SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi / 2015 / Cilt: 35 - Sayı: 2

The Empirical Testing of Social and Individual Participation Factors Constructed Theoretically

Teorik Olarak Yapılandırılmış Sosyal ve Bireysel Katılım Faktörlerinin Ampirik Olarak Sınanması

Osman Yılmaz KARTAL
Remzi Y KINCAL
Pages
231–265
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It was found out that in social participation, environment and benefit factors are not efficient, while in individual participation only environment factor is not efficient.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The approach of active citizenship addresses individuals’ public, social and individual participations in the context of democratic values.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this study, it is aimed to perform empirical testing of social and individual participation factors that were constructed theoretically.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It was found out that in social participation, environment and benefit factors are not efficient, while in individual participation only environment factor is not efficient.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The approach of active citizenship addresses individuals’ public, social and individual participations in the context of democratic values. In this study, it is aimed to perform empirical testing of social and individual participation factors that were constructed theoretically. Withsurvey design, this study applied to the pre-service teachers in School of Education, Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University. Social Participation Level Scale, Individual Participation Level Scale, Factors Affect Social Participation Scale, Factors Affect Individual Participation Scale and Media Literacy Questionnaire were used as data collection tools. Descriptive statistics and ANOVA test were performed for data analysis. According to results, social participation is affected by readiness of cognitive and affective levels, social competence, personal opportunities, effective organizing factors, while individual participation is affected by readiness of cognitive and affective levels, social competence, personal opportunities, benefit and sense of belonging factors. It was found out that in social participation, environment and benefit factors are not efficient, while in individual participation only environment factor is not efficient.

Özet

Aktif vatandaşlık, bireylerin demokratik değerler çerçevesinde kamusal, sosyal ve bireysel katılım davranışı sergilemesini ifade etmektedir. Çalışmada teorik olarak arkaplanı temellendirilmiş sosyal ve bireysel katılım davranışlarına etki eden faktörlerin ampirik olarak sınanması amaçlanmaktadır. Tarama modelinde ele alınan araştırma, Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi'nde öğrenim gören öğretmen adaylarının görüşlerine göre gerçekleştirilmiştir. Çalışmada veri toplama araçları olarak, Sosyal Katılım Düzey Ölçeği, Bireysel Katılım Düzey Ölçeği, Sosyal Katılımı Etkileyen Faktörler Ölçeği, Bireysel Katılımı Etkileyen Faktörler Ölçeği ve Medya Okuryazarlığı Anketi kullanılmıştır. Verilerin analizinde betimsel istatistikler ve ANOVA testi gerçekleştirilmiştir. Çalışma sonucunda, sosyal katılım davranışının gerçekleşmesinde duygusal tatminlik, bilişsel hazıroluş, sosyal yeterlik, kişisel imkân, etkili örgütlenme faktörlerinin; bireysel katılım davranışın gerçekleşmesinde ise duygusal tatminlik, bilişsel hazıroluş, sosyal yeterlik, kişisel imkân, kazanç ve aidiyet faktörlerinin etkili olduğuna ulaşılmaktadır. Sosyal katılımda ortam ve kazanç; bireysel katılımda ise ortam faktörlerinin etkili olmadığı görülmüştür

🔖

Cite This Article

KARTAL, O. Y., KINCAL, R. Y. (2022). The Empirical Testing of Social and Individual Participation Factors Constructed Theoretically. Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 35 - Sayı: 2, 231–265. https://ajindex.com/articles/519559

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Akinboye, O. A., Ayanwuyi, E., Kuponiyi, F. A., & Oyetoro, J. (2007). Factors affecting youth participation in community development in Remo North Government Area of Ogun State, The Social Sciences, 2(3), 307-311.
  2. Aufderheide, P., & Firestone, C. M. (1993). Media literacy: A report of the national leadership Conference on Media Literacy. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
  3. Babbie, E. (2011). The Basics of social research.(5th ed.). Wadsworth CENGAGE Learning Brodie, E., Cowling, E. Nissen, N., Paine, A.E., Jochum, V., & Warburton, D. (2009). Pathways through participation. Understanding participation: A literature review. http://www.sp.gov.tr/documents/Pathways-literature-review-final-version.pdf
  4. Buckingham, D. (2003). Media education: Literacy, learning and contemporary culture, Polity Press,
  5. Cambridge, UK. Carlsson, U., Tayie, S., Jacquinot-Delaunay G., & Manuet Perez Tornero, J. (2008). Empowerment through media education: An intercultural dialogue. NORDICOM and international clearinghouse on children, Youth and Media. Goteborg, Sweden. Chapin, F. S. (1955). Experimental designs in sociological research. Harper, New York. Checkoway, B. (2011). What is youth participation?. Children and Youth Services Review, 33, 340–345.
  6. Cicognani, E., Zani, B., Fournier, B., Gavray, C., & Born, M. (2012). Gender differences in youths’ political engagement and participation. The role of parents and of adolescents’ social and civic participation. Journal of Adolescence, 35, 561–576.
  7. Culver, S. H., & Jacobson, T. (2012). Media literacy and its use as a method to encourage civic engagement. Comunicar, 39, 73-80.
  8. D'Haenens, L., Koeman, J., & Saeys, F. (2007). Digital citizenship among ethnic minority youths in the Netherlands and Flanders. New Media& Society, 9, 278- 299 European Commission. (1998). Education and active citizenship in the European Union Office for official publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg. European Commission (2007). Current trends and approaches to media literacy in Europe. http://ec.europa.eu/culture/media/literacy/studies/index_en.htm
  9. European Commission (2009). Commission recommendation on media literacy in the digital environment for a more comepetative audiovisual and content ıındustry and an inclusive knowledge society, 6464 Final, Brussels. European Commission Media Literacy Unit (2011). Testing and refining criteria to assess media literacy levels in Europe Final Report. http://ec.europa.eu/culture/media/literacy/studies/index_en.htm E