SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Gaziosmanpaşa Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 37 - Sayı: 3

The Effect of Water Stress on Nutrient Elements in Soil and Leaf of Common Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)

Su Stresinin Fasulye (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) Toprakta ve Yapraklarında Besin Elementleri Üzerine Etkisi

Ramazan BEYAZ
Sultan KIYMAZ
Ahu Alev ABACI-BAYAR
Pages
130–140
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

As a result,based on the data obtained in this study, it may be stated that cv. "Gina" is more tolerant to water stress incomparison to the other varieties in the pot experiment.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Water resources are a scarce and limiting factor for expanding cultivation and plant production inmany arid and semi-arid areas.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The treatments consisted of three irrigation regimes to which 100% (I1.00), 75% (I0.75)and 50% (I0.50) of depleted water from field capacity and four bean varieties ("Sarıkız", "Sazova", "Kırk Günlük",and "Gina").
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As a result,based on the data obtained in this study, it may be stated that cv. "Gina" is more tolerant to water stress incomparison to the other varieties in the pot experiment.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Water resources are a scarce and limiting factor for expanding cultivation and plant production inmany arid and semi-arid areas. This study was conducted to investigate the effects of different water deficit levelson soil and plant (leaf) concentration of macro and micro nutrients of four common bean cultivars and was carriedout in a pot in a greenhouse. The treatments consisted of three irrigation regimes to which 100% (I1.00), 75% (I0.75)and 50% (I0.50) of depleted water from field capacity and four bean varieties ("Sarıkız", "Sazova", "Kırk Günlük",and "Gina"). It was determined that leaf macro and micro nutrients reduced from the full irrigation treatment(I1.00) to the treatment exposed the highest water stress (I0.50). The highest values of the macro and microparameters in the soil under the highest water constraint were obtained in cv. "Gina". However, the highest valuesin the cv. "Sazova" were obtained in terms of micro elements in the leaf, and the highest values were obtainedfrom the cv. "Gina" in terms of macro elements in the treatments of the highest water constraint (I0.50). As a result,based on the data obtained in this study, it may be stated that cv. "Gina" is more tolerant to water stress incomparison to the other varieties in the pot experiment.

Özet

Birçok kurak ve yarı kurak bölgelerde tarım alanlarının yayılımı ve bitki üretimi için su kaynakları kıt ve sınırlayıcı bir faktördür. Bu çalışma, farklı su kısıtı koşulları altında yetiştirilen dört fasulye çeşidinde ve toprakta makro ve mikro besin maddelerinin konsantrasyonu üzerindeki etkilerini araştırmak için yapılmış ve serada saksı denemesi olarak yürütülmüştür. Deneme konuları üç farklı sulama seviyesi (tarla kapasitesine göre tüketilen suyun %100 (I1.00), %75 (I0.75) ve %50 (I0.50)’sinin uygulamıştır) ve dört fasulye çeşidinden (Sarıkız, Sazova, Kırk Günlük ve Gina) oluşmuştur. Tam sulama (I1.00) seviyesinden en fazla su stresi etkisinde olan I0.50 konusuna doğru yaprakta makro ve mikro besin maddelerinin azaldığı belirlenmiştir. Toprakta en yüksek makro ve mikro besin elementleri I0.50 konusunda "Gina" çeşidinde belirlenmiştir. Bununla birlikte, su kısıtının en yüksek olduğu konularda yapraktaki mikro elementler açısından, en yüksek değerler "Sazova", makro elementler açısından da en yüksek değerler "Gina" da elde edilmiştir. Sonuç olarak, bu çalışmada elde edilen verilere dayanarak, "Gina" çeşidinin diğer çeşitlere kıyasla su stresi şartlarında makro elementleri daha iyi alabildiği söylenebilir.

🔖

Cite This Article

BEYAZ, R., KIYMAZ, S., ABACI-BAYAR, A. A. (2022). The Effect of Water Stress on Nutrient Elements in Soil and Leaf of Common Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Gaziosmanpaşa Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 37 - Sayı: 3, 130–140. https://ajindex.com/articles/520795

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Abaci AA (2009). Comparison of The Ecophysiologıcal Properties of C4 Haloxylon Persicum and C3 Tamarix Parviflora By Eczotic Specıes Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Unıversıty Graduate School of Natural And Applied Scıences Master Of Science Thesis pp:72. Abu-Muriefah SS (2013). Effect of chitosan on common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) plants grown under water stress conditions. International Research Journal of Agricultural Science and Soil Science, 3(6): 192-199.
  2. Abdalla, MM and El-Khoshiban, NH (2007). The Influence of Water Stress on Growth, Relative Water Content, Photosynthetic Pigments, Some Metabolic and Hormonal Contents of Two Triticium aestivum Cultivars. Journal of Applied Sciences Research, 3 (12): 2062-2074.
  3. Alam SM (1999). Nutrient uptake by plants unders stress conditions. In: Pessaraki M (ed) Handbook of plant and crop stress. Marcel Dekker, New York, pp: 285- 314. Amtmann A and Blatt MR (2009). Regulation of macronutrient transport. New Phytologist, 181: 35 MR-32. Ankenbauer, KJ and Loheide SP (2017). The effects of soil organic matter on soil water retention and plant water use in a meadow of the Sierra Nevada, CA. Hydrological Processes, 31: 891-901.
  4. Ashraf MY, Ala SA and Bhatti AS (1998). Nutritional imbalance in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) genotypes grown under soil water deficit. Acta physiologiae plantarum, 20: 307-311.
  5. Ashraf MY, Mahmood K, Ashraf M, Akhter J and Hussain F (2016). Optimal Supply of Micronutrients Improves Drought Tolerance in Legumes, 25: 637- 657. Badiane A, Ndour NYB, Guèye F, Faye S, Ndoye I and Masse D (2012). Effects of different inputs of organic matter on the response of plant production to a soil water stress in Sahelian region. Natural Science, 4(12): 969-975.
  6. Barker AV and Pilbeam DV (2007). Handbook of Plant Nutrition (1ndEdn), CRC Taylor and Francis, NY, pp: 636. Bhadoria PBS, Prakash YS and Rakshit A (2003). Relative efficacy of organic manures on rice production in lateritic soil. Soil Use and Management, 19: 80-82.
  7. Bouyocous GL (1951). A Recalibration of Hydrometer Method for Making Mechanical Analysis of soils. Agronomy Journal, 43: 434-438.
  8. Cakmak I (2005). Role of potassium in alleviating the detrimental effects of abiotic stress plants. Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 168: 521-530.
  9. Camoglu G (2013). The effects of water stress on evapotranspiration and leaf temperatures of two olive cultivars. Zemdirbyste, 100(1): 91-98.
  10. Demiralay İ (1981). Some Physical Analysis Methods in Soil. Atatürk U