Journals / Gazi University Journal of Science / 2018 / Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 4

Evaluation of The Reptilian Fauna in Amasya Province, Turkey with New Locality Records

Pages
1007–1020
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Although there are some concerns for the sustainabledynamics of reptilian fauna, relatively rich and different European nature information systemhabitat types provide basic survival conditions for reptilian fauna in the province.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The present study investigated the reptilian fauna in Amasya Province, Turkey.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Field studies were undertaken over two consecutive years (2016and 2017).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Although there are some concerns for the sustainabledynamics of reptilian fauna, relatively rich and different European nature information systemhabitat types provide basic survival conditions for reptilian fauna in the province.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2017 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The present study investigated the reptilian fauna in Amasya Province, Turkey. Reptile specieswere identified from collections made during field studies or recorded in literature, with somenew locality records obtained. Field studies were undertaken over two consecutive years (2016and 2017). Two lacertid species, one skink species, two colubrid species and one viper specieswere officially recorded for the first time or their information was updated. In addition tospecies locality records, chorotypical and habitat selection were also assessed and theInternational Union for Conservation of Nature Red List of Threatened Species criteriaincluded. Data on the distribution and locality information for each taxon is also provided. Ourfindings demonstrate that Amasya might be an ecotone zone between the Mediterranean,Caucasian, and European ecosystems. Although there are some concerns for the sustainabledynamics of reptilian fauna, relatively rich and different European nature information systemhabitat types provide basic survival conditions for reptilian fauna in the province.

🔖

Cite This Article

AFSAR, M., ŞAHİN, M. K. (2022). Evaluation of The Reptilian Fauna in Amasya Province, Turkey with New Locality Records. Gazi University Journal of Science, Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 4, 1007–1020. https://ajindex.com/articles/521448

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Mittermeier, R.A., Gil, P.R., Hoffmann, M., Pilgrim, J., Brooks, T., Mittelmeier, C.G., Lamoreux, J., da Fonseca, G.A.B., “Hotspots Revisited. Earth's Biologically Richest and Most Endangered Terrestrial Ecoregions”, Cemex, SA, Agrupación Sierra Madre, SC, (2004).
  2. Uetz, P., http://www.reptile-database.org/db-info/diversity.html, updated, (2015).
  3. Başoğlu, M. & Baran, İ., “Türkiye Sürüngenleri Kısım I: Kaplumbağa ve Kertenkeleler”, İlker Matbaası. İzmir, (1977).
  4. Başoğlu, M. & Baran, İ., “Türkiye Sürüngenleri Kısım II: Yılanlar”, Ege Üniversitesi Basımevi, İzmir, (1998).
  5. Baran, İ., Ilgaz, Ç., Avcı, A., Kumlutaş, Y., Olgun, K., “Türkiye Amfibi ve Sürüngenleri”, TÜBİTAK Popüler Bilim Kitapları, (2012).
  6. Sindaco, R., Venchi, A., Carpaneto, G.M., Bologna, M.A., “The reptiles of Anatolia: a checklist and zoogeographical analysis”. Biogeographia, 21, 441-554, (2000).
  7. Gasc J. P., Cabela A., Crnobrnja-Isailovic J., Dolmen D., Grossenbacher K., Haffner P., Lescure J., Martens H., Martínez Rica J.P., Maurin H., Oliveira M.E., Sofianidou T.S., Veith M. & Zuiderwijk A., “Atlas of Amphibians and Reptiles in Europe”. Collection Patrimoines Naturels, 29, Societas Europaea Herpetologica, Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle & Service du Petrimone Naturel. Paris,(1997).
  8. Eiselt, J., Baran, İ.: “Ergebnisse zoologischer Sammelreisen in der Türkei: Viperidae. Annalen des Naturhistorischen Museums”, Wien 74: 357-369, (1970).
  9. Baran İ., Kumlutaş Y., Ilgaz Ç., Iret F. “Geographical distributions and taxonomical states of Telescopus fallax (Fleischman, 1831) and Vipera barani Böhme and Joger, 1983” Turkish Journal of Zoology, 29: 217–224, (2005).
  10. Cevik, E., Başkale, E., Kaya, U., Turgay, F. “Taxonomic status of some Lacerta danfordi (Günther, 1876) populations”, 13 (2), Russian Journal of Herpetology, 89-92, (2006).
  11. Avcı A., Ilgaz Ç., Baskaya S., Baran İ., Kumlutas Y. “Contribution to the distribution and morphology of Pelias darevskii (Vedmederja, Orlov et Tuniyev 1986) (Reptilia: Squamata: Viperidae) in northeastern Anatolia”. Russian Journal of Herpetology, 17: 1–7, (2010).
  12. Afsar, M., Çiçek, K., Dinçarslan, Y.E., Ayaz, D., Tok, C.V.: “New record localities of five snake species in Turkey”. Herpetozoa 25 (3/4): 179-183, (2013).
  13. Göçmen B., Mebert K., Iğci N., Akman B., Yıldız M. Z., Oğuz M. A., Altın Ç. “New locality records for four rare species of vipers (Reptilia: Viperidae) in Turkey” Zoology in the Middle East, 60: 306–313, (2014).
  14. Fattahi, R., Ficetola, G.F., Rastegar-Pouyani,