Journals / Forbes tıp dergisi (Online) / 2021 / Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 2

Remodeling in Patients with in Situ Fixation for a Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis

Femur Başı Epifiz Kayması Nedeniyle in situ fiksasyon UygulananHastalarda Remodelasyon

Pages
99–107
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In patients with severe epiphyseal displacement, open reduction is an option but in situ pinning should be considered in that it is less invasive and more physiological

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: This study has investigated the amount of bone remodeling in patients with a slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) treated with in situ fixation until closure of the epiphysis and the factors affecting remodeling.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Method: Patients who underwent surgery for SCFE between January 2010 and January 2015 were retrospectively screened: Twenty-four male and 7 female patients (mean age 12.6 ± 1.9 years) were included in the study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In patients with severe epiphyseal displacement, open reduction is an option but in situ pinning should be considered in that it is less invasive and more physiological
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:2010 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: This study has investigated the amount of bone remodeling in patients with a slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) treated with in situ fixation until closure of the epiphysis and the factors affecting remodeling. Method: Patients who underwent surgery for SCFE between January 2010 and January 2015 were retrospectively screened: Twenty-four male and 7 female patients (mean age 12.6 ± 1.9 years) were included in the study. Gender, age, history, and laterality of trauma, duration of hip pain (acute, chronic, acute on chronic background), and hip radiographs were evaluated. The Southwick and alpha angles were measured, and the factors affecting remodeling were assessed. The statistical analyses were conducted using SPSS 25.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY); 95% confidence levels were calculated and p < 0.05 was considered to indicate statistical significance. Results: The preoperative displacement angles measured on the anteroposterior and lateral radiographs were 15.03° ± 9.1° and 25.93° ± 14.1° and at the last follow-up they were 11.63° ± 8.7° and 21.6° ± 12.1°, respectively. The alpha angles measured on the lateral radiographs preoperatively and at the end of follow-up were 52.33° ± 11.6° and 47.87° ± 11.8°, respectively. Significant remodeling was reflected in the angles measured on the anteroposterior and lateral X-ray images. Greater preoperative displacement angle was associated with less remodeling. Conclusion: Preoperative displacement affects the degree of postoperative remodeling. In patients with severe epiphyseal displacement, open reduction is an option but in situ pinning should be considered in that it is less invasive and more physiological

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmada femur başı epifiz kayması (FBEK) nedeniyle in situ fiksasyon uygulanan hastalarda epifiz kapanana kadar oluşan remodelasyon miktarı ve buna etki eden faktörler araştırılmıştır. Yöntem: Ocak 2010- Ocak 2015 tarihleri arasında FBEK nedeniyle opere edilen hastalar retrospektif olarak tarandı. Yaş ortalaması 12,6 ± 1,9 olan 23 erkek ve 7 kız hasta çalışmaya dahil edildi. Hastaların cinsiyet, yaş, taraf, travma öyküsü ve kalça röntgenleri değerlendirildi. Röntgenlerde Southwick ve alfa açıları ölçüldü. Kalça ağrısı süresine göre hastalar üç gruba (akut, kronik, kronik zeminde akut) ayrıldı. İstatistiksel analizler SPSS 25.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY) program ile; % 95 güven aralığında ve p

🔖

Cite This Article

UZAKGİDER, M., KAÇMAZ, İ. E., BASA, C. D., ZHAMİLOV, V., REİSOĞLU, A., AGUS, H. (2022). Remodeling in Patients with in Situ Fixation for a Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis. Forbes tıp dergisi (Online), Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 2, 99–107. https://ajindex.com/articles/517920

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (3)

  1. Mahran MA, Baraka MM, Hefny HM. Slipped capital femoral epiphysis: a review of management in the hip impingement era. SICOT J. 2017;3:35. doi:10.1051/sicotj/2017018. Samelis PV, Papagrigorakis E, Konstantinou AL, Lalos H, Koulouvaris P. Factors Affecting Outcomes of Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis. Cureus. 2020;12(2):e6883. doi:10.7759/cureus.6883. Vanhegan IS, Cashman JP, Buddhdev P, HashemiNejad A. Outcomes following subcapital osteotomy for severe slipped upper femoral epiphysis. Bone Joint J. 2015;97-B(12):1718-25. doi:10.1302/0301-620X.97B12.35259. Peck K, Herrera-Soto J. Slipped capital femoral epiphysis: what’s new? Orthop Clin North Am. 2014;45(1):77-86. doi:10.1016/j.ocl.2013.09.002. Loder RT, O’Donnell PW, Didelot WP, Kayes KJ. Valgus slipped capital femoral epiphysis. J Pediatr Orthop. 2006;26(5):594-600. doi:10.1097/01.bpo.0000230331.96157.14. Mathew SE, Larson AN. Natural History of Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis. J Pediatr Orthop. 2019;39(Issue 6, Supplement 1 Suppl 1):S23-S7. doi:10.1097/BPO.0000000000001369. Reinhardt M, Stauner K, Schuh A, Steger W, Schraml A. Slipped capital femoral epiphysis: long-term outcome and remodelling after in situ fixation. Hip Int. 2016;26(1):25-30. doi:10.5301/hipint.5000298. Allen MM, Rosenfeld SB. Treatment for Post-Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis Deformity. Orthop Clin North Am. 2020;51(1):37-53. doi:10.1016/j.ocl.2019.08.008. Roaten J, Spence DD. Complications Related to the Treatment of Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis. Orthop Clin North Am. 2016;47(2):405-13. doi:10.1016/j.ocl.2015.09.013. Wensaas A, Svenningsen S, Terjesen T. Long-term outcome of slipped capital femoral epiphysis: a 38-year follow-up of 66 patients. J Child Orthop. 2011;5(2):75-82. doi:10.1007/s11832-010-0308-0.
  2. Jones JR, Paterson DC, Hillier TM, Foster BK. Remodelling after pinning for slipped capital femoral epiphysis. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1990;72(4):568-73. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301- 620X.72B4.2380205 Upasani VV, Matheney TH, Spencer SA, Kim YJ, Millis MB, Kasser JR. Complications after modified Dunn osteotomy for the treatment of adolescent slipped capital femoral epiphysis. J Pediatr Orthop. 2014;34(7):661-7. doi:10.1097/BPO.0000000000000161. Schai PA, Exner GU, Hansch O. Prevention of secondary coxarthrosis in slipped capital femoral epiphysis: a long-term follow-up study after corrective intertrochanteric osteotomy. J Pediatr Orthop B. 1996;5(3):135-43. doi:10.1097/01202412-199605030-00001.
  3. Accadbled F, Murgier J, De