A-Gen., 296: 30-48, (2005).
  2. Fujita, S.I., Takezawa, N., “Difference in the selectivity of CO and CO2 methanation reactions”, Chem. Eng. J., 68: 63-68, (1997).
  3. Xu, G., Chen, X., Zhang, Z.G., “Temperature-staged methanation: An alternative method to purify hydrogen-rich fuel gas for PEFC”, Chem. Eng. J., 121: 97-107, (2006).
  4. Dagle, R.A., Wang, Y., Xia, G.G., Strohm, J.J., Holladay, J., Palo, D.R., “Selective CO methanation catalysts for fuel processing applications”, Appl. Catal. A-Gen., 326: 213-218, (2007).
  5. Hakeem, A.A., Rajendran, J., Kapteijn, F., Makee, M., “Effect of Rhodium on the water-gas shift performance of Fe2O3/ZrO2 and CeO2/ZrO2: Influence of rhodium precursor”, Catal. Today., 242: 168-177, (2015).
  6. Galletti, C., Dijinovic, P., Specchia, S., Batista, J., Levec, J., Pintar, A., Specchia, V., “Influence of the preparation method on the performance of Rh catalysts on CeO2 for WGS reaction”, Catal. Today., 176: 336-339, (2011).
  7. De Rogatis, L., Montini, T., Casula, M.F., Fornasiero, P., “Design of [email protected] nanocomposite for ethanol steam reforming”, J. Alloys Comp., 451: 516-520, (2008).
  8. Birst, A., Epron, F., Descorme, C., Duprez, D., “Ethanol steam reforming over Rh/CexZr1-xO2 catalysts: Impact of the CO-CO2-CH4 interconversion reactions on the H2 production”, Appl. Catal. B- Environ., 79: 17-25, (2008).
  9. Wan Abu Bakar, W.A., Ali, R., Toemen, S., “Catalytic methanation reaction over supported nickel-rhodium oxide for purification of simulated natural gas”, J. Nat. Chem., 20: 585-594, (2011).
  10. Derekaya Balıkçı, F., Ermergen, D., “The Selective CO Methanation Over The CeO2/ZrO2 Composed NiO and Co3O4 Catalysts”, Turk. J. Chem., 38: 568-580, (2014).
  11. Matos, I., Fernandes, S., Guerreiro, L., Barata, S., Ramos, A.M., Vital, J., Fonseca, I.M., “The effect of surfactant on the carbon xeorgels”, Microporous Mesoporous Mater., 92: 38-46, (2006).
  12. Boonamnuayvitaya, V., Tayamanon, C., Sae-ung, S., Tanthapanichakoon, W., “Synthesis and characterization of porous media produced by a sol-gel method”, Chem. Eng. Sci., 61: 1686- 1691, (2006).
  13. Zou, Z.Q., Meng, M., Guo, L.H., Zha, Y.Q., “Synthesis and characterization of CuO/Ce1-xTixO2 catalysts used for low-temperature CO oxidation”, J. Hazar