Journals / Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi / 2017 / Cilt: 37 - Sayı: 2

Views of Students About Online Problem-Based Collaborative Learning and Online Problem-Based Individual Learning

Öğrencilerin Çevrimiçi Problem Temelli İşbirliğine Dayalı - Çevrimiçi Problem Temelli Bireysel Öğrenmeyi Değerlendirmesi

Pages
559–591
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It has been determined that each of these variables directly or indirectly affects its sublayer.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The purpose of this study is to compare students' opinions on problem-based collaborative learning and problem-based individual learning method in an online learning environment.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The interviews were held at four different times with a total of 24 students.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It has been determined that each of these variables directly or indirectly affects its sublayer.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to compare students' opinions on problem-based collaborative learning and problem-based individual learning method in an online learning environment. The study was conducted within an eight-week extracurricular course at a state university in the Mediterranean region of Turkey. Thirty vocational college students participated in the study. Grounded theory was used as data analysis method in the study. Data were collected with interviews and reflective reports. The interviews were held at four different times with a total of 24 students. Additionally, student reflections were collected from 30 students at the end of the course. Data analyzes were made with open coding, axial coding and selective coding. As a result of the research, it was determined that there are three main factors that affect the participation of the students in the collaborative learning method and the individual learning method. These variables are from inside out; personal approaches, changes in student views, and attributes related to course environment. It has been determined that each of these variables directly or indirectly affects its sublayer.

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı çevrimiçi ortamda, öğrencilerin problem temelli işbirliğine dayalı çalışma yöntemini ve bireysel çalışma yöntemini kullanımları hakkındaki görüşlerini karşılaştırmaktır. Akdeniz bölgesindeki bir devlet üniversitesinde sekiz haftalık kurs kapsamında gerçekleştirilen bu çalışmaya 30 meslek yüksekokulu öğrencisi katılmıştır. Çalışmada kuram oluşturma yöntemi kullanılmıştır. Veriler görüşmeler ve yansı raporları ile toplanmıştır. Görüşmeler toplam 24 öğrenci ile dört farklı zamanda gerçekleştirilmiştir. Yansı raporları ise 30 öğrenciden kurs sonunda toplanmıştır. Analizler açık kodlama, eksenel kodlama ve seçici kodlama ile yapılmıştır. Araştırma sonucunda öğrencilerin işbirliğine dayalı çalışma yöntemine ve bireysel çalışma yöntemine katılımını etkileyen üç ana faktör olduğu belirlenmiştir. Bu değişkenler içten dışa doğru; kişisel yaklaşımlar, oluşan değişiklikler ve ortama bağlı özelliklerdir. Bu değişkenlerin her birinin, doğrudan ya da dolaylı olarak alt katmanını etkilediği belirlenmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇAKIR, H., ÖZKARA, B. Ö. (2022). Views of Students About Online Problem-Based Collaborative Learning and Online Problem-Based Individual Learning. Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 37 - Sayı: 2, 559–591. https://ajindex.com/articles/519502

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (4)

  1. Akarasriworn, C. (2011). Students' knowledge construction and attitudes toward syncronous videconferencing in an online collaborative problem-based learning environment (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Northern Colorado, Colorado. An, Y. (2006). Collaborative problem-based learning in online environments (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Indiana University, Indiana. Anderson, T., & Garrison, D. R. (1998). Learning in a networked world: New roles and responsibilities. In C. Gibson (Ed.), Distance learners in higher education (pp. 7- 112). Madison, WI: Atwood Publishing. Anderson, T., & Kuskis, A. (2007). Models of Interactions. In M. M.G. (Ed.), Handbooks of Distance Education (Second Edi, pp. 295-309). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Mahwah. Asunka, S. A. (2009). Ghanaian university students' perceptions of collaborative online learning environments: A case study (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Columbia University. Atıcı, B., & Gürol, M. (2002). Bilgisayar destekli asenkron işbirlikli öğrenme yönteminin öğrenci başarısına etkisi. Eğitim ve Bilim, 27(124), 3-12. http://egitimvebilim.ted.org.tr/index.php/EB/article/view/5152/1283 adresinden erişilmiştir. Bell, S. (2010). Project-based learning for the 21st century: Skills for the future. The Clearing House, 83(2), 39-43.
  2. Bridges, E. M. (1992). Problem based learning for administrators. http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED347617.pdf adresinden erişilmiştir. Capdeferro, N., & Romero, M. (2012). Are online learners frustrated with collaborative learning experiences? The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 13(2), 26-44. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v13i2.1127
  3. Carr-Chellman, A., Dyer, D., & Breman, J. (2000). Burrowing through the network wires: does distance detract from collaborative authentic learning? International Journal of E-Learning & Distance Education, 15(1), 39-62. http://ijede.ca/index.php/jde/article/view/197/405 adresinden erişilmiştir. Cheng, X., Wang, X., Huang, J., & Zarifis, A. (2016). An experimental study of satisfaction response: evaluation of online collaborative learning. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 17(1), 60-78.
  4. Cheryl, L. (2003). enGauge 21st century skills: Literacy in the digital age. Napierville, IL and Los Angeles, CA: NCREL and Metiri. http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED463753.pdf adresinden erişilmiştir. Cho, S. K., & Berge, Z. L. (2002). Overcoming barri