Journals / Gazi Medical Journal / 2016 / Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 3

Sağlıklı Çocuklarda Rutin Preoperatif Laboratuvar Testlerinin Kullanımı ve Preoperatif Değerlendirmede Öykünün Önemi: Tek Merkez Deneyimi

Remembering the Importance of an Old Friend: History Taking in Preoperative Evaluation of Healthy Children: A Single Center Experience

Pages
124–127
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: Routine laboratory tests contribute little to preoperative evaluation of children with normal history and physical examination undergoing low grade surgery.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: To investigate the consequences of routine laboratory tests that lead to surgical delay or high cost in patients with a normal medical history and physical examination who undergo minor surgical interventions.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Patients and Method: Files of 1,322 patients aged between 0-16 years that had undergone elective surgical intervention within six years were reviewed.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: Routine laboratory tests contribute little to preoperative evaluation of children with normal history and physical examination undergoing low grade surgery.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the consequences of routine laboratory tests that lead to surgical delay or high cost in patients with a normal medical history and physical examination who undergo minor surgical interventions. Patients and Method: Files of 1,322 patients aged between 0-16 years that had undergone elective surgical intervention within six years were reviewed. Results: Of the 1,322 patients, 1,246 (94.3%) had normal physical examination and laboratory findings. Seventy-six children who had abnormalities in laboratory findings and physical examination were referred to pediatrics. Of the 76 pediatric referees, 42 (55.3%) were reevaluated and were diagnosed with upper respiratory tract infection (n=23; 30.2%), iron deficiency anemia (n=5; 6.5%), innocent murmur (n=4; 5.3%), thalassemia minor (n=2; 2.6%), lower respiratory tract infection (n=2; 2.6%), urinary tract infection (n=1; 1.3%), mumps (n=1; 1.3%), acute gastroenteritis (n=1; 1.3%), minimal aortic and tricuspid valve insufficiency (n=1; 1.3%), minimal aortic stenosis (n=1; 1.3%), atrial septal defect (n=1; 1.3%). Surgical interventions were delayed until the recovery of the infectious diseases. In 25 of the patients, repeated tests showed normal ranges after the second test; however nine (n=9) of the patients showed increased or decreased numbers of white blood cell counts and whose medical history and physical examination revealed signs and symptoms related to infection. Conclusion: Routine laboratory tests contribute little to preoperative evaluation of children with normal history and physical examination undergoing low grade surgery.

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışma, öykü ve fizik muayenesinde patolojik özelliği olmayan minör cerrahi uygulanan çocuklarda preoperatif değerlendirme sırasında istenen değerlendirmeye katkısını ortaya koymak amacıyla planlanmıştır. Hastalar ve Yöntem: Elektif koşullarda cerrahi işlem uygulanmış, yaşları 0 ile 16 yaş arasında değişen toplam 1322 çocuğun kayıtları retrospektif incelendi. Bulgular: Çocukların 1246'sının (% 94.3) fizik muayene ve laboratuvar bulguları normaldi. Fizik muayene ve laboratuvar tetkiklerinde patoloji saptanan 76 çocuğun pediatri polikliniğine danışıldığı görüldü. Bu çocuklar değerlendirildiğinde 42 çocuğun 23'ü (% 30.2) üst solunum yolu enfeksiyonu, beşi (% 6.5) demir eksikliği anemisi, dördü ( 5.3) masum üfürüm, ikisi (% 2.6) talasemi taşıyıcılığı, ikisi (% 2.6) alt solunum yolu enfeksiyonu, biri (%1.3) idrar yolu enfeksiyonu, biri (%1.3) kabakulak, biri (%1.3) akut gastroenterit, biri (%1.3) minimal aort ve triküspit kapak yetmezliği, biri (%1.3) minimal aort stenozu, biri (%1.3) atrial septal defekt tanısı aldı. Enfeksiyonu olan hastaların ameliyatı enfeksiyon tedavi süresince ertelendi. 25 çocukta ikinci kez tekrarlanan preoperatif testler normal bulundu, ancak 9 öykü ve fizik inceleme bulgularının enfeksiyonla ilişkisi saptanan 9 hastada lökosit sayısı artmış veya azalmış olarak devam etti. Sonuç: Öykü ve fizik muayenesinde patolojik özelliği olmayan grade 1-2 cerrahi grubu çocuklarda rutin uygulanan laboratuvar testlerinin preoperatif değerlendirmeye çok az katkısı bulunmaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

ALBAYRAK, M., BAŞAR, H., TOPRAK, Ş., ŞANLI, C., MISIRLIOĞLU, E. D., KOCAK, Ü. (2022). Sağlıklı Çocuklarda Rutin Preoperatif Laboratuvar Testlerinin Kullanımı ve Preoperatif Değerlendirmede Öykünün Önemi: Tek Merkez Deneyimi. Gazi Medical Journal, Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 3, 124–127. https://ajindex.com/articles/519995

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Smetana GW, Macpherson DS. The case against routine preoperative laboratory testing. Med Clin North Am 2003; 87: 7-40.
  2. Garcia-Miguel FJ, Serrano-Aguilar PG, Lopez-Bastida J. Preoperative assessment. Lancet 2003; 362: 1749-57.
  3. Eckman MH, Erban JK, Singh SK, Kao GS. Screening for the risk for bleeding or thrombosis. Ann Intern Med 2003; 138: W15-24. Burk CD, Miller L, Handler SD, Cohen AR. Preoperative history and coagulation screening in children undergoing tonsillectomy. Pediatrics 1992; 89: 691-5. Schneider PD. Preoperative assessment of liver function. Surg Clin North Am 2004; 84: 355-73.
  4. Hartnick CJ, Ruben RJ. Preoperative coagulation studies prior to tonsillectomy. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2000; 126: 684-6. National Institute for Clinical Excellence (2004). Guidance on the use of routine preoperative testing for elective surgery. NICE Clinical Guideline No. 3. London: National Institute for Clinical Excellence. Available from: www.nice.org.uk Vural Ç. Pediatrik Hastaların Preoperatif Değerlendirmesi. Osmangazi Tıp Dergisi 2014; 36: 38-43 Tercan E. Pediatrik Anestezide Preoperatif Hazırlık ve Premedikasyon Turkiye Klinikleri J Pediatr Sci 2006; 2: 96-100.
  5. Akıncı SB, Sarıcaoğlu F, Dal D, Aypar Ü. Preoperatif anestetik değerlendirme. Hacettepe Tıp Dergisi 2005; 36:91-7.
  6. France FH, Lefebvre C. Cost-effectiveness of preoperative examinations. Acta Clin Belg 1997; 52: 275-86.
  7. Mantha S, Roizen MF, Madduri J, Rajender Y, Naidu KS, Gayatri K. Usefulness of routine preoperative testing: a prospective single-observer study. J Clin Anesth 2005;17: 51-7. Roizen MF. More preoperative assessment by physicians and less by laboratory tests. N Engl J Med 2000; 342: 204-5.
  8. O'Connor ME, Drasner K. Preoperative laboratory testing of children undergoing elective surgery. Anesth Analg. 1990; 70: 176-80. López-Argumedo M., Asua J. Preoperative Evaluation in Elective Surgery. (INAHTA Synthesis Report). Vitoria-Gasteiz. Dpt. of Health Basque Government. Basque Office for Health Technology Assessment, Osteba. 1999 van Klei WA, Grobbee DE, Rutten CL, Hennis PJ, Knape JT, Kalkman CJ, Moons KG. Role of history and physical examination in preoperative evaluation. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2003; 20: 612-8.
  9. Meneghini L, Zadra N, Zanette G, Baiocchi M, Giusti F. The usefulness of routine preoperative laboratory tests for one-day surgery in healthy children. Paediatr Anaesth 1998; 8: 11-5.
  10. Narr BJ, Warner ME, Schroeder DR, Warner MA. Outcomes of patients with no laboratory assessment be